Assessment of the utilization of real-time prescription benefits for patient cost savings within an outpatient setting

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100460
Rachel Reise , Asinamai M Ndai , Marvin A Dewar , Anzeela M Schentrup , Julia Yang , Scott Martin Vouri
{"title":"Assessment of the utilization of real-time prescription benefits for patient cost savings within an outpatient setting","authors":"Rachel Reise ,&nbsp;Asinamai M Ndai ,&nbsp;Marvin A Dewar ,&nbsp;Anzeela M Schentrup ,&nbsp;Julia Yang ,&nbsp;Scott Martin Vouri","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study evaluates the impact of Real-Time Prescription Benefits (RTPB), a tool integrated into electronic health records (EHRs), on patient out-of-pocket costs in an academic institution. RTPB provides prescribers with alternative, less expensive medications based on insurance plans. The primary measure was cost-savings, defined as the difference between the out-of-pocket cost of the prescribed medication and its alternative.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of prescriptions from outpatient clinics in a university-based health system was conducted between May 2020 and July 2021. Prescriptions were analyzed at the 2nd level of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. Costs were standardized to a 30-day supply. Standardized cost and total cost per prescription, and overall savings for the top 20 medication classes at the 2nd ATC level were calculated. The overall impact of RTPB was estimated based on selecting the least expensive alternative suggested by RTPB.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study found that RTPB information was provided for 22% of prescriptions, with suggested alternatives for 1.26%. Among prescriptions with an alternative selected, the standardized average cost saving was $38.83. The study realized $15,416 in patient total cost savings. If the least expensive RTPB-suggested alternative were chosen for all prescriptions, an estimated $276,386 could have been saved. Psychoanaleptic and psycholeptic medications were the most prescribed with an alternative, with most savings in specialty drugs like anthelmintic and immunostimulant medications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study highlights the importance of RTPB in reducing patient costs. It reports patient cost-savings with RTPB in prescribing decisions. Future research could explore the impact of RTPB on medication adherence using pharmacy claims data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266727662400057X/pdfft?md5=81c14271a8579530f13c2865c221d25a&pid=1-s2.0-S266727662400057X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266727662400057X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study evaluates the impact of Real-Time Prescription Benefits (RTPB), a tool integrated into electronic health records (EHRs), on patient out-of-pocket costs in an academic institution. RTPB provides prescribers with alternative, less expensive medications based on insurance plans. The primary measure was cost-savings, defined as the difference between the out-of-pocket cost of the prescribed medication and its alternative.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of prescriptions from outpatient clinics in a university-based health system was conducted between May 2020 and July 2021. Prescriptions were analyzed at the 2nd level of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. Costs were standardized to a 30-day supply. Standardized cost and total cost per prescription, and overall savings for the top 20 medication classes at the 2nd ATC level were calculated. The overall impact of RTPB was estimated based on selecting the least expensive alternative suggested by RTPB.

Results

The study found that RTPB information was provided for 22% of prescriptions, with suggested alternatives for 1.26%. Among prescriptions with an alternative selected, the standardized average cost saving was $38.83. The study realized $15,416 in patient total cost savings. If the least expensive RTPB-suggested alternative were chosen for all prescriptions, an estimated $276,386 could have been saved. Psychoanaleptic and psycholeptic medications were the most prescribed with an alternative, with most savings in specialty drugs like anthelmintic and immunostimulant medications.

Conclusion

The study highlights the importance of RTPB in reducing patient costs. It reports patient cost-savings with RTPB in prescribing decisions. Future research could explore the impact of RTPB on medication adherence using pharmacy claims data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估在门诊环境中利用实时处方福利节省患者费用的情况
背景本研究评估了实时处方利益(RTPB)对学术机构中患者自付费用的影响,实时处方利益是一种集成到电子健康记录(EHR)中的工具。RTPB 根据保险计划为处方者提供价格较低的替代药物。方法在 2020 年 5 月至 2021 年 7 月期间,对某大学医疗系统门诊处方进行了回顾性分析。处方按照解剖治疗化学(ATC)分类系统的第二级进行分析。成本标准化为 30 天用量。计算了每张处方的标准化成本和总成本,以及 ATC 二级前 20 种药物类别的总体节省情况。研究发现,22% 的处方提供了 RTPB 信息,1.26% 的处方提供了建议的替代方案。在选择了替代品的处方中,标准化的平均成本节约为 38.83 美元。这项研究为患者节省了 15,416 美元的总费用。如果所有处方都选择 RTPB 建议的最便宜的替代方案,估计可节省 276386 美元。使用替代方案的处方中,精神药物和精神科药物最多,而抗虫药和免疫刺激药物等专科药物节省的费用最多。研究报告称,在处方决策中使用 RTPB 可为患者节省费用。未来的研究可以利用药房理赔数据探讨 RTPB 对坚持用药的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Montelukast deprescribing in outpatient specialty clinics: A single center cross-sectional study Appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand Comparing nursing medication rounds before and after implementation of automated dispensing cabinets: A time and motion study Translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the general medication adherence scale (GMAS) in patients with high blood pressure A cross-sectional survey exploring organizational readiness to implement community pharmacy-based opioid counseling and naloxone services in rural versus urban settings in Alabama
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1