Top 10 research priorities for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Australia: James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.

Roberto Chiletti, Courtney Vodopic, Emiko Hunt, Jess Lawer, Monique Bertinetti, Stephanie Malarbi, Valerie Kyritsis, Scott Petersen, David Stewart, Jean Hellstern, Michael Stewart, Leah Hickey, David G Tingay, Trisha M Prentice
{"title":"Top 10 research priorities for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Australia: James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.","authors":"Roberto Chiletti, Courtney Vodopic, Emiko Hunt, Jess Lawer, Monique Bertinetti, Stephanie Malarbi, Valerie Kyritsis, Scott Petersen, David Stewart, Jean Hellstern, Michael Stewart, Leah Hickey, David G Tingay, Trisha M Prentice","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Gaps in the Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH) Journey Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) was developed in collaboration with CDH Australia, James Lind Alliance (JLA) and the Murdoch Children's Research Institute to identify research priorities for people with CDH, their families and healthcare workers in Australasia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Research PSP in accordance with the JLA standardised methodology.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Australian community and institutions caring for patients with CDH and their families.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>CDH survivors, families of children born with CDH (including bereaved) and healthcare professionals including critical care physicians and nurses (neonatal and paediatric), obstetric, surgical, allied health professionals (physiotherapists, speech pathologists and speech therapists) and general practitioners.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Top 10 research priorities for CDH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>377 questions, from a community-based online survey, were categorised and collated into 50 research questions. Through a further prioritisation process, 21 questions were then discussed at a prioritisation workshop where they were ranked by 21 participants (CDH survivors, parents of children born with CDH (bereaved and not) and 11 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals) into their top 10 research priorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stakeholders' involvement identified the top 10 CDH-related research questions, spanning from antenatal care to long-term functional outcomes, that should be prioritised for future research to maximise meaningful outcomes for people with CDH and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Gaps in the Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH) Journey Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) was developed in collaboration with CDH Australia, James Lind Alliance (JLA) and the Murdoch Children's Research Institute to identify research priorities for people with CDH, their families and healthcare workers in Australasia.

Design: Research PSP in accordance with the JLA standardised methodology.

Setting: Australian community and institutions caring for patients with CDH and their families.

Patients: CDH survivors, families of children born with CDH (including bereaved) and healthcare professionals including critical care physicians and nurses (neonatal and paediatric), obstetric, surgical, allied health professionals (physiotherapists, speech pathologists and speech therapists) and general practitioners.

Main outcome measure: Top 10 research priorities for CDH.

Results: 377 questions, from a community-based online survey, were categorised and collated into 50 research questions. Through a further prioritisation process, 21 questions were then discussed at a prioritisation workshop where they were ranked by 21 participants (CDH survivors, parents of children born with CDH (bereaved and not) and 11 multidisciplinary healthcare professionals) into their top 10 research priorities.

Conclusion: Stakeholders' involvement identified the top 10 CDH-related research questions, spanning from antenatal care to long-term functional outcomes, that should be prioritised for future research to maximise meaningful outcomes for people with CDH and their families.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚先天性膈疝十大研究重点:James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.
目标:先天性膈疝(CDH)之旅中的空白点优先事项设定伙伴关系(PSP)是与澳大利亚 CDH 协会、詹姆斯-林德联盟(JLA)和默多克儿童研究所合作开发的,旨在为澳大拉西亚的 CDH 患者、其家人和医护人员确定研究优先事项:设计:根据 JLA 标准化方法开展 PSP 研究:环境:澳大利亚社区和护理 CDH 患者及其家属的机构:患者:CDH幸存者、CDH患儿家属(包括遗属)和医护人员,包括重症监护医生和护士(新生儿和儿科)、产科、外科、专职医护人员(物理治疗师、言语病理学家和言语治疗师)以及全科医生:对社区在线调查中的 377 个问题进行了分类,并整理成 50 个研究问题。通过进一步的优先排序过程,21 个参与者(CDH 幸存者、CDH 患儿的父母(丧子者和非丧子者)以及 11 名多学科医护人员)在优先排序研讨会上讨论了 21 个问题,并将其排序为 10 大研究重点:利益相关者的参与确定了与 CDH 相关的 10 大研究问题,从产前护理到长期功能性结果,这些问题都应列为未来研究的优先事项,以便为 CDH 患者及其家庭带来最大的有意义的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
期刊最新文献
Delivery room dextrose gel for preterm hypoglycaemia (the GEHPPI study): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Effect of an oral stimulation protocol on breastfeeding among preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial. Lingual swelling in a boy aged 4 days due to a foregut duplication cyst. Macronutrient concentrations in human milk beyond the first half year of lactation: a cohort study. Response to: 'Randomised crossover study on pulse oximeter readings from different sensors in very preterm infants' by Sharma et al.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1