A community health worker led diabetes self-management education program: Reducing patient and system burden

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of diabetes and its complications Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2024.108794
Laura Porterfield , Xiaoying Yu , Victoria Warren , Michael E. Bowen , Carolyn Smith-Morris , Elizabeth M. Vaughan
{"title":"A community health worker led diabetes self-management education program: Reducing patient and system burden","authors":"Laura Porterfield ,&nbsp;Xiaoying Yu ,&nbsp;Victoria Warren ,&nbsp;Michael E. Bowen ,&nbsp;Carolyn Smith-Morris ,&nbsp;Elizabeth M. Vaughan","doi":"10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2024.108794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Conduct a secondary analysis of the <em>TIME</em> (Telehealth-supported, Integrated Community Health Workers (CHWs), Medication access, diabetes Education) <em>made simple</em> trial (SIMPLE) to evaluate healthcare utilization and explore variables that may have influenced HbA1c.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants (<em>N</em> = 134 [67/group]) were low-income, uninsured Hispanics with or at risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus. We included in-person and telehealth clinician visits, other visits, missed visits, orders placed, and guideline-adherence (e.g., vaccinations, quarterly HbA1c for uncontrolled diabetes). Using multivariable models, we explored for associations between HbA1c changes and these measures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The control arm had higher missed visits rates (intervention: 45 %; control: 56 %; <em>p</em> = 0.007) and missed telehealth appointments (intervention: 10 %; control: 27.4 %; <em>p</em> = 0.04). The intervention group received more COVID vaccinations than the control (<em>p</em> = 0.005). Other health measures were non-significant between groups. Intervention individuals' HbA1c improved with more missed visits (−0.60 %; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) and worsened with improved guideline-adherent HbA1c measurements (HbA1c: 1.2 %; <em>p</em> = 0.057). The control group had non-significant HbA1c associations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings suggest that the SIMPLE trial's improved HbA1c levels stemmed from a CHW-driven intervention and not additional healthcare contact. Exploratory outcomes resulted in seemingly counterintuitive HbA1c associations with missed visits and guideline-adherent measurements; these may suggest that an intervention that enhances communication provides support to reduce the amount of follow-up needed by participants without sacrificing clinical improvements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of diabetes and its complications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of diabetes and its complications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105687272400120X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Conduct a secondary analysis of the TIME (Telehealth-supported, Integrated Community Health Workers (CHWs), Medication access, diabetes Education) made simple trial (SIMPLE) to evaluate healthcare utilization and explore variables that may have influenced HbA1c.

Methods

Participants (N = 134 [67/group]) were low-income, uninsured Hispanics with or at risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus. We included in-person and telehealth clinician visits, other visits, missed visits, orders placed, and guideline-adherence (e.g., vaccinations, quarterly HbA1c for uncontrolled diabetes). Using multivariable models, we explored for associations between HbA1c changes and these measures.

Results

The control arm had higher missed visits rates (intervention: 45 %; control: 56 %; p = 0.007) and missed telehealth appointments (intervention: 10 %; control: 27.4 %; p = 0.04). The intervention group received more COVID vaccinations than the control (p = 0.005). Other health measures were non-significant between groups. Intervention individuals' HbA1c improved with more missed visits (−0.60 %; p < 0.01) and worsened with improved guideline-adherent HbA1c measurements (HbA1c: 1.2 %; p = 0.057). The control group had non-significant HbA1c associations.

Conclusions

Findings suggest that the SIMPLE trial's improved HbA1c levels stemmed from a CHW-driven intervention and not additional healthcare contact. Exploratory outcomes resulted in seemingly counterintuitive HbA1c associations with missed visits and guideline-adherent measurements; these may suggest that an intervention that enhances communication provides support to reduce the amount of follow-up needed by participants without sacrificing clinical improvements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区医疗工作者领导的糖尿病自我管理教育计划:减轻患者和系统负担
目的对 TIME(远程医疗支持、综合社区保健员 (CHW)、用药途径、糖尿病教育)简化试验(SIMPLE)进行二次分析,评估医疗保健利用率并探讨可能影响 HbA1c 的变量。方法参与者(N = 134 [67/ 组])为低收入、无保险的西班牙裔 2 型糖尿病患者或高危患者。我们纳入了临床医生的亲诊和远程医疗就诊、其他就诊、错过的就诊、下达的医嘱以及指南的遵守情况(如疫苗接种、未控制的糖尿病患者的季度 HbA1c)。结果对照组的漏诊率较高(干预组:45%;对照组:56%;P = 0.007),远程医疗预约的漏诊率也较高(干预组:10%;对照组:27.4%;P = 0.04)。干预组比对照组接种了更多的 COVID 疫苗(p = 0.005)。其他健康指标在组间无显著差异。干预组患者的 HbA1c 因错过就诊次数增多而有所改善(-0.60 %; p < 0.01),因更严格地按照指南测量 HbA1c 而有所恶化(HbA1c:1.2 %; p = 0.057)。结论研究结果表明,SIMPLE 试验中 HbA1c 水平的改善源于 CHW 驱动的干预措施,而非额外的医疗保健接触。探索性结果表明,HbA1c 与错过就诊时间和遵照指南进行的测量之间存在看似违反直觉的关联;这些结果可能表明,加强沟通的干预措施可为减少参与者所需的随访量提供支持,而不会牺牲临床改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of diabetes and its complications
Journal of diabetes and its complications 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
153
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications (JDC) is a journal for health care practitioners and researchers, that publishes original research about the pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus and its complications. JDC also publishes articles on physiological and molecular aspects of glucose homeostasis. The primary purpose of JDC is to act as a source of information usable by diabetes practitioners and researchers to increase their knowledge about mechanisms of diabetes and complications development, and promote better management of people with diabetes who are at risk for those complications. Manuscripts submitted to JDC can report any aspect of basic, translational or clinical research as well as epidemiology. Topics can range broadly from early prediabetes to late-stage complicated diabetes. Topics relevant to basic/translational reports include pancreatic islet dysfunction and insulin resistance, altered adipose tissue function in diabetes, altered neuronal control of glucose homeostasis and mechanisms of drug action. Topics relevant to diabetic complications include diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy; peripheral vascular disease and coronary heart disease; gastrointestinal disorders, renal failure and impotence; and hypertension and hyperlipidemia.
期刊最新文献
Clinical features and outcomes of patients diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) who were hospitalized for conditions outside of internal medicine Pioglitazone increases risk of ischemic heart disease in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin Effects of probiotics and fibers on markers of nephropathy, inflammation, intestinal barrier dysfunction and endothelial dysfunction in individuals with type 1 diabetes and albuminuria. The ProFOS Study Precision diabetology: Where do we stand now? Effects of moderate-intensity aerobic training on cardiac structure and function in type 2 mellitus diabetic rats: Based on echocardiography and speckle tracking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1