Computed tomography perfusion as an early predictor of malignant cerebral infarction.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Stroke Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1177/23969873241260965
Alejandro Rodríguez-Vázquez, Carlos Laredo, Luis Reyes, Guillem Dolz, Antonio Doncel-Moriano, Laura Llansó, Salvatore Rudilosso, Laura Llull, Arturo Renú, Sergio Amaro, Ramón Torné, Xabier Urra, Ángel Chamorro
{"title":"Computed tomography perfusion as an early predictor of malignant cerebral infarction.","authors":"Alejandro Rodríguez-Vázquez, Carlos Laredo, Luis Reyes, Guillem Dolz, Antonio Doncel-Moriano, Laura Llansó, Salvatore Rudilosso, Laura Llull, Arturo Renú, Sergio Amaro, Ramón Torné, Xabier Urra, Ángel Chamorro","doi":"10.1177/23969873241260965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (MCI) needs rapid intervention. This study aimed to enhance the prediction of MCI using computed tomography perfusion (CTP) with varied quantitative benchmarks.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 253 patients from a single-center registry presenting with acute, severe, proximal large vessel occlusion studied with whole-brain CTP imaging at hospital arrival within the first 24 h of symptoms-onset. MCI was defined by clinical and imaging criteria, including decreased level of consciousness, anisocoria, death due to cerebral edema, or need for decompressive craniectomy, together with midline shift ⩾6 mm, or infarction of more than 50% of the MCA territory. The predictive accuracy of baseline ASPECTS and CTP quantifications for MCI was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) while <i>F</i>-score was calculated as an indicator of precision and sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-three out of 253 patients (25%) fulfilled MCI criteria and had worse clinical and imaging results than the non-MCI group. The capacity to predict MCI was lower for baseline ASPECTS (AUC 0.83, <i>F</i>-score 0.52, Youden's index 6), than with perfusion-based measures: relative cerebral blood volume threshold <40% (AUC 0.87, <i>F</i>-score 0.71, Youden's index 34 mL) or relative cerebral blood flow threshold <35% (AUC 0.87, <i>F</i>-score 0.62, Youden's index 67 mL). CTP based on rCBV measurements identified twice as many MCI as baseline CT ASPECTS.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>CTP-based quantifications may offer enhanced predictive capabilities for MCI compared to non-contrast baseline CT ASPECTS, potentially improving the monitoring of severe ischemic stroke patients at risk of life-threatening edema and its treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Stroke Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873241260965","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (MCI) needs rapid intervention. This study aimed to enhance the prediction of MCI using computed tomography perfusion (CTP) with varied quantitative benchmarks.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 253 patients from a single-center registry presenting with acute, severe, proximal large vessel occlusion studied with whole-brain CTP imaging at hospital arrival within the first 24 h of symptoms-onset. MCI was defined by clinical and imaging criteria, including decreased level of consciousness, anisocoria, death due to cerebral edema, or need for decompressive craniectomy, together with midline shift ⩾6 mm, or infarction of more than 50% of the MCA territory. The predictive accuracy of baseline ASPECTS and CTP quantifications for MCI was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) while F-score was calculated as an indicator of precision and sensitivity.

Results: Sixty-three out of 253 patients (25%) fulfilled MCI criteria and had worse clinical and imaging results than the non-MCI group. The capacity to predict MCI was lower for baseline ASPECTS (AUC 0.83, F-score 0.52, Youden's index 6), than with perfusion-based measures: relative cerebral blood volume threshold <40% (AUC 0.87, F-score 0.71, Youden's index 34 mL) or relative cerebral blood flow threshold <35% (AUC 0.87, F-score 0.62, Youden's index 67 mL). CTP based on rCBV measurements identified twice as many MCI as baseline CT ASPECTS.

Discussion and conclusion: CTP-based quantifications may offer enhanced predictive capabilities for MCI compared to non-contrast baseline CT ASPECTS, potentially improving the monitoring of severe ischemic stroke patients at risk of life-threatening edema and its treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机断层扫描灌注是恶性脑梗塞的早期预测指标。
简介恶性大脑中动脉梗塞(MCI)需要快速干预。本研究旨在利用计算机断层成像灌注(CTP),以不同的定量基准加强对 MCI 的预测:我们回顾性分析了来自单中心登记处的 253 名急性、严重、近端大血管闭塞患者,他们在症状出现后 24 小时内到达医院时接受了全脑 CTP 成像检查。MCI是根据临床和影像学标准定义的,包括意识水平下降、失神、因脑水肿死亡或需要减压开颅手术,以及中线移位⩾6毫米或MCA区域梗死超过50%。基线 ASPECTS 和 CTP 定量对 MCI 的预测准确性通过接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估,而 F 分数则作为精确度和灵敏度的指标进行计算:253名患者中有63名(25%)符合MCI标准,其临床和影像学结果比非MCI组更差。基线 ASPECTS(AUC 0.83,F-score 0.52,Youden's index 6)预测 MCI 的能力低于基于灌注的测量方法:相对脑血容量阈值 F-score 0.71,Youden's index 34 mL)或相对脑血流量阈值 F-score 0.62,Youden's index 67 mL)。基于 rCBV 测量的 CTP 识别出的 MCI 是基线 CT ASPECTS 识别出的 MCI 的两倍:讨论:与非对比基线 CT ASPECTS 相比,基于 CTP 的量化方法可增强对 MCI 的预测能力,从而有可能改善对有生命危险的严重缺血性卒中患者水肿的监测和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.60%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Launched in 2016 the European Stroke Journal (ESJ) is the official journal of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), a professional non-profit organization with over 1,400 individual members, and affiliations to numerous related national and international societies. ESJ covers clinical stroke research from all fields, including clinical trials, epidemiology, primary and secondary prevention, diagnosis, acute and post-acute management, guidelines, translation of experimental findings into clinical practice, rehabilitation, organisation of stroke care, and societal impact. It is open to authors from all relevant medical and health professions. Article types include review articles, original research, protocols, guidelines, editorials and letters to the Editor. Through ESJ, authors and researchers have gained a new platform for the rapid and professional publication of peer reviewed scientific material of the highest standards; publication in ESJ is highly competitive. The journal and its editorial team has developed excellent cooperation with sister organisations such as the World Stroke Organisation and the International Journal of Stroke, and the American Heart Organization/American Stroke Association and the journal Stroke. ESJ is fully peer-reviewed and is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Issues are published 4 times a year (March, June, September and December) and articles are published OnlineFirst prior to issue publication.
期刊最新文献
Incident dementia in ischaemic stroke patients with early cardiac complications: A propensity-score matched cohort study. Comparing the properties of traditional and novel approaches to the modified Rankin scale: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of smoke-free legislation on stroke risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Initial blood pressure and adverse cardiac events following acute ischaemic stroke: An individual patient data pooled analysis from the VISTA database. Outcomes of different anesthesia techniques in nonagenarians treated with mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion: An inverse probability weighting analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1