Strategies to address inequity of uncorrected refractive error in the Western Pacific: A modified Delphi process.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-16 DOI:10.1111/opo.13348
Ian McCormick, Kelvin Tong, Nurliyana Abdullah, Carmen Abesamis-Dischoso, Theresa Gende, Effendy Bin Hashim, S May Ho, Isabelle Jalbert, Belmerio Jeronimo, Elenoa Matoto-Raikabakaba, Koichi Ono, Prabhath Nishantha Piyasena, Jaymie T Rogers, John Szetu, Minh Anh Tran, Dennis Yan-Yin Tse, Ye Win, Tiong Peng Yap, Sangchul Yoon, Mayinuer Yusufu, Matthew J Burton, Jacqueline Ramke
{"title":"Strategies to address inequity of uncorrected refractive error in the Western Pacific: A modified Delphi process.","authors":"Ian McCormick, Kelvin Tong, Nurliyana Abdullah, Carmen Abesamis-Dischoso, Theresa Gende, Effendy Bin Hashim, S May Ho, Isabelle Jalbert, Belmerio Jeronimo, Elenoa Matoto-Raikabakaba, Koichi Ono, Prabhath Nishantha Piyasena, Jaymie T Rogers, John Szetu, Minh Anh Tran, Dennis Yan-Yin Tse, Ye Win, Tiong Peng Yap, Sangchul Yoon, Mayinuer Yusufu, Matthew J Burton, Jacqueline Ramke","doi":"10.1111/opo.13348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Uncorrected refractive error is the leading cause of vision impairment globally; however, little attention has been given to equity and access to services. This study aimed to identify and prioritise: (1) strategies to address inequity of access to refractive error services and (2) population groups to target with these strategies in five sub-regions within the Western Pacific.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We invited eye care professionals to complete a two-round online prioritisation process. In round 1, panellists nominated population groups least able to access refractive error services, and strategies to improve access. Responses were summarised and presented in round 2, where panellists ranked the groups (by extent of difficulty and size) and strategies (in terms of reach, acceptability, sustainability, feasibility and equity). Groups and strategies were scored according to their rank within each sub-region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy five people from 17 countries completed both rounds (55% women). Regional differences were evident. Indigenous peoples were a priority group for improving access in Australasia and Southeast Asia, while East Asia identified refugees and Oceania identified rural/remote people. Across the five sub-regions, reducing out-of-pocket costs was a commonly prioritised strategy for refraction and spectacles. Australasia prioritised improving cultural safety, East Asia prioritised strengthening school eye health programmes and Oceania and Southeast Asia prioritised outreach to rural areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results provide policy-makers, researchers and funders with a starting point for context-specific actions to improve access to refractive error services, particularly among underserved population groups who may be left behind in existing private sector-dominated models of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19522,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13348","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Uncorrected refractive error is the leading cause of vision impairment globally; however, little attention has been given to equity and access to services. This study aimed to identify and prioritise: (1) strategies to address inequity of access to refractive error services and (2) population groups to target with these strategies in five sub-regions within the Western Pacific.

Methods: We invited eye care professionals to complete a two-round online prioritisation process. In round 1, panellists nominated population groups least able to access refractive error services, and strategies to improve access. Responses were summarised and presented in round 2, where panellists ranked the groups (by extent of difficulty and size) and strategies (in terms of reach, acceptability, sustainability, feasibility and equity). Groups and strategies were scored according to their rank within each sub-region.

Results: Seventy five people from 17 countries completed both rounds (55% women). Regional differences were evident. Indigenous peoples were a priority group for improving access in Australasia and Southeast Asia, while East Asia identified refugees and Oceania identified rural/remote people. Across the five sub-regions, reducing out-of-pocket costs was a commonly prioritised strategy for refraction and spectacles. Australasia prioritised improving cultural safety, East Asia prioritised strengthening school eye health programmes and Oceania and Southeast Asia prioritised outreach to rural areas.

Conclusion: These results provide policy-makers, researchers and funders with a starting point for context-specific actions to improve access to refractive error services, particularly among underserved population groups who may be left behind in existing private sector-dominated models of care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决西太平洋地区未矫正屈光不正不公平问题的策略:改良德尔菲程序。
目的:未矫正的屈光不正是全球视力受损的主要原因;然而,人们很少关注服务的公平性和可及性。本研究旨在确定并优先考虑:(1) 解决屈光不正服务不公平问题的策略;(2) 在西太平洋地区的五个次区域内实施这些策略的目标人群:方法:我们邀请眼科专业人士完成两轮在线优先排序程序。在第一轮中,小组成员提名了最难获得屈光不正服务的人群,并提出了改善屈光不正服务的策略。在第二轮中,小组成员将对答复进行汇总和展示,并对群体(按困难程度和规模)和策略(按覆盖范围、可接受性、可持续性、可行性和公平性)进行排名。小组和战略根据其在各次区域内的排名进行评分:来自 17 个国家的 75 人完成了两轮调查(55% 为女性)。地区差异明显。原住民是澳大拉西亚和东南亚地区改善信息获取的优先群体,而东亚地区确定了难民,大洋洲确定了农村/偏远地区的居民。在五个次区域中,降低自付费用是屈光和眼镜方面的一项普遍优先战略。澳大拉西亚优先考虑改善文化安全,东亚优先考虑加强学校眼健康计划,大洋洲和东南亚优先考虑深入农村地区:这些结果为政策制定者、研究人员和资助者提供了一个出发点,以根据具体情况采取行动,改善屈光不正服务的可及性,特别是那些在现有的以私营部门为主的医疗模式中可能被遗忘的、服务不足的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, first published in 1925, is a leading international interdisciplinary journal that addresses basic and applied questions pertinent to contemporary research in vision science and optometry. OPO publishes original research papers, technical notes, reviews and letters and will interest researchers, educators and clinicians concerned with the development, use and restoration of vision.
期刊最新文献
Refractive development II: Modelling normal and myopic eye growth. What intrinsic factors affect the central corneal thickness? The effect of lens and fitting characteristics upon scleral lens centration. Recommended improvements to the statistical guidelines. Exploring the relationship between 24-2 visual field and widefield optical coherence tomography data across healthy, glaucoma suspect and glaucoma eyes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1