[Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Wedge Resection of Pulmonary 
in Patients with Small Volume Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma].

Shijun Cui, Gaoxiang Wang, Zhining Huang, Mingsheng Wu, Hanran Wu, Hangcheng Zhou, Meiqing Xu, Mingran Xie
{"title":"[Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Wedge Resection of Pulmonary \u2029in Patients with Small Volume Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma].","authors":"Shijun Cui, Gaoxiang Wang, Zhining Huang, Mingsheng Wu, Hanran Wu, Hangcheng Zhou, Meiqing Xu, Mingran Xie","doi":"10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.102.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With further understanding and research into non-small cell lung cancer with tumours ≤2 cm in maximum diameter, segmental lung resection is able to achieve the same long-term prognosis as lobectomy. However, there are few studies on the prognostic effect of wedge resection on small volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma with an invasion depth of 0.5 to 1.0 cm. Therefore, this study focuses on the clinical efficacy and prognosis of wedge resection in patients with small-volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of the medical records of 208 patients who underwent surgery in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Affiliated Provincial Hospital of Anhui Medical University from February 2016 to December 2017 was made, and the postoperative pathological results confirmed small volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma. According to their surgical methods, they were divided into lobectomy group (n=115), segmentectomy group (n=48) and wedge resection group (n=45). Kaplan-Meier survival curve estimation and Cox proportional risk regression model were used to explore the influence of different surgical methods on the prognosis of patients with small volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The wedge resection group had better perioperative outcomes compared with the segmentectomy group and lobectomy group, with statistically significant differences in intraoperative bleeding (P=0.036), postoperative drainage (P<0.001), operative time (P=0.018), postoperative time with tubes (P=0.001), and postoperative complication rate (P=0.006). There were no significant differences when comparing the three groups in terms of survival rate (lobectomy group vs segmentectomy group, P=0.303; lobectomy group vs wedge resection group, P=0.742; and segmentectomy group vs wedge resection group, P=0.278) and recurrence-free survival rate (lobectomy group vs segmentectomy group, P=0.495; lobectomy group vs wedge resection group, P=0.362; segmentectomy group vs wedge resection group, P=0.775). Univariate and multivariate survival analyses showed that consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) was the prognostic factor of overall survival and revurrence-free survival for patients with small-volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Wedge resection in patients with small volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma can achieve long-term outcomes similar to segmentectomy and lobectomy. When the CTR≤0.5, wedge resection is preferred in such patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":39317,"journal":{"name":"中国肺癌杂志","volume":"27 5","pages":"359-366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11183310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国肺癌杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.102.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With further understanding and research into non-small cell lung cancer with tumours ≤2 cm in maximum diameter, segmental lung resection is able to achieve the same long-term prognosis as lobectomy. However, there are few studies on the prognostic effect of wedge resection on small volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma with an invasion depth of 0.5 to 1.0 cm. Therefore, this study focuses on the clinical efficacy and prognosis of wedge resection in patients with small-volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of the medical records of 208 patients who underwent surgery in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Affiliated Provincial Hospital of Anhui Medical University from February 2016 to December 2017 was made, and the postoperative pathological results confirmed small volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma. According to their surgical methods, they were divided into lobectomy group (n=115), segmentectomy group (n=48) and wedge resection group (n=45). Kaplan-Meier survival curve estimation and Cox proportional risk regression model were used to explore the influence of different surgical methods on the prognosis of patients with small volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma.

Results: The wedge resection group had better perioperative outcomes compared with the segmentectomy group and lobectomy group, with statistically significant differences in intraoperative bleeding (P=0.036), postoperative drainage (P<0.001), operative time (P=0.018), postoperative time with tubes (P=0.001), and postoperative complication rate (P=0.006). There were no significant differences when comparing the three groups in terms of survival rate (lobectomy group vs segmentectomy group, P=0.303; lobectomy group vs wedge resection group, P=0.742; and segmentectomy group vs wedge resection group, P=0.278) and recurrence-free survival rate (lobectomy group vs segmentectomy group, P=0.495; lobectomy group vs wedge resection group, P=0.362; segmentectomy group vs wedge resection group, P=0.775). Univariate and multivariate survival analyses showed that consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) was the prognostic factor of overall survival and revurrence-free survival for patients with small-volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Wedge resection in patients with small volume invasive lung adenocarcinoma can achieve long-term outcomes similar to segmentectomy and lobectomy. When the CTR≤0.5, wedge resection is preferred in such patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[小体积浸润性肺腺癌患者肺楔形切除术的临床疗效分析]。
背景:随着对肿瘤最大直径≤2厘米的非小细胞肺癌的进一步了解和研究,肺段切除术能够获得与肺叶切除术相同的长期预后。然而,关于楔形切除术对浸润深度为 0.5 至 1.0 厘米的小体积浸润性肺腺癌的预后影响的研究很少。因此,本研究重点关注楔形切除术对小体积浸润性肺腺癌患者的临床疗效和预后:回顾性分析2016年2月至2017年12月在安徽医科大学附属省立医院胸外科接受手术治疗的208例患者病历,术后病理结果证实为小体积浸润性肺腺癌。根据手术方式分为肺叶切除组(n=115)、肺段切除组(n=48)和楔形切除组(n=45)。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线估计和Cox比例风险回归模型探讨不同手术方法对小体积浸润性肺腺癌患者预后的影响:楔形切除术组与分段切除术组和肺叶切除术组相比围手术期预后更好,术中出血量(P=0.036)、术后引流量(PConclusions:小体积浸润性肺腺癌患者的楔形切除术可获得与分段切除术和肺叶切除术相似的长期疗效。当CTR≤0.5时,此类患者首选楔形切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国肺癌杂志
中国肺癌杂志 Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5131
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer(CJLC, pISSN 1009-3419, eISSN 1999-6187), a monthly Open Access journal, is hosted by Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. CJLC was indexed in DOAJ, EMBASE/SCOPUS, Chemical Abstract(CA), CSA-Biological Science, HINARI, EBSCO-CINAHL,CABI Abstract, Global Health, CNKI, etc. Editor-in-Chief: Professor Qinghua ZHOU.
期刊最新文献
[A Case Report of EGFR-TKIs Resistant Secondary MET Gene Amplified 
Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Literature Review]. [Advances of Neoadjuvant Targeted Therapy in ALK-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]. [Application of Nano-drug Delivery Technology in Overcoming Drug Resistance 
in Lung Cancer]. [Clinicopathological Analysis of 14 Cases of Primary Pulmonary Lymphoepithelial Carcinoma]. [Immunotherapy for Extensive-stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: 
Research Progress and Future Perspectives].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1