Impact of a tubeless, disposable insulin pump on emergency department visits and inpatient admissions among a Medicare population.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2024.23292
Joseph E Biskupiak, Daniel L Carlow, Medha N Munshi
{"title":"Impact of a tubeless, disposable insulin pump on emergency department visits and inpatient admissions among a Medicare population.","authors":"Joseph E Biskupiak, Daniel L Carlow, Medha N Munshi","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2024.23292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A tubeless, disposable insulin pump (Omnipod DASH Insulin Management System, Insulet Corporation) has demonstrated improved glycemic outcomes for people with diabetes who require insulin. The impact of the system on downstream health care events has not been studied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess health care resource utilization for a Medicare population before and after starting tubeless, disposable insulin pump therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational analysis used data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 100% Research Identifiable Files. Study outcomes included change in event rates for diabetes-related emergency department (DRED) visits, all-cause emergency department (ACED) visits, diabetes-related inpatient (DRIP) admissions, and all-cause inpatient (ACIP) admissions among Medicare beneficiaries who started the tubeless, disposable insulin pump in 2020 (postpump observation period) as compared with the same duration and calendar period in 2019 (prepump observation period) with no pump use. Subgroup analyses were performed based on Medicare entitlement reason, diabetes type, and diagnosis status for depressive disorder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 811 users met the criteria for analysis: 46.2% had type 2 diabetes, a majority (59.2%) were aged 65 years or older, and 37.0% had a diagnosis for depressive disorder. Significant reductions were observed for DRED of -46.9% (95% CI = -63% to -23%); ACED of -29.0% (95% CI = -37% to -20%); ACIP of -19.9% (95% CI = -32% to -6%). DRIP rates declined notably (-36.6%; 95% CI = -61% to 4%). Event rates observed across subgroups demonstrated consistent downward trends; however, not all were statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate that use of the tubeless, disposable insulin pump was associated with reductions in DRED, ACED, and ACIP. Our results provide real-world evidence to support the use of the tubeless, disposable insulin pump among Medicare beneficiaries who require insulin, regardless of diabetes type or Medicare entitlement reason. Additional studies are recommended to further evaluate the effect of insulin pumps on health care utilization among the Medicare population and other insurance populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2024.23292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A tubeless, disposable insulin pump (Omnipod DASH Insulin Management System, Insulet Corporation) has demonstrated improved glycemic outcomes for people with diabetes who require insulin. The impact of the system on downstream health care events has not been studied.

Objective: To assess health care resource utilization for a Medicare population before and after starting tubeless, disposable insulin pump therapy.

Methods: This retrospective, observational analysis used data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 100% Research Identifiable Files. Study outcomes included change in event rates for diabetes-related emergency department (DRED) visits, all-cause emergency department (ACED) visits, diabetes-related inpatient (DRIP) admissions, and all-cause inpatient (ACIP) admissions among Medicare beneficiaries who started the tubeless, disposable insulin pump in 2020 (postpump observation period) as compared with the same duration and calendar period in 2019 (prepump observation period) with no pump use. Subgroup analyses were performed based on Medicare entitlement reason, diabetes type, and diagnosis status for depressive disorder.

Results: A total of 811 users met the criteria for analysis: 46.2% had type 2 diabetes, a majority (59.2%) were aged 65 years or older, and 37.0% had a diagnosis for depressive disorder. Significant reductions were observed for DRED of -46.9% (95% CI = -63% to -23%); ACED of -29.0% (95% CI = -37% to -20%); ACIP of -19.9% (95% CI = -32% to -6%). DRIP rates declined notably (-36.6%; 95% CI = -61% to 4%). Event rates observed across subgroups demonstrated consistent downward trends; however, not all were statistically significant.

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that use of the tubeless, disposable insulin pump was associated with reductions in DRED, ACED, and ACIP. Our results provide real-world evidence to support the use of the tubeless, disposable insulin pump among Medicare beneficiaries who require insulin, regardless of diabetes type or Medicare entitlement reason. Additional studies are recommended to further evaluate the effect of insulin pumps on health care utilization among the Medicare population and other insurance populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无管、一次性胰岛素泵对医疗保险人群急诊就诊和住院治疗的影响。
背景:一种无管、一次性胰岛素泵(Omnipod DASH Insulin Management System,Insulet 公司)已证明可改善需要胰岛素的糖尿病患者的血糖结果。目前尚未研究该系统对下游医疗事件的影响:评估医疗保险人群在开始使用无管、一次性胰岛素泵治疗前后的医疗资源利用情况:这项回顾性观察分析使用了美国医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心 100% 研究可识别档案中的数据。研究结果包括 2020 年(泵后观察期)开始使用无管一次性胰岛素泵的医疗保险受益人与 2019 年(泵前观察期)未使用胰岛素泵的相同时间段和日历期相比,糖尿病相关急诊(DRED)就诊率、全因急诊(ACED)就诊率、糖尿病相关住院(DRIP)入院率和全因住院(ACIP)入院率的变化情况。根据享受医疗保险的原因、糖尿病类型和抑郁症诊断情况进行了分组分析:共有 811 名用户符合分析标准:46.2% 患有 2 型糖尿病,大多数(59.2%)年龄在 65 岁或以上,37.0% 被诊断患有抑郁症。结果显示,DRED显著降低了-46.9%(95% CI = -63%至-23%);ACED显著降低了-29.0%(95% CI = -37%至-20%);ACIP显著降低了-19.9%(95% CI = -32%至-6%)。DRIP率显著下降(-36.6%;95% CI = -61%至4%)。在各分组中观察到的事件发生率呈现出一致的下降趋势;但并非所有事件发生率都具有显著的统计学意义:这些研究结果表明,使用无管、一次性胰岛素泵与减少 DRED、ACED 和 ACIP 有关。我们的研究结果提供了现实世界的证据,支持在需要胰岛素的医疗保险受益人中使用无管、一次性胰岛素泵,无论糖尿病类型或医疗保险待遇原因如何。建议开展更多研究,以进一步评估胰岛素泵对医疗保险人群和其他保险人群使用医疗服务的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
期刊最新文献
Impact of a tubeless, disposable insulin pump on emergency department visits and inpatient admissions among a Medicare population. Assessing health care resource use, outcomes, and costs among Medicaid beneficiaries receiving factor IX prophylaxis for hemophilia B. Stakeholder perspectives on the sustainability of the United States biosimilars market. Implications of treatment duration and frequency for value and cost-effective price of Alzheimer treatments. Real-world comparison of health care costs of venetoclax-obinutuzumab vs Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor use among US Medicare beneficiaries with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the frontline setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1