Marcel Braun, S Dietz-Terjung, U Sommer, C Schoebel, C Heiser
{"title":"Stated patient preferences for overnight at-home diagnostic assessment of sleep disorders.","authors":"Marcel Braun, S Dietz-Terjung, U Sommer, C Schoebel, C Heiser","doi":"10.1007/s11325-024-03080-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The diagnostic workup for assessment of sleep disorders commonly involves overnight testing to assess sleep patterns and pathological events. So far, little is known about preferences for provision of home sleep tests to patients with sleep disorders. This study aims to close this gap by eliciting preferences for home sleep testing using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A DCE with seven attributes of at-home sleep testing and three levels per attribute was developed using a fractional factorial design. Patients with and without previous sleep testing experience were recruited from two large sleep centers in Germany. Coefficients for attribute levels were calculated using a conditional logit model to estimate their influence on choice decisions and calculate the relative importance of each attribute.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>305 patients (54.5 ± 13,1 years, 65.3% male) were enrolled, and 288 surveys with complete data included for analysis. Attributes with greatest relevance were Waiting time to discuss sleep study results; Waiting time to conduct sleep study, and Sleep quality during measurement. Of lowest importance was Diagnostic accuracy of sleep study, followed by Effort to apply sleep study device. Significant heterogeneity in choice behavior was found, including differences by gender, willingness-to-pay for sleep studies, and previous experience with sleep studies. Preferred location for conducting sleep testing was at-home in 50.7% and in-lab in 46.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preferences and relative importance of home sleep test attributes vary among different subgroups. Considering those preferences can be important for clinicians and policymakers when designing care pathways and planning of testing policies for sleep disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":" ","pages":"1939-1949"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03080-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The diagnostic workup for assessment of sleep disorders commonly involves overnight testing to assess sleep patterns and pathological events. So far, little is known about preferences for provision of home sleep tests to patients with sleep disorders. This study aims to close this gap by eliciting preferences for home sleep testing using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).
Methods: A DCE with seven attributes of at-home sleep testing and three levels per attribute was developed using a fractional factorial design. Patients with and without previous sleep testing experience were recruited from two large sleep centers in Germany. Coefficients for attribute levels were calculated using a conditional logit model to estimate their influence on choice decisions and calculate the relative importance of each attribute.
Results: 305 patients (54.5 ± 13,1 years, 65.3% male) were enrolled, and 288 surveys with complete data included for analysis. Attributes with greatest relevance were Waiting time to discuss sleep study results; Waiting time to conduct sleep study, and Sleep quality during measurement. Of lowest importance was Diagnostic accuracy of sleep study, followed by Effort to apply sleep study device. Significant heterogeneity in choice behavior was found, including differences by gender, willingness-to-pay for sleep studies, and previous experience with sleep studies. Preferred location for conducting sleep testing was at-home in 50.7% and in-lab in 46.9%.
Conclusions: Preferences and relative importance of home sleep test attributes vary among different subgroups. Considering those preferences can be important for clinicians and policymakers when designing care pathways and planning of testing policies for sleep disorders.
期刊介绍：
The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep.
Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
