Enhancing thromboprophylaxis after colorectal cancer surgery in China: Bridging the gap between evidence and implementation through pathway optimization.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1002/phar.2945
Zhi-Chun Gu, Meng-Fei Dai, Qi Wei, Yi-Dan Yan, Jian-Yong Zheng, Gui-Ying Wang, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Chang-Qing Jing, Yong-Xiang Li, Dong-Bing Zhou, Mou-Bin Lin, Xian-Li He, Fan Li, Qian Liu, Shi-Liang Tu, Zhen-Jun Wang, Ang Li, Hou-Wen Lin, Hong-Wei Yao, Zhong-Tao Zhang
{"title":"Enhancing thromboprophylaxis after colorectal cancer surgery in China: Bridging the gap between evidence and implementation through pathway optimization.","authors":"Zhi-Chun Gu, Meng-Fei Dai, Qi Wei, Yi-Dan Yan, Jian-Yong Zheng, Gui-Ying Wang, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Chang-Qing Jing, Yong-Xiang Li, Dong-Bing Zhou, Mou-Bin Lin, Xian-Li He, Fan Li, Qian Liu, Shi-Liang Tu, Zhen-Jun Wang, Ang Li, Hou-Wen Lin, Hong-Wei Yao, Zhong-Tao Zhang","doi":"10.1002/phar.2945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The CRC-VTE trial conducted in China revealed a significant occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients following colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery, raising concerns about implementing thromboprophylaxis measures. The present study aimed to identify and analyze inappropriate aspects of current thromboprophylaxis practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study performed an analysis of the CRC-VTE trial, a prospective multicenter study that enrolled 1836 patients who underwent CRC surgery. The primary objective was to identify independent risk factors for VTE after CRC surgery using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, among the cases in which VTE occurred, the appropriateness of thromboprophylaxis was assessed based on several factors, including pharmacologic prophylaxis, time to initiate prophylaxis, drug selection, drug dosage, and duration of pharmacologic prophylaxis. Based on the analysis of the current state of thromboprophylaxis and relevant clinical guidelines, a modified Delphi method was used to develop a clinical pathway for VTE prophylaxis after CRC surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this analysis of 1836 patients, 205 (11.2%) were diagnosed with VTE during follow-up. The multifactorial analysis identified several independent risk factors for VTE, including age (≥70 years), female sex, varicose veins in the lower extremities, intraoperative blood transfusion, and the duration of immobilization exceeding 24 h. None of the patients diagnosed with VTE in the CRC trial received adequate thromboprophylaxis. The main reasons for this inappropriate practice were the omission of thromboprophylaxis, delayed initiation, and insufficient duration of thromboprophylaxis. We developed a specialized clinical pathway for thromboprophylaxis after CRC surgery to address these issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study offers a comprehensive nationwide evaluation of existing thromboprophylaxis practices in patients after CRC surgery in China. A specialized clinical pathway was developed to address the identified gaps and improve the quality of care. This clinical pathway incorporates explicit, tailored, detailed recommendations for thromboprophylaxis after CRC surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.2945","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The CRC-VTE trial conducted in China revealed a significant occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients following colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery, raising concerns about implementing thromboprophylaxis measures. The present study aimed to identify and analyze inappropriate aspects of current thromboprophylaxis practices.

Methods: This study performed an analysis of the CRC-VTE trial, a prospective multicenter study that enrolled 1836 patients who underwent CRC surgery. The primary objective was to identify independent risk factors for VTE after CRC surgery using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, among the cases in which VTE occurred, the appropriateness of thromboprophylaxis was assessed based on several factors, including pharmacologic prophylaxis, time to initiate prophylaxis, drug selection, drug dosage, and duration of pharmacologic prophylaxis. Based on the analysis of the current state of thromboprophylaxis and relevant clinical guidelines, a modified Delphi method was used to develop a clinical pathway for VTE prophylaxis after CRC surgery.

Results: In this analysis of 1836 patients, 205 (11.2%) were diagnosed with VTE during follow-up. The multifactorial analysis identified several independent risk factors for VTE, including age (≥70 years), female sex, varicose veins in the lower extremities, intraoperative blood transfusion, and the duration of immobilization exceeding 24 h. None of the patients diagnosed with VTE in the CRC trial received adequate thromboprophylaxis. The main reasons for this inappropriate practice were the omission of thromboprophylaxis, delayed initiation, and insufficient duration of thromboprophylaxis. We developed a specialized clinical pathway for thromboprophylaxis after CRC surgery to address these issues.

Conclusions: This study offers a comprehensive nationwide evaluation of existing thromboprophylaxis practices in patients after CRC surgery in China. A specialized clinical pathway was developed to address the identified gaps and improve the quality of care. This clinical pathway incorporates explicit, tailored, detailed recommendations for thromboprophylaxis after CRC surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在中国加强结直肠癌术后血栓预防:通过优化路径缩小证据与实施之间的差距。
背景:在中国进行的 CRC-VTE 试验显示,结直肠癌(CRC)术后患者静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的发生率很高,这引起了人们对实施血栓预防措施的关注。本研究旨在发现和分析当前血栓预防措施中的不当之处:本研究对 CRC-VTE 试验进行了分析,该试验是一项前瞻性多中心研究,共招募了 1836 名接受 CRC 手术的患者。主要目的是利用多变量逻辑回归分析确定 CRC 术后 VTE 的独立风险因素。此外,在发生 VTE 的病例中,根据药物预防、开始预防的时间、药物选择、药物剂量和药物预防的持续时间等因素评估了血栓预防的适当性。在分析血栓预防现状和相关临床指南的基础上,采用改良德尔菲法制定了 CRC 术后 VTE 预防的临床路径:在对1836名患者的分析中,有205人(11.2%)在随访期间被诊断为VTE。多因素分析确定了VTE的几个独立风险因素,包括年龄(≥70岁)、女性、下肢静脉曲张、术中输血以及固定时间超过24小时。造成这种不当做法的主要原因是遗漏了血栓预防措施、延迟启动血栓预防措施以及血栓预防措施持续时间不足。针对这些问题,我们制定了专门的 CRC 术后血栓预防临床路径:本研究对中国现有的 CRC 术后患者血栓预防措施进行了全面评估。针对发现的不足,制定了专门的临床路径,以提高护理质量。该临床路径为 CRC 术后血栓预防提供了明确、量身定制的详细建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Delirium event and associated treatment modifications among older adults with Alzheimer's disease: An interrupted time‐series analysis of Medicare data Influence of intravenous iron on bacterial infection risk immediately following kidney transplantation. Real-world effectiveness of monoclonal antibody inhibitors of PCSK9 in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: A retrospective cohort study. Trends in the appropriateness of oral antibiotic prescriptions dispensed in the United States from 2010 to 2018. Incretin hormone agonists: Current and emerging pharmacotherapy for obesity management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1