Drug Inspector as an antibiotic Steward: challenges and recommendations to implement national action plan of Pakistan on antimicrobial resistance.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1080/14787210.2024.2368825
Mishal Bajwa, Shairyar Afzal, Sadaf Areej Sheikh, Zikria Saleem
{"title":"Drug Inspector as an antibiotic Steward: challenges and recommendations to implement national action plan of Pakistan on antimicrobial resistance.","authors":"Mishal Bajwa, Shairyar Afzal, Sadaf Areej Sheikh, Zikria Saleem","doi":"10.1080/14787210.2024.2368825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite significant measures, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Pakistan, struggle to curtail non-prescription antibiotic sales, enforce regulations, and implement National Action Plan (NAP) against antimicrobial resistance (AMR). NAP Pakistan entails drug inspectors (DIs) to ensure prescription-based sales of antibiotics. This study seeks to understand the perspective of DIs regarding antimicrobial sales without prescription, underlying factors, and policy implementation status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study employing a semi-structured interview guide using in-depth interviews with purposively selected 17 DIs was conducted. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and data were analyzed following a thematic analysis framework utilizing MAXQDA 2022 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five main themes emerged after data analysis: (1) drug inspector - the regulator of the antimicrobial armamentarium, (2) the policy context, (3) awareness regarding AMR, (4) barriers to combatting AMR, and (5) the way forward: strategies and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A weak regulatory framework, low level of awareness, quackery, vested interests, and socio-economic factors augment inappropriate antibiotic utilization. Opting for better policies and strengthening the DI fraternity as outlined in NAP Pakistan is recommended. Recognizing drug inspectors as effective surveilling units and mobilizing field force against irrational antibiotic utilization is the need of the hour and requires policy reformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12213,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2024.2368825","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite significant measures, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Pakistan, struggle to curtail non-prescription antibiotic sales, enforce regulations, and implement National Action Plan (NAP) against antimicrobial resistance (AMR). NAP Pakistan entails drug inspectors (DIs) to ensure prescription-based sales of antibiotics. This study seeks to understand the perspective of DIs regarding antimicrobial sales without prescription, underlying factors, and policy implementation status.

Methods: A qualitative study employing a semi-structured interview guide using in-depth interviews with purposively selected 17 DIs was conducted. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and data were analyzed following a thematic analysis framework utilizing MAXQDA 2022 software.

Results: Five main themes emerged after data analysis: (1) drug inspector - the regulator of the antimicrobial armamentarium, (2) the policy context, (3) awareness regarding AMR, (4) barriers to combatting AMR, and (5) the way forward: strategies and recommendations.

Conclusion: A weak regulatory framework, low level of awareness, quackery, vested interests, and socio-economic factors augment inappropriate antibiotic utilization. Opting for better policies and strengthening the DI fraternity as outlined in NAP Pakistan is recommended. Recognizing drug inspectors as effective surveilling units and mobilizing field force against irrational antibiotic utilization is the need of the hour and requires policy reformation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为抗生素管理员的药品检查员:实施巴基斯坦抗菌药耐药性国家行动计划的挑战和建议。
背景:尽管采取了大量措施,但包括巴基斯坦在内的中低收入国家(LMICs)仍在努力遏制非处方抗生素的销售,执行相关法规,并实施国家行动计划(NAP)以防止抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)。巴基斯坦国家行动计划要求药品检查员(DIs)确保根据处方销售抗生素。本研究旨在了解药品稽查员对无处方销售抗菌药的看法、潜在因素和政策执行情况:方法:采用半结构化访谈指南,对特意挑选的 17 名直接责任人进行了深入访谈,从而开展了一项定性研究。对访谈内容进行了逐字记录,并利用 MAXQDA 2022 软件的主题分析框架对数据进行了分析:数据分析后得出了五个主题:(1) 药品检查员--抗菌药物库的监管者,(2) 政策背景,(3) 对 AMR 的认识,(4) 应对 AMR 的障碍,以及 (5) 前进之路:战略和建议:结论:监管框架薄弱、认识水平低、庸医、既得利益和社会经济因素加剧了抗生素的不当使用。建议按照《巴基斯坦国家行动计划》的概述,选择更好的政策并加强 DI 兄弟会。认识到药品检查员是有效的监督单位,并动员实地力量打击不合理使用抗生素的行为是当务之急,需要进行政策改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy (ISSN 1478-7210) provides expert reviews on therapeutics and diagnostics in the treatment of infectious disease. Coverage includes antibiotics, drug resistance, drug therapy, infectious disease medicine, antibacterial, antimicrobial, antifungal and antiviral approaches, and diagnostic tests.
期刊最新文献
Could the next "disease X" be a pandemic of virus-induced encephalitis? What should our first medical response be? The opportunities and challenges of epigenetic approaches to manage herpes simplex infections. Potential activity of nanomaterials to combat SARS-CoV-2 and mucormycosis ‎coinfection‎. Clinical effectiveness of oral antivirals for non-hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients aged 18-60 years. Is self-medication with antibiotics among the public a global concern: a mixed-methods systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1