Efficiency of inoculation methods for the assessment of bacterial halo blight in coffee seedlings

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES Journal of Phytopathology Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1111/jph.13336
J. M. Oliveira, E. A. Pozza, L. L. Belan, M. L. O. Freitas, V. M. Tedardi
{"title":"Efficiency of inoculation methods for the assessment of bacterial halo blight in coffee seedlings","authors":"J. M. Oliveira,&nbsp;E. A. Pozza,&nbsp;L. L. Belan,&nbsp;M. L. O. Freitas,&nbsp;V. M. Tedardi","doi":"10.1111/jph.13336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bacterial halo blight (BHB), caused by <i>Pseudomonas coronafaciens</i> pv. <i>garcae</i> (Pcg), is one of the most significant diseases affecting coffee trees worldwide, resulting in considerable damage and notable losses within coffee production systems. Further research into the epidemiology and aetiology of BHB in coffee plants is essential for developing effective management strategies. Understanding the efficiency of each inoculation methodology in inducing symptoms is crucial for advancing this research. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the efficiency of seven Pcg inoculation methods using five concentrations to enhance the highest BHB intensity. The experimental design was a complete randomized block design in a factorial (7 × 5) variance analysis with four replications. The first three pairs of leaves of coffee seedlings of the cultivar Catuaí Vermelho IAC-99 were inoculated and evaluated for the incidence and severity of BHB. The inoculation methods of Pcg by injury provided higher BHB AUDPCI and AUDPCS values. Among these, the inoculum injection and multi-needle wounding at inoculum concentrations of 1.6 × 10<sup>9</sup> CFU mL<sup>−1</sup> demonstrated higher disease intensity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phytopathology","volume":"172 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jph.13336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bacterial halo blight (BHB), caused by Pseudomonas coronafaciens pv. garcae (Pcg), is one of the most significant diseases affecting coffee trees worldwide, resulting in considerable damage and notable losses within coffee production systems. Further research into the epidemiology and aetiology of BHB in coffee plants is essential for developing effective management strategies. Understanding the efficiency of each inoculation methodology in inducing symptoms is crucial for advancing this research. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the efficiency of seven Pcg inoculation methods using five concentrations to enhance the highest BHB intensity. The experimental design was a complete randomized block design in a factorial (7 × 5) variance analysis with four replications. The first three pairs of leaves of coffee seedlings of the cultivar Catuaí Vermelho IAC-99 were inoculated and evaluated for the incidence and severity of BHB. The inoculation methods of Pcg by injury provided higher BHB AUDPCI and AUDPCS values. Among these, the inoculum injection and multi-needle wounding at inoculum concentrations of 1.6 × 109 CFU mL−1 demonstrated higher disease intensity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估咖啡幼苗细菌性晕疫病的接种方法的效率
由 Pseudomonas coronafaciens pv. garcae(Pcg)引起的细菌性晕疫病(BHB)是影响全球咖啡树的最主要病害之一,在咖啡生产系统中造成了相当大的破坏和显著的损失。要制定有效的管理策略,就必须进一步研究咖啡植物中 BHB 的流行病学和病原学。了解每种接种方法在诱发症状方面的效率对于推进这项研究至关重要。因此,本研究旨在评估使用五种浓度的七种 Pcg 接种方法的效率,以提高最高的 BHB 强度。实验设计为完全随机区组设计,采用因子(7 × 5)方差分析,四次重复。接种了 Catuaí Vermelho IAC-99 栽培品种咖啡幼苗的前三对叶片,并对 BHB 的发生率和严重程度进行了评估。通过损伤接种 Pcg 的方法可获得较高的 BHB AUDPCI 和 AUDPCS 值。其中,接种体浓度为 1.6 × 109 CFU mL-1 的接种体注射和多针刺伤的病害强度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Phytopathology
Journal of Phytopathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Phytopathology publishes original and review articles on all scientific aspects of applied phytopathology in agricultural and horticultural crops. Preference is given to contributions improving our understanding of the biotic and abiotic determinants of plant diseases, including epidemics and damage potential, as a basis for innovative disease management, modelling and forecasting. This includes practical aspects and the development of methods for disease diagnosis as well as infection bioassays. Studies at the population, organism, physiological, biochemical and molecular genetic level are welcome. The journal scope comprises the pathology and epidemiology of plant diseases caused by microbial pathogens, viruses and nematodes. Accepted papers should advance our conceptual knowledge of plant diseases, rather than presenting descriptive or screening data unrelated to phytopathological mechanisms or functions. Results from unrepeated experimental conditions or data with no or inappropriate statistical processing will not be considered. Authors are encouraged to look at past issues to ensure adherence to the standards of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Nanoparticles Impact on the Morphogenetics of Cicer arietinum L. Offshoot Decline and Bud Rot of Date Palm Caused by Three Species of Enterobacteriaceae An Economic and Reliable PCR Approach to Distinguish the Primary Pathogens Armillaria mellea and A. ostoyae From Other European Armillaria Species Isolation and Identification of Pathogenic Microorganisms Causing Post-Harvest Disease of Garlic (Allium sativum L.) in Ninh Thuan Province, Vietnam Severity and Reaction to Bacterial Spot of Tomato Hybrids For Industrial Processing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1