Low back pain self-management mobile applications: a systematic review on digital platforms.

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P Pub Date : 2024-06-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0326en
Zulamar Aguiar Cargnin, Dulcinéia Ghizoni Schneider, Michelle Gonçalves de Souza, Mara Ambrosina de Oliveira Vargas, Francis Solange Vieira Tourinho
{"title":"Low back pain self-management mobile applications: a systematic review on digital platforms.","authors":"Zulamar Aguiar Cargnin, Dulcinéia Ghizoni Schneider, Michelle Gonçalves de Souza, Mara Ambrosina de Oliveira Vargas, Francis Solange Vieira Tourinho","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0326en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and analyze the features and quality of self-management support of mobile applications available in Brazil for chronic low back pain in adults.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review on the Apple Store® and Google Play® digital platforms. The Self-Management Support Assessment Tool scale was used to assess self-management support and the Institute for Healthcare Informatics Functionality Score scale was used to assess functionality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen applications were selected, which included around seven self-management skills. The applications that met the majority of self-management support skills were Pathways, Branch, Pancea, Pain Navigator, and Curable. The Curable, Branch and MoovButh applications had the highest scores, with ten features on the functionality scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Some applications have the potential to complement in-person treatment in terms of validity, acceptability and clinical usefulness in pain management. However, barriers such as lack of partnership between healthcare providers and patients, limited evidence-based content, social support, cultural relevance, cost, language, security and privacy can limit their sustained use. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022382686.</p>","PeriodicalId":94195,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":"58 ","pages":"e20230326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0326en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify and analyze the features and quality of self-management support of mobile applications available in Brazil for chronic low back pain in adults.

Method: A systematic review on the Apple Store® and Google Play® digital platforms. The Self-Management Support Assessment Tool scale was used to assess self-management support and the Institute for Healthcare Informatics Functionality Score scale was used to assess functionality.

Results: Seventeen applications were selected, which included around seven self-management skills. The applications that met the majority of self-management support skills were Pathways, Branch, Pancea, Pain Navigator, and Curable. The Curable, Branch and MoovButh applications had the highest scores, with ten features on the functionality scale.

Conclusion: Some applications have the potential to complement in-person treatment in terms of validity, acceptability and clinical usefulness in pain management. However, barriers such as lack of partnership between healthcare providers and patients, limited evidence-based content, social support, cultural relevance, cost, language, security and privacy can limit their sustained use. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022382686.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰背痛自我管理移动应用程序:数字平台系统综述。
目的确定并分析巴西现有的针对成人慢性腰背痛的移动应用程序的功能和自我管理支持的质量:方法:对 Apple Store® 和 Google Play® 数字平台进行系统回顾。自我管理支持评估工具量表用于评估自我管理支持,医疗保健信息学研究所功能评分量表用于评估功能:结果:共选取了 17 款应用程序,其中包括约 7 种自我管理技能。符合大多数自我管理支持技能的应用程序是 Pathways、Branch、Pancea、Pain Navigator 和 Curable。Curable、Branch 和 MoovButh 应用程序得分最高,在功能量表上有 10 项功能:结论:在疼痛管理的有效性、可接受性和临床实用性方面,一些应用软件有可能对现场治疗起到补充作用。然而,医疗服务提供者与患者之间缺乏合作、循证内容有限、社会支持、文化相关性、成本、语言、安全性和隐私等障碍可能会限制其持续使用。PROSPERO 注册:CRD42022382686.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advanced practice nursing: international gator nursing week. Attributes of primary health care in the view of health professionals: a scoping review. Dimensions of nursing-midwifery care during the COVID-19 pandemic in light of Jean Watson. Quality of nursing care in pain management in orthopedic surgical patients: a scoping review. Heidegger's philosophical foundations and his contribution to palliative nursing and spiritual care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1