The state of cancer-focused community outreach and engagement (COE): reflections of Black COE directors.

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/jnci/djae138
Hayley S Thompson, Kimlin Tam Ashing, Nadine J Barrett, Monica L Baskin, Lisa Carter-Bawa, Timiya S Nolan, Folakemi T Odedina, Kim F Rhoads, Vanessa B Sheppard, Charnita Zeigler-Johnson
{"title":"The state of cancer-focused community outreach and engagement (COE): reflections of Black COE directors.","authors":"Hayley S Thompson, Kimlin Tam Ashing, Nadine J Barrett, Monica L Baskin, Lisa Carter-Bawa, Timiya S Nolan, Folakemi T Odedina, Kim F Rhoads, Vanessa B Sheppard, Charnita Zeigler-Johnson","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The requirement of community outreach and engagement (COE) as a major component of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Center Support Grant has had an enormous impact on the way NCI-designated cancer centers identify, investigate, and address the needs of their catchment area (CA) communities. Given the wide-ranging diversity of our nation, COE's scope of work (SOW) is extremely demanding and complex. Yet, COE is often marginalized and viewed as void of scientific methods when, in fact, it requires specialized scientific knowledge and a broad range of proficiencies. Black COE scientific directors may be particularly attuned to this marginalization as they have often confronted workplace inequities that resemble the health inequities observed within their cancer center's CA. Thus, Black COE leaders are uniquely positioned to offer insight on the past, present, and future of COE. Key areas discussed include the low involvement of minoritized group members and those with appropriate expertise in national COE leadership; the lack of established, consistent criteria for evaluation of COE components and qualifications of evaluators; the need for substantial financial investment in COE; potential misalignment of community priorities and cancer center objectives; professional development and growth of COE staff and leaders; the expanding scope of COE across their respective cancer centers and CAs; and the need for center-wide involvement in COE and an \"all-hands-on-deck\" approach. These areas warrant thoughtful dialogue as COE evolves, for the benefit and success of all COE leaders. However, this dialogue must include diverse voices representing similarly diverse stakeholders at every level.</p>","PeriodicalId":14809,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae138","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The requirement of community outreach and engagement (COE) as a major component of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Center Support Grant has had an enormous impact on the way NCI-designated cancer centers identify, investigate, and address the needs of their catchment area (CA) communities. Given the wide-ranging diversity of our nation, COE's scope of work (SOW) is extremely demanding and complex. Yet, COE is often marginalized and viewed as void of scientific methods when, in fact, it requires specialized scientific knowledge and a broad range of proficiencies. Black COE scientific directors may be particularly attuned to this marginalization as they have often confronted workplace inequities that resemble the health inequities observed within their cancer center's CA. Thus, Black COE leaders are uniquely positioned to offer insight on the past, present, and future of COE. Key areas discussed include the low involvement of minoritized group members and those with appropriate expertise in national COE leadership; the lack of established, consistent criteria for evaluation of COE components and qualifications of evaluators; the need for substantial financial investment in COE; potential misalignment of community priorities and cancer center objectives; professional development and growth of COE staff and leaders; the expanding scope of COE across their respective cancer centers and CAs; and the need for center-wide involvement in COE and an "all-hands-on-deck" approach. These areas warrant thoughtful dialogue as COE evolves, for the benefit and success of all COE leaders. However, this dialogue must include diverse voices representing similarly diverse stakeholders at every level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以癌症为重点的社区外联和参与(COE)现状:黑人 COE 主任的反思。
作为美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)癌症中心支持补助金的主要组成部分,社区外联与参与(COE)的要求对 NCI 指定的癌症中心识别、调查和满足其集水区(CA)社区需求的方式产生了巨大的影响。鉴于我们国家的广泛多样性,COE 的工作范围极为艰巨和复杂。然而,特遣队所属装备往往被边缘化,被视为缺乏科学方法,而事实上,它需要专业的科学知识和广泛的技能。黑人 COE 科学主任可能对这种边缘化现象尤为敏感,因为他们经常面临工作场所的不平等现象,而这些不平等现象与他们所在癌症中心的 CA 中观察到的健康不平等现象相似。因此,黑人 COE 领导者具有得天独厚的优势,可以就 COE 的过去、现在和未来提供真知灼见。讨论的主要领域包括:少数群体成员和具有相应专业知识的人员很少参与国家 COE 领导工作;缺乏既定的、一致的 COE 评估标准和评估人员的资格;需要对 COE 进行大量财政投资;社区优先事项和癌症中心目标可能不一致;COE 工作人员和领导者的专业发展和成长;COE 在各自癌症中心和 CA 的范围不断扩大;需要整个中心参与 COE 和采取 "全员参与 "的方法。随着 COE 的发展,为了所有 COE 领导者的利益和成功,这些方面都需要进行深思熟虑的对话。然而,这种对话必须包括代表各个层面类似的不同利益相关者的不同声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
203
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is a reputable publication that undergoes a peer-review process. It is available in both print (ISSN: 0027-8874) and online (ISSN: 1460-2105) formats, with 12 issues released annually. The journal's primary aim is to disseminate innovative and important discoveries in the field of cancer research, with specific emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, behavioral, and health outcomes studies. Authors are encouraged to submit reviews, minireviews, and commentaries. The journal ensures that submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous and expedited review to publish scientifically and medically significant findings in a timely manner.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Capacity for Primary Care Research in Cancer Survivorship: National Cancer Institute Meeting Report. Expression of Concern: Delta-Like Ligand 4-Notch Blockade and Tumor Radiation Response. The Diverse Aspects of Uterine Serous Cancer: An NCI workshop on the status of and opportunities for advancement of research. Expression of Concern: Critical Role for Fas-Associated Death Domain-Like Interleukin-1-Converting Enzyme-Like Inhibitory Protein in Anoikis Resistance and Distant Tumor Formation. Comparing characteristics of individuals screened for lung cancer with 2021 vs 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1