"Breaking Bread" With Respondents: Strategies to Increase Response Rates and Create Long-Term Cooperation With Health Clinic Administrators.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Family & Community Health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1097/FCH.0000000000000409
Kelly N Foster, Candace Forbes Bright, Kate Beatty, Jordan de Jong, Kristen Surles, Liane Ventura, Morgan Jones Kidd
{"title":"\"Breaking Bread\" With Respondents: Strategies to Increase Response Rates and Create Long-Term Cooperation With Health Clinic Administrators.","authors":"Kelly N Foster, Candace Forbes Bright, Kate Beatty, Jordan de Jong, Kristen Surles, Liane Ventura, Morgan Jones Kidd","doi":"10.1097/FCH.0000000000000409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>To fully understand the impact of unintended pregnancy, as well as to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of programs targeted at reducing unintended pregnancy, it is critical that researchers be able to collect comprehensive data from health clinics that provide these services in vulnerable communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our paper details recruitment and incentive strategies, as well as the theories that guided them, which allowed us to achieve a high survey response rate among health clinic administrators in public health clinics in 2 Southeastern states-South Carolina and Alabama-both of which have high rates of unintended pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Grounded in organizational theory, and utilizing the Tailored Design Method, we achieved a 68% response rate utilizing paper and web survey administration with multiple contact modes. Our incentive structure comprised both traditional cash-based and food-based incentives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings indicate high response rates are achievable despite high survey burden (ie, detailed information, length of survey). We found that sample screening was critical and that food-based incentives made an impression on respondents that positively impacted the researcher-respondent relationship. Providing detailed methodology and additional literature will assist researchers working with similar populations-a gap in the applied methodological literature that was problematic at the project's onset.</p>","PeriodicalId":47183,"journal":{"name":"Family & Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family & Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: To fully understand the impact of unintended pregnancy, as well as to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of programs targeted at reducing unintended pregnancy, it is critical that researchers be able to collect comprehensive data from health clinics that provide these services in vulnerable communities.

Methods: Our paper details recruitment and incentive strategies, as well as the theories that guided them, which allowed us to achieve a high survey response rate among health clinic administrators in public health clinics in 2 Southeastern states-South Carolina and Alabama-both of which have high rates of unintended pregnancy.

Results: Grounded in organizational theory, and utilizing the Tailored Design Method, we achieved a 68% response rate utilizing paper and web survey administration with multiple contact modes. Our incentive structure comprised both traditional cash-based and food-based incentives.

Conclusions: Findings indicate high response rates are achievable despite high survey burden (ie, detailed information, length of survey). We found that sample screening was critical and that food-based incentives made an impression on respondents that positively impacted the researcher-respondent relationship. Providing detailed methodology and additional literature will assist researchers working with similar populations-a gap in the applied methodological literature that was problematic at the project's onset.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与受访者 "掰面包":提高回复率并与诊所管理人员建立长期合作关系的策略。
背景和目标:为了充分了解意外怀孕的影响,以及评估旨在减少意外怀孕的计划的实施情况和成果,研究人员必须能够从在弱势社区提供这些服务的医疗诊所收集到全面的数据:我们的论文详细介绍了招募和激励策略,以及指导这些策略的理论,这些策略使我们在东南部两个州--南卡罗来纳州和阿拉巴马州--的公共卫生诊所管理人员中取得了很高的调查回复率,这两个州的意外怀孕率都很高:我们以组织理论为基础,采用量身定制的设计方法,通过纸质和网络调查以及多种联系模式,实现了 68% 的回复率。我们的奖励结构包括传统的现金奖励和食品奖励:研究结果表明,尽管调查负担较重(如详细信息、调查长度),但仍可实现较高的回复率。我们发现,样本筛选至关重要,而基于食物的激励措施会给受访者留下深刻印象,从而对研究人员与受访者之间的关系产生积极影响。提供详细的方法论和更多的文献资料将有助于研究人员在类似人群中开展工作,而这正是应用方法论文献中的空白,在项目开始时就存在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Family & Community Health is a practical quarterly which presents creative, multidisciplinary perspectives and approaches for effective public and community health programs. Each issue focuses on a single timely topic and addresses issues of concern to a wide variety of population groups with diverse ethnic backgrounds, including children and the elderly, men and women, and rural and urban communities.
期刊最新文献
"Breaking Bread" With Respondents: Strategies to Increase Response Rates and Create Long-Term Cooperation With Health Clinic Administrators. Nepali Translation, Validity and Reliability Study of the Cohen-Hoberman Inventory of Physical Symptoms for Utilization With Bhutanese Refugees. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Factors Promoting Intergenerational Resilience in Adolescent Youth With Refugee Status. Health Needs Assessment of Unhoused Youth in Charleston, South Carolina. Music Across Generations: Exploring Intergenerational First Nations Musical Practices as Cultural Determinants of Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1