Individual and group behavioral responses to nutritional state and context in a social fish

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioural Processes Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105059
Ling-Qing Zeng , Hong Ling , Shi-Jian Fu , De-Yong Pu , Shaun S. Killen
{"title":"Individual and group behavioral responses to nutritional state and context in a social fish","authors":"Ling-Qing Zeng ,&nbsp;Hong Ling ,&nbsp;Shi-Jian Fu ,&nbsp;De-Yong Pu ,&nbsp;Shaun S. Killen","doi":"10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding how animal collectives and societies form and function is a fundamental goal in animal biology. To date, research examining fish shoaling behavior has focused mostly on the general principles and ecological relevance of the phenomeon, while the ways in which physiological state (e.g., nutrition) affects collective behavior remain overlooked. Here, we investigated the shoaling behavior of common minnows (<em>Phoxinus phoxinus</em>) with three different nutritional states (control treatment: fasting for 24 h, fasting treatment: fasting for 7 days, and digestion treatment: 1 h after satiation feeding) across two ecological contexts (i.e., without and with food). No effects of either nutritional state or context were found on swimming speed, but the acceleration was greater in the digestion group than in the control group, with that in the fasting group being intermediate. Similar to change tendency in group length and group width of shoals, both interindividual distance and nearest neighbor distance were also greater in the fasting group than in the digestion group, suggesting that fasting and digestion may exert opposite driving forces on group cohesion. However, neither nutritional state nor context influenced the group area, group speed, group percent time moving, or group polarization. Both the foraging efficiency and the percentage of food items consumed by the fish shoals were greater in the fasting and control groups than in the digestion group. Our study suggested that one week of hunger and the energetically demanding stage of food digestion tend to have opposite influences on group shape, while the social foraging context does not influence the individual and group behavior of fish.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8746,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Processes","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 105059"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Processes","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635724000743","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding how animal collectives and societies form and function is a fundamental goal in animal biology. To date, research examining fish shoaling behavior has focused mostly on the general principles and ecological relevance of the phenomeon, while the ways in which physiological state (e.g., nutrition) affects collective behavior remain overlooked. Here, we investigated the shoaling behavior of common minnows (Phoxinus phoxinus) with three different nutritional states (control treatment: fasting for 24 h, fasting treatment: fasting for 7 days, and digestion treatment: 1 h after satiation feeding) across two ecological contexts (i.e., without and with food). No effects of either nutritional state or context were found on swimming speed, but the acceleration was greater in the digestion group than in the control group, with that in the fasting group being intermediate. Similar to change tendency in group length and group width of shoals, both interindividual distance and nearest neighbor distance were also greater in the fasting group than in the digestion group, suggesting that fasting and digestion may exert opposite driving forces on group cohesion. However, neither nutritional state nor context influenced the group area, group speed, group percent time moving, or group polarization. Both the foraging efficiency and the percentage of food items consumed by the fish shoals were greater in the fasting and control groups than in the digestion group. Our study suggested that one week of hunger and the energetically demanding stage of food digestion tend to have opposite influences on group shape, while the social foraging context does not influence the individual and group behavior of fish.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会性鱼类个体和群体对营养状态和环境的行为反应。
了解动物集体和社会如何形成和运作是动物生物学的一个基本目标。迄今为止,对鱼类趋群行为的研究主要集中在该现象的一般原理和生态相关性上,而生理状态(如营养)对集体行为的影响方式仍被忽视。在此,我们研究了三种不同营养状态(对照处理:禁食 24 小时;禁食处理:禁食 7 天;消化处理:饱食后 1 小时)下普通鲦鱼(Phoxinus phoxinus)的趋群行为:消化处理:饱食后 1 小时)。营养状态和环境对游泳速度均无影响,但消化处理组的加速度大于对照组,禁食处理组的加速度介于两者之间。与滩涂群体长度和群体宽度的变化趋势相似,禁食组的个体间距离和近邻距离也大于消化组,这表明禁食和消化可能对群体凝聚力产生相反的驱动力。然而,营养状态和环境都不会影响群体面积、群体速度、群体移动时间百分比或群体极化。与消化组相比,禁食组和对照组鱼群的觅食效率和消耗食物的百分比都更高。我们的研究表明,饥饿一周和能量消耗大的食物消化阶段往往会对群体形状产生相反的影响,而社会觅食环境不会影响鱼类的个体和群体行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Processes
Behavioural Processes 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Processes is dedicated to the publication of high-quality original research on animal behaviour from any theoretical perspective. It welcomes contributions that consider animal behaviour from behavioural analytic, cognitive, ethological, ecological and evolutionary points of view. This list is not intended to be exhaustive, and papers that integrate theory and methodology across disciplines are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Behavioural response of female Lewis rats toward 31-kHz ultrasonic calls Sex-based differences, diurnal and seasonal trends in thermoregulatory behaviour of nesting Painted Stork (Mycteria leucocephala) Amphipods (Gammarus pseudolimnaeus) do not demonstrate a left-right preference in a 3-D printed aquatic T-maze Editorial Board Comparative analysis of tracking and behavioral patterns between wild-type and genetically modified fruit flies using computer vision and statistical methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1