Minimizing tearing during vaginal delivery with a perineal protection device: a randomized controlled trial

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101402
{"title":"Minimizing tearing during vaginal delivery with a perineal protection device: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><p>There is a growing body of evidence indicating that second-degree tears cause both short- and long-term consequences. Very few preventative measures have been found to reduce the incidence of these tears.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate whether the use of a perineal protection device during vaginal birth reduces severe perineal tearing (grade ≥2 tear) in primiparous women compared with routine manual perineal support.</p></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN</h3><p>A single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted in Sweden from 2019 to 2021. Primiparous women at term were randomly allocated to the intervention group (n=43), where a perineal protection device was used, or to the routine care group (n=49). The primary outcome was grade of perineal tear. The secondary outcomes were vaginal and labial tearing. Continuous data were analyzed using the Student <em>t</em> test or Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test. Dichotomous data were analyzed using the Pearson <em>X<sup>2</sup></em> test, Fisher exact test, and ordinal logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Women in the intervention group had a significantly lower risk of sustaining more extensive perineal tearing than those in the control group. The use of the perineal protection device decreased the risk of grade ≥2 tears in relation to grade 0 to 1 tears (odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.17–0.94). Ordinal logistic regression analyses revealed an odds ratio of 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.16–0.81) per incremetn of grade injury using the perineal protection device vs routine care (<em>P</em>=.013). The number needed to treat using the perineal protection device was 4.3 to avoid 1 grade ≥2 tear. Women in the treatment group showed less labial tearing (<em>P</em>=.016). No adverse effect was detected.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>The use of a perineal protection device reduced the risk of grade ≥2 perineal tearing by 60% and labial tearing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933324001289/pdfft?md5=593e99cc73e4cf1439e28e6e46f1a9a5&pid=1-s2.0-S2589933324001289-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933324001289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a growing body of evidence indicating that second-degree tears cause both short- and long-term consequences. Very few preventative measures have been found to reduce the incidence of these tears.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether the use of a perineal protection device during vaginal birth reduces severe perineal tearing (grade ≥2 tear) in primiparous women compared with routine manual perineal support.

STUDY DESIGN

A single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted in Sweden from 2019 to 2021. Primiparous women at term were randomly allocated to the intervention group (n=43), where a perineal protection device was used, or to the routine care group (n=49). The primary outcome was grade of perineal tear. The secondary outcomes were vaginal and labial tearing. Continuous data were analyzed using the Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Dichotomous data were analyzed using the Pearson X2 test, Fisher exact test, and ordinal logistic regression.

RESULTS

Women in the intervention group had a significantly lower risk of sustaining more extensive perineal tearing than those in the control group. The use of the perineal protection device decreased the risk of grade ≥2 tears in relation to grade 0 to 1 tears (odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.17–0.94). Ordinal logistic regression analyses revealed an odds ratio of 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.16–0.81) per incremetn of grade injury using the perineal protection device vs routine care (P=.013). The number needed to treat using the perineal protection device was 4.3 to avoid 1 grade ≥2 tear. Women in the treatment group showed less labial tearing (P=.016). No adverse effect was detected.

CONCLUSION

The use of a perineal protection device reduced the risk of grade ≥2 perineal tearing by 60% and labial tearing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用会阴保护装置减少阴道分娩时的撕裂 - 随机对照试验。
背景:越来越多的证据表明,二度撕裂会造成短期和长期的后果。但很少有预防措施能降低这种撕裂的发生率:研究设计:研究设计:2019-2021年在瑞典进行了一项单中心随机对照试验。初产妇被随机分配到使用会阴保护装置的干预组(43人)或接受常规护理的干预组(49人)。主要结果是会阴撕裂等级。次要结果是阴道和阴唇撕裂。连续数据采用学生 T 检验或 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行分析。二分法数据采用皮尔逊 X2 检验、费雪精确检验和序数逻辑回归进行分析:结果:与对照组相比,干预组妇女发生更大面积会阴撕裂的风险明显降低。与 0-1 级撕裂相比,使用会阴保护装置可降低≥2 级撕裂的风险(OR 0.40 [95% CI 0.17-0.94])。顺序逻辑回归分析显示,使用会阴保护装置与对照组相比,一级损伤的增加率为 0.36 (0.16-0.81)(P=0.013)。使用会阴保护装置避免一次≥2 级撕裂所需的治疗次数为 4.3。治疗组妇女的阴唇撕裂较少(P=0.016)。未发现任何不良反应:使用会阴保护装置将会阴撕裂≥2级的风险降低了60%,同时也降低了阴唇撕裂的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
期刊最新文献
Activity restriction and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes Oxytocin regimen used for induction of labor and pregnancy outcomes. Results of the RE-DINO multicenter randomized trial on the repeated use of vaginal dinoprostone (Propess®) for labor induction in patients at term. Corrigendum to ‘Prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancies’ American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM/ Volume 4 (2022) 100551 Validation of the PROMIS© Medication Adherence Scale for Pregnant Patients Taking Aspirin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1