Do public disclosures of investments in tax planning attract monitoring by tax authorities?

IF 3.3 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Accounting and Public Policy Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107224
Eric T. Rapley , Pradeep Sapkota , James Stekelberg
{"title":"Do public disclosures of investments in tax planning attract monitoring by tax authorities?","authors":"Eric T. Rapley ,&nbsp;Pradeep Sapkota ,&nbsp;James Stekelberg","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Given the returns to investments in tax planning documented by prior studies, we predict that disclosures of investments in tax planning required by the SEC could inform tax authorities about the benefits of examining particular firms. Consistent with this notion, we find that the amount of tax non-audit services fees a firm reports in the current year is significantly associated with multiple measures of tax authority monitoring over the subsequent years. This result is stronger among firms with greater bargaining power who may be able to demand more aggressive tax planning advice from their auditors. Additionally, we find that our results are concentrated within non-audit fees related to tax planning, rather than tax compliance. Our findings contribute to research on tax enforcement and auditor-provided tax services, and have practical implications for firms considering purchasing tax services from their auditors and corporate stakeholders assessing firms’ potential exposure to tax enforcement. Further, our study has public policy implications by providing evidence of an unintended consequence of SEC disclosure requirements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 107224"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278425424000474","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the returns to investments in tax planning documented by prior studies, we predict that disclosures of investments in tax planning required by the SEC could inform tax authorities about the benefits of examining particular firms. Consistent with this notion, we find that the amount of tax non-audit services fees a firm reports in the current year is significantly associated with multiple measures of tax authority monitoring over the subsequent years. This result is stronger among firms with greater bargaining power who may be able to demand more aggressive tax planning advice from their auditors. Additionally, we find that our results are concentrated within non-audit fees related to tax planning, rather than tax compliance. Our findings contribute to research on tax enforcement and auditor-provided tax services, and have practical implications for firms considering purchasing tax services from their auditors and corporate stakeholders assessing firms’ potential exposure to tax enforcement. Further, our study has public policy implications by providing evidence of an unintended consequence of SEC disclosure requirements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公开披露税务筹划投资是否会引起税务机关的监督?
鉴于之前的研究记录了税务筹划投资的回报,我们预测,美国证券交易委员会要求披露的税务筹划投资信息可以让税务机关了解审查特定公司的好处。与这一观点一致的是,我们发现公司当年报告的税务非审计服务费金额与税务机关在随后几年中的多种监控措施显著相关。这一结果在议价能力较强的公司中更为明显,这些公司可能会要求审计师提供更积极的税务筹划建议。此外,我们还发现,我们的研究结果主要集中在与税收筹划相关的非审计费用上,而不是税收遵从上。我们的研究结果有助于税收执法和审计师提供的税务服务方面的研究,对考虑从审计师处购买税务服务的公司和评估公司潜在税收执法风险的公司利益相关者具有实际意义。此外,我们的研究还为证监会披露要求的意外后果提供了证据,从而对公共政策产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting and Public Policy publishes research papers focusing on the intersection between accounting and public policy. Preference is given to papers illuminating through theoretical or empirical analysis, the effects of accounting on public policy and vice-versa. Subjects treated in this journal include the interface of accounting with economics, political science, sociology, or law. The Journal includes a section entitled Accounting Letters. This section publishes short research articles that should not exceed approximately 3,000 words. The objective of this section is to facilitate the rapid dissemination of important accounting research. Accordingly, articles submitted to this section will be reviewed within fours weeks of receipt, revisions will be limited to one, and publication will occur within four months of acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Blockchain adoption and corporate financial reporting quality Crowding-out or Calling-out? The influence of mandatory industry-related firm-specific information disclosure on analyst reports Editorial Board Attention to corporate disclosure and earnings Management: Evidence from downloads of SEC filings Consolidation in national accounts: Implications for municipal enterprises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1