Timed barium esophagography to predict recurrent achalasia after peroral endoscopic myotomy: a retrospective study in Thailand.

IF 2.3 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical Endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI:10.5946/ce.2023.236
Tharathorn Suwatthanarak, Chainarong Phalanusitthepa, Chatbadin Thongchuam, Thawatchai Akaraviputh, Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul, Thikhamporn Tawantanakorn, Somchai Leelakusolvong, Monthira Maneerattanaporn, Piyaporn Apisarnthanarak, Jitladda Wasinrat
{"title":"Timed barium esophagography to predict recurrent achalasia after peroral endoscopic myotomy: a retrospective study in Thailand.","authors":"Tharathorn Suwatthanarak, Chainarong Phalanusitthepa, Chatbadin Thongchuam, Thawatchai Akaraviputh, Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul, Thikhamporn Tawantanakorn, Somchai Leelakusolvong, Monthira Maneerattanaporn, Piyaporn Apisarnthanarak, Jitladda Wasinrat","doi":"10.5946/ce.2023.236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disease, for which peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as a promising treatment option; however, recurrence remains a challenge. Timed barium esophagography (TBE) is a useful diagnostic tool and potential outcome predictor of achalasia. This study aimed to determine predictive tools for recurrence after POEM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled achalasia patients who underwent POEM between January 2015 and December 2021. Patients were categorized into two groups using the 1-month post-POEM Eckardt scores and TBE: the discordant group (Eckardt score improved >50%, TBE decreased <50%) and the concordant group (both Eckardt score and TBE improved >50%). Recurrence was defined as a reincrease in the Eckardt score to more than three during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete medical records were available in 30 patients who underwent POEM. Seventeen patients (56.7%) were classified into the discordant group, while 13 patients (43.3%) were in the concordant group. The overall recurrence rate was 11.9% at 1-year, increasing to 23.8% during the extended follow-up. The discordant group had a 6.87 fold higher recurrence rate than the concordant group (52.9% vs. 7.7%, p=0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results strongly suggest that combining the Eckardt score with TBE can effectively predict recurrent achalasia after POEM. Patients in the discordant group had an elevated risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":10351,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":"610-619"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2023.236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disease, for which peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as a promising treatment option; however, recurrence remains a challenge. Timed barium esophagography (TBE) is a useful diagnostic tool and potential outcome predictor of achalasia. This study aimed to determine predictive tools for recurrence after POEM.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled achalasia patients who underwent POEM between January 2015 and December 2021. Patients were categorized into two groups using the 1-month post-POEM Eckardt scores and TBE: the discordant group (Eckardt score improved >50%, TBE decreased <50%) and the concordant group (both Eckardt score and TBE improved >50%). Recurrence was defined as a reincrease in the Eckardt score to more than three during follow-up.

Results: Complete medical records were available in 30 patients who underwent POEM. Seventeen patients (56.7%) were classified into the discordant group, while 13 patients (43.3%) were in the concordant group. The overall recurrence rate was 11.9% at 1-year, increasing to 23.8% during the extended follow-up. The discordant group had a 6.87 fold higher recurrence rate than the concordant group (52.9% vs. 7.7%, p=0.017).

Conclusions: These results strongly suggest that combining the Eckardt score with TBE can effectively predict recurrent achalasia after POEM. Patients in the discordant group had an elevated risk.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测口周内窥镜肌切开术后贲门失弛缓症复发的定时食管钡餐造影:泰国的一项回顾性研究。
背景/目的:贲门失弛缓症是一种罕见的食管运动疾病,口周内镜下肌切开术(POEM)已成为一种很有前景的治疗方案;然而,复发仍然是一个挑战。定时食管钡餐造影(TBE)是一种有用的诊断工具,也是贲门失弛缓症的潜在结果预测指标。本研究旨在确定 POEM 后复发的预测工具:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月间接受 POEM 的贲门失弛缓症患者。根据POEM术后1个月的Eckardt评分和TBE将患者分为两组:不一致组(Eckardt评分提高>50%,TBE降低50%)。复发的定义是随访期间埃卡评分再次升至 3 分以上:30 名接受 POEM 治疗的患者均有完整的医疗记录。17名患者(56.7%)被归为不一致组,13名患者(43.3%)被归为一致组。1年后的总复发率为11.9%,在延长的随访期间复发率增至23.8%。不一致组的复发率比一致组高 6.87 倍(52.9% 对 7.7%,P=0.017):这些结果有力地表明,将 Eckardt 评分与 TBE 结合使用可有效预测 POEM 后的复发性贲门失弛缓症。不一致组患者的风险较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Endoscopy
Clinical Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of body mass index on the outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Predictive factors for the necessity of peroral cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy in the endoscopic treatment of cystic duct confluence stones: a retrospective study in Japan. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided internalization of external pancreatic fistula using balloon-targeted rendezvous technique. Clinical efficacy of endoscopic resection for subepithelial tumors in the esophagogastric junction and gastric cardia: an observational study. Endoscopic assessment of terminal ileum in screening colonoscopy: insights from a retrospective analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1