Exploring Classifiers with Differentiable Decision Boundary Maps

IF 2.7 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Computer Graphics Forum Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1111/cgf.15109
A. Machado, M. Behrisch, A. Telea
{"title":"Exploring Classifiers with Differentiable Decision Boundary Maps","authors":"A. Machado,&nbsp;M. Behrisch,&nbsp;A. Telea","doi":"10.1111/cgf.15109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Explaining Machine Learning (ML) — and especially Deep Learning (DL) — classifiers' decisions is a subject of interest across fields due to the increasing ubiquity of such models in computing systems. As models get increasingly complex, relying on sophisticated machinery to recognize data patterns, explaining their behavior becomes more difficult. Directly visualizing classifier behavior is in general infeasible, as they create partitions of the data space, which is typically high dimensional. In recent years, Decision Boundary Maps (DBMs) have been developed, taking advantage of projection and inverse projection techniques. By being able to map 2D points back to the data space and subsequently run a classifier, DBMs represent a slice of classifier outputs. However, we recognize that DBMs without additional explanatory views are limited in their applicability. In this work, we propose augmenting the naive DBM generating process with views that provide more in-depth information about classifier behavior, such as whether the training procedure is locally stable. We describe our proposed views — which we term Differentiable Decision Boundary Maps — over a running example, explaining how our work enables drawing new and useful conclusions from these dense maps. We further demonstrate the value of these conclusions by showing how useful they would be in carrying out or preventing a dataset poisoning attack. We thus provide evidence of the ability of our proposed views to make DBMs significantly more trustworthy and interpretable, increasing their utility as a model understanding tool.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10687,"journal":{"name":"Computer Graphics Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cgf.15109","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Graphics Forum","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cgf.15109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Explaining Machine Learning (ML) — and especially Deep Learning (DL) — classifiers' decisions is a subject of interest across fields due to the increasing ubiquity of such models in computing systems. As models get increasingly complex, relying on sophisticated machinery to recognize data patterns, explaining their behavior becomes more difficult. Directly visualizing classifier behavior is in general infeasible, as they create partitions of the data space, which is typically high dimensional. In recent years, Decision Boundary Maps (DBMs) have been developed, taking advantage of projection and inverse projection techniques. By being able to map 2D points back to the data space and subsequently run a classifier, DBMs represent a slice of classifier outputs. However, we recognize that DBMs without additional explanatory views are limited in their applicability. In this work, we propose augmenting the naive DBM generating process with views that provide more in-depth information about classifier behavior, such as whether the training procedure is locally stable. We describe our proposed views — which we term Differentiable Decision Boundary Maps — over a running example, explaining how our work enables drawing new and useful conclusions from these dense maps. We further demonstrate the value of these conclusions by showing how useful they would be in carrying out or preventing a dataset poisoning attack. We thus provide evidence of the ability of our proposed views to make DBMs significantly more trustworthy and interpretable, increasing their utility as a model understanding tool.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用可变决策边界图探索分类器
解释机器学习(ML)--尤其是深度学习(DL)--分类器的决策是各个领域都感兴趣的话题,因为这类模型在计算系统中越来越普遍。随着模型变得越来越复杂,依靠复杂的机器来识别数据模式,解释它们的行为变得越来越困难。直接可视化分类器的行为一般是不可行的,因为它们会创建数据空间的分区,而数据空间通常是高维的。近年来,利用投影和反投影技术,人们开发出了决策边界图(DBM)。通过将二维点映射回数据空间并随后运行分类器,DBM 代表了分类器输出的切片。然而,我们认识到,没有附加解释视图的 DBM 在适用性方面受到了限制。在这项工作中,我们建议在天真的 DBM 生成过程中增加一些视图,这些视图可以提供有关分类器行为的更深入的信息,例如训练过程是否局部稳定。我们在一个运行示例中描述了我们提出的视图(我们称之为可微分决策边界图),并解释了我们的工作是如何从这些密集的地图中得出新的有用结论的。我们进一步展示了这些结论在实施或防止数据集中毒攻击中的实用价值。因此,我们提供的证据表明,我们提出的观点能够使 DBM 的可信度和可解释性大大提高,从而增强其作为模型理解工具的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Graphics Forum
Computer Graphics Forum 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Graphics Forum is the official journal of Eurographics, published in cooperation with Wiley-Blackwell, and is a unique, international source of information for computer graphics professionals interested in graphics developments worldwide. It is now one of the leading journals for researchers, developers and users of computer graphics in both commercial and academic environments. The journal reports on the latest developments in the field throughout the world and covers all aspects of the theory, practice and application of computer graphics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Hierarchical Spherical Cross-Parameterization for Deforming Characters Deep SVBRDF Acquisition and Modelling: A Survey EBPVis: Visual Analytics of Economic Behavior Patterns in a Virtual Experimental Environment Mix-Max: A Content-Aware Operator for Real-Time Texture Transitions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1