Active Labor Market Policies and instability of their allocations: A changing relationship in the case of regions of Tunisia

IF 1.7 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Regional Science Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100026
Marwa Sahnoun , Chokri Abdennadher
{"title":"Active Labor Market Policies and instability of their allocations: A changing relationship in the case of regions of Tunisia","authors":"Marwa Sahnoun ,&nbsp;Chokri Abdennadher","doi":"10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Evaluation studies focus exclusively on the impact of Active Labor Market Policies (ALMP) on the functioning of the labor market. In particular, they measure the impact of specific programs on the income and future of target groups. Studies that aim to assess the impact of ALMPs as a whole on the overall performance of the labor market remain quite rare. Evaluation studies do not focus on the design and implementation of ALMPs. Little is known about the factors behind the failure or success of ALMPs. This paper addresses this problem by examining how a factor relating to the instability of ALMP and their associated budgetary allocations leads to ineffective ALMPs in a regional context. Based on dynamic panel regression models for a sample of 24 governorates in Tunisia grouped into 7 regions. over the period from 2005 to 2015, we found that ALMPs are effective in reducing the unemployment rate. In addition, by testing the moderating effect of the instability of ALMPs, we show that this instability is very harmful insofar as the link between ALMPs and the unemployment rate is attenuated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45520,"journal":{"name":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224000611/pdfft?md5=1d31cf3d5ecd1f038c2150de3d2a0e61&pid=1-s2.0-S1757780224000611-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224000611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluation studies focus exclusively on the impact of Active Labor Market Policies (ALMP) on the functioning of the labor market. In particular, they measure the impact of specific programs on the income and future of target groups. Studies that aim to assess the impact of ALMPs as a whole on the overall performance of the labor market remain quite rare. Evaluation studies do not focus on the design and implementation of ALMPs. Little is known about the factors behind the failure or success of ALMPs. This paper addresses this problem by examining how a factor relating to the instability of ALMP and their associated budgetary allocations leads to ineffective ALMPs in a regional context. Based on dynamic panel regression models for a sample of 24 governorates in Tunisia grouped into 7 regions. over the period from 2005 to 2015, we found that ALMPs are effective in reducing the unemployment rate. In addition, by testing the moderating effect of the instability of ALMPs, we show that this instability is very harmful insofar as the link between ALMPs and the unemployment rate is attenuated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
积极的劳动力市场政策及其分配的不稳定性:突尼斯各地区不断变化的关系
评估研究只关注积极劳动力市场政策(ALMP)对劳动力市场运作的影响。特别是,它们衡量特定计划对目标群体的收入和未来的影响。旨在评估积极劳动力市场政策作为一个整体对劳动力市场整体表现的影响的研究仍然相当罕见。评估研究并不关注 ALMP 的设计和实施。人们对 ALMP 失败或成功背后的因素知之甚少。本文针对这一问题,研究了与 ALMP 及其相关预算分配的不稳定性有关的因素是如何导致 ALMP 在地区范围内失效的。基于 2005 年至 2015 年期间突尼斯 7 个大区 24 个省样本的动态面板回归模型,我们发现 ALMP 能有效降低失业率。此外,通过检验 ALMPs 不稳定性的调节作用,我们发现这种不稳定性非常有害,因为 ALMPs 与失业率之间的联系被削弱了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Regional Science Policy & Practice (RSPP) is the official policy and practitioner orientated journal of the Regional Science Association International. It is an international journal that publishes high quality papers in applied regional science that explore policy and practice issues in regional and local development. It welcomes papers from a range of academic disciplines and practitioners including planning, public policy, geography, economics and environmental science and related fields. Papers should address the interface between academic debates and policy development and application. RSPP provides an opportunity for academics and policy makers to develop a dialogue to identify and explore many of the challenges facing local and regional economies.
期刊最新文献
Regional planning: A failed or flawed project for Africa? Taking advantage of big data science on the horizon FM Editorial Board Why did COVID-19 affect some cities more than others? Insights from Brazil before vaccination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1