Mind the gap: National brands’ sensitivity to price and line-length differentials at hard discounters versus conventional retailers

IF 8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jretai.2024.05.005
Joep van der Plas , Marnik G. Dekimpe , Inge Geyskens
{"title":"Mind the gap: National brands’ sensitivity to price and line-length differentials at hard discounters versus conventional retailers","authors":"Joep van der Plas ,&nbsp;Marnik G. Dekimpe ,&nbsp;Inge Geyskens","doi":"10.1016/j.jretai.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hard discounters are increasingly selling national brands that previously were only sold through conventional retailers. While this trend is gaining traction across various product categories and countries, the marketing literature has provided scant empirical evidence on the market-response effects of these brands at hard discounters, while conceptual perspectives remain conflicting.</p><p>Using an empirics-first approach, the authors address this gap by offering a rich set of First Insights into the price and line-length elasticities of national brands at hard discounters, compared to conventional retailers. They analyze data from over 1,200 national-brand listings across eight European hard discounters and 84 product categories in six countries. They examine two primary differentials: the national brands’ price and line length relative to private labels within the same format (within-store gaps) and compared to their own offering in the other format (between-store gaps).</p><p>Similar to conventional retailers, price adjustments at hard discounters have a much more pronounced impact on national-brand sales than changes in line length. However, other findings at hard discounters diverge markedly from those commonly observed at conventional retailers. At hard discounters, consumers exhibit similar responsiveness to changes in both within-store and between-store gaps, unlike in conventional retail settings where within-store reference points are typically more influential than their between-store counterparts. While national brands’ responsiveness to within-store gaps is roughly the same at hard discounters and conventional retailers, their responsiveness to between-store gaps is more than twice as pronounced at hard discounters. While these findings are consistent across four product classes, they show less stability across the six countries, highlighting the need for future research to explore country-specific boundary conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002243592400023X/pdfft?md5=98bb991453bc57573d29cd7f6e81c6eb&pid=1-s2.0-S002243592400023X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002243592400023X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hard discounters are increasingly selling national brands that previously were only sold through conventional retailers. While this trend is gaining traction across various product categories and countries, the marketing literature has provided scant empirical evidence on the market-response effects of these brands at hard discounters, while conceptual perspectives remain conflicting.

Using an empirics-first approach, the authors address this gap by offering a rich set of First Insights into the price and line-length elasticities of national brands at hard discounters, compared to conventional retailers. They analyze data from over 1,200 national-brand listings across eight European hard discounters and 84 product categories in six countries. They examine two primary differentials: the national brands’ price and line length relative to private labels within the same format (within-store gaps) and compared to their own offering in the other format (between-store gaps).

Similar to conventional retailers, price adjustments at hard discounters have a much more pronounced impact on national-brand sales than changes in line length. However, other findings at hard discounters diverge markedly from those commonly observed at conventional retailers. At hard discounters, consumers exhibit similar responsiveness to changes in both within-store and between-store gaps, unlike in conventional retail settings where within-store reference points are typically more influential than their between-store counterparts. While national brands’ responsiveness to within-store gaps is roughly the same at hard discounters and conventional retailers, their responsiveness to between-store gaps is more than twice as pronounced at hard discounters. While these findings are consistent across four product classes, they show less stability across the six countries, highlighting the need for future research to explore country-specific boundary conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注意差距:全国性品牌对折扣店与传统零售商的价格和产品种类差异的敏感度
硬折扣店越来越多地销售以前只能通过传统零售商销售的国内品牌。虽然这一趋势在不同产品类别和国家越来越受到重视,但营销文献中关于这些品牌在硬折扣店的市场反应效应的实证证据却很少,而概念上的观点仍然相互冲突。作者采用实证为先的方法,针对这一空白,提供了一套丰富的 "第一洞察",研究了与传统零售商相比,硬折扣店中全国性品牌的价格和产品线长度弹性。他们分析了来自欧洲 8 家折扣店和 6 个国家 84 个产品类别的 1,200 多个国家品牌的数据。与传统零售商类似,硬折扣店的价格调整对民族品牌销售的影响要比产品线长度的变化明显得多。然而,硬折扣店的其他发现与传统零售商的常见发现明显不同。在折扣店,消费者对店内和店间差距变化的反应相似,这与传统零售环境不同,在传统零售环境中,店内参考点通常比店间参考点更有影响力。在折扣店和传统零售商那里,全国性品牌对店内差距的反应大致相同,而在折扣店,它们对店间差距的反应则是传统零售商的两倍多。虽然这些发现在四个产品类别中是一致的,但在六个国家中的稳定性较差,这突出表明未来的研究需要探索特定国家的边界条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The focus of The Journal of Retailing is to advance knowledge and its practical application in the field of retailing. This includes various aspects such as retail management, evolution, and current theories. The journal covers both products and services in retail, supply chains and distribution channels that serve retailers, relationships between retailers and supply chain members, and direct marketing as well as emerging electronic markets for households. Articles published in the journal may take an economic or behavioral approach, but all are based on rigorous analysis and a deep understanding of relevant theories and existing literature. Empirical research follows the scientific method, employing modern sampling procedures and statistical analysis.
期刊最新文献
Bargaining with algorithms: How consumers respond to offers proposed by algorithms versus humans Quiet sellers: When introversion drives salesperson performance Understanding shoppers’ attention to price information at the point of consideration using in-store ambulatory eye-tracking FM ii: Copyright/ ID Statement Navigating the complexities of retail mergers in a changing landscape: A call for deeper insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1