{"title":"Passenger satisfaction assessment in the aviation industry using Type-2 fuzzy TOPSIS","authors":"Sezin Ozturk Usun , Sema Akin Bas , Busra Meniz , Beyza Ahlatcioglu Ozkok","doi":"10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assessment of passenger satisfaction (PS) ratings is a noteworthy component of evaluating the service quality metrics used by airline companies. One of the most popular ways for airline companies to gauge customer satisfaction (CS) and determine what needs to be improved is by conducting surveys of their customers. In this study, we used an extended version of the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) technique, which is one of the most important multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, with type-2 fuzzy sets to evaluate PS for the first time in the literature. Using this systematic technique, we have reflected to the model the uncertainty that may affect the evaluations of the passengers when making their assessments. Our study is considerably beneficial since it enables not only the PS evaluation of airline companies but also it is a generalization to analyze any type of CS that may be found in the aviation sector. We used our technique on questionnaires answered by 129,880 US Airlines passengers concerning 14 criteria and compared our results with studies in the literature using the same dataset. Unlike the literature, in this paper, passenger segmentation has been done to obtain effective results. Different scenarios are created for each emerging segment. While creating the scenarios, the passenger profiles of overall satisfaction, flight class, and customer loyalty are considered and different priorities are given to these variables in each scenario. We have utilized these scenarios to help airlines determine the demands of each consumer segment to improve service quality. Our study provides airline companies with an integrated decision system, with a holistic perspective, in which they can take into account not only their customers as one type, but also the differences they may experience in evaluating both their flight habits and flight experiences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Air Transport Management","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 102630"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Air Transport Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699724000954","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Assessment of passenger satisfaction (PS) ratings is a noteworthy component of evaluating the service quality metrics used by airline companies. One of the most popular ways for airline companies to gauge customer satisfaction (CS) and determine what needs to be improved is by conducting surveys of their customers. In this study, we used an extended version of the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) technique, which is one of the most important multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, with type-2 fuzzy sets to evaluate PS for the first time in the literature. Using this systematic technique, we have reflected to the model the uncertainty that may affect the evaluations of the passengers when making their assessments. Our study is considerably beneficial since it enables not only the PS evaluation of airline companies but also it is a generalization to analyze any type of CS that may be found in the aviation sector. We used our technique on questionnaires answered by 129,880 US Airlines passengers concerning 14 criteria and compared our results with studies in the literature using the same dataset. Unlike the literature, in this paper, passenger segmentation has been done to obtain effective results. Different scenarios are created for each emerging segment. While creating the scenarios, the passenger profiles of overall satisfaction, flight class, and customer loyalty are considered and different priorities are given to these variables in each scenario. We have utilized these scenarios to help airlines determine the demands of each consumer segment to improve service quality. Our study provides airline companies with an integrated decision system, with a holistic perspective, in which they can take into account not only their customers as one type, but also the differences they may experience in evaluating both their flight habits and flight experiences.
乘客满意度(PS)评估是航空公司服务质量评估指标中值得注意的一个组成部分。航空公司衡量客户满意度(CS)和确定需要改进之处的最常用方法之一是对客户进行调查。在本研究中,我们使用了最重要的多标准决策(MCDM)方法之一--TOPSIS(Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution)技术的扩展版本,并首次在文献中使用了 2 型模糊集来评估 PS。利用这一系统技术,我们在模型中反映了乘客在做出评价时可能会影响其评价的不确定性。我们的研究非常有益,因为它不仅能对航空公司的 PS 进行评估,还能对航空业中任何类型的 CS 进行分析。我们对 129,880 名美国航空公司乘客就 14 项标准所做的问卷调查使用了我们的技术,并将我们的结果与使用相同数据集的文献研究进行了比较。与文献不同的是,本文对乘客进行了细分,以获得有效结果。为每个新出现的细分市场创建了不同的情景。在创建情景时,考虑了乘客的整体满意度、航班舱位和客户忠诚度,并在每个情景中对这些变量赋予了不同的优先级。我们利用这些情景帮助航空公司确定各消费群体的需求,以提高服务质量。我们的研究为航空公司提供了一个具有整体视角的综合决策系统,使其不仅能将客户视为一种类型,还能考虑到他们在评价飞行习惯和飞行体验时可能遇到的差异。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Air Transport Management (JATM) sets out to address, through high quality research articles and authoritative commentary, the major economic, management and policy issues facing the air transport industry today. It offers practitioners and academics an international and dynamic forum for analysis and discussion of these issues, linking research and practice and stimulating interaction between the two. The refereed papers in the journal cover all the major sectors of the industry (airlines, airports, air traffic management) as well as related areas such as tourism management and logistics. Papers are blind reviewed, normally by two referees, chosen for their specialist knowledge. The journal provides independent, original and rigorous analysis in the areas of: • Policy, regulation and law • Strategy • Operations • Marketing • Economics and finance • Sustainability