Yutong Chen, Cyprien A Rivier, Samantha A Mora, Victor Torres Lopez, Sam Payabvash, Kevin N Sheth, Andreas Harloff, Guido J Falcone, Jonathan Rosand, Ernst Mayerhofer, Christopher D Anderson
{"title":"Deep learning survival model predicts outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage from initial CT scan.","authors":"Yutong Chen, Cyprien A Rivier, Samantha A Mora, Victor Torres Lopez, Sam Payabvash, Kevin N Sheth, Andreas Harloff, Guido J Falcone, Jonathan Rosand, Ernst Mayerhofer, Christopher D Anderson","doi":"10.1177/23969873241260154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting functional impairment after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) provides valuable information for planning of patient care and rehabilitation strategies. Current prognostic tools are limited in making long term predictions and require multiple expert-defined inputs and interpretation that make their clinical implementation challenging. This study aimed to predict long term functional impairment of ICH patients from admission non-contrast CT scans, leveraging deep learning models in a survival analysis framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the admission non-contrast CT scans from 882 patients from the Massachusetts General Hospital ICH Study for training, hyperparameter optimization, and model selection, and 146 patients from the Yale New Haven ICH Study for external validation of a deep learning model predicting functional outcome. Disability (modified Rankin scale [mRS] > 2), severe disability (mRS > 4), and dependent living status were assessed via telephone interviews after 6, 12, and 24 months. The prediction methods were evaluated by the c-index and compared with ICH score and FUNC score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using non-contrast CT, our deep learning model achieved higher prediction accuracy of post-ICH dependent living, disability, and severe disability by 6, 12, and 24 months (c-index 0.742 [95% CI -0.700 to 0.778], 0.712 [95% CI -0.674 to 0.752], 0.779 [95% CI -0.733 to 0.832] respectively) compared with the ICH score (c-index 0.673 [95% CI -0.662 to 0.688], 0.647 [95% CI -0.637 to 0.661] and 0.697 [95% CI -0.675 to 0.717]) and FUNC score (c-index 0.701 [95% CI- 0.698 to 0.723], 0.668 [95% CI -0.657 to 0.680] and 0.727 [95% CI -0.708 to 0.753]). In the external independent Yale-ICH cohort, similar performance metrics were obtained for disability and severe disability (c-index 0.725 [95% CI -0.673 to 0.781] and 0.747 [95% CI -0.676 to 0.807], respectively). Similar AUC of predicting each outcome at 6 months, 1 and 2 years after ICH was achieved compared with ICH score and FUNC score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed a generalizable deep learning model to predict onset of dependent living and disability after ICH, which could help to guide treatment decisions, advise relatives in the acute setting, optimize rehabilitation strategies, and anticipate long-term care needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Stroke Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873241260154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Predicting functional impairment after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) provides valuable information for planning of patient care and rehabilitation strategies. Current prognostic tools are limited in making long term predictions and require multiple expert-defined inputs and interpretation that make their clinical implementation challenging. This study aimed to predict long term functional impairment of ICH patients from admission non-contrast CT scans, leveraging deep learning models in a survival analysis framework.
Methods: We used the admission non-contrast CT scans from 882 patients from the Massachusetts General Hospital ICH Study for training, hyperparameter optimization, and model selection, and 146 patients from the Yale New Haven ICH Study for external validation of a deep learning model predicting functional outcome. Disability (modified Rankin scale [mRS] > 2), severe disability (mRS > 4), and dependent living status were assessed via telephone interviews after 6, 12, and 24 months. The prediction methods were evaluated by the c-index and compared with ICH score and FUNC score.
Results: Using non-contrast CT, our deep learning model achieved higher prediction accuracy of post-ICH dependent living, disability, and severe disability by 6, 12, and 24 months (c-index 0.742 [95% CI -0.700 to 0.778], 0.712 [95% CI -0.674 to 0.752], 0.779 [95% CI -0.733 to 0.832] respectively) compared with the ICH score (c-index 0.673 [95% CI -0.662 to 0.688], 0.647 [95% CI -0.637 to 0.661] and 0.697 [95% CI -0.675 to 0.717]) and FUNC score (c-index 0.701 [95% CI- 0.698 to 0.723], 0.668 [95% CI -0.657 to 0.680] and 0.727 [95% CI -0.708 to 0.753]). In the external independent Yale-ICH cohort, similar performance metrics were obtained for disability and severe disability (c-index 0.725 [95% CI -0.673 to 0.781] and 0.747 [95% CI -0.676 to 0.807], respectively). Similar AUC of predicting each outcome at 6 months, 1 and 2 years after ICH was achieved compared with ICH score and FUNC score.
Conclusion: We developed a generalizable deep learning model to predict onset of dependent living and disability after ICH, which could help to guide treatment decisions, advise relatives in the acute setting, optimize rehabilitation strategies, and anticipate long-term care needs.
背景:预测脑出血(ICH)后的功能障碍可为规划患者护理和康复策略提供有价值的信息。目前的预后工具在进行长期预测方面存在局限性,而且需要多个专家定义的输入和解释,这使其在临床上的应用具有挑战性。本研究旨在利用生存分析框架中的深度学习模型,通过入院非对比 CT 扫描预测 ICH 患者的长期功能障碍:我们使用麻省总医院 ICH 研究中 882 名患者的入院非对比 CT 扫描结果进行训练、超参数优化和模型选择,并使用耶鲁纽黑文 ICH 研究中 146 名患者的扫描结果对预测功能结果的深度学习模型进行外部验证。在 6 个月、12 个月和 24 个月后,通过电话访谈对残疾(改良朗肯量表 [mRS] > 2)、严重残疾(mRS > 4)和依赖性生活状况进行评估。预测方法通过 c 指数进行评估,并与 ICH 评分和 FUNC 评分进行比较:使用非对比 CT,我们的深度学习模型在 6、12 和 24 个月后对 ICH 后依赖性生活、残疾和严重残疾的预测准确率更高(c 指数分别为 0.742 [95% CI -0.700 to 0.778]、0.712 [95% CI -0.674 to 0.752]、0.779 [95% CI -0.733 to 0.832])。832])相比(c-指数分别为 0.673 [95% CI -0.662 to 0.688]、0.647 [95% CI -0.637 to 0.661] 和 0.697 [95% CI -0.675至0.717])和FUNC评分(c指数为0.701[95% CI- 0.698至0.723]、0.668[95% CI -0.657 至0.680]和0.727[95% CI -0.708 至0.753])。在外部独立的 Yale-ICH 队列中,残疾和严重残疾的性能指标相似(c 指数分别为 0.725 [95% CI -0.673 至 0.781] 和 0.747 [95% CI -0.676 至 0.807])。与ICH评分和FUNC评分相比,预测ICH后6个月、1年和2年的各项结果的AUC相似:我们开发了一种可推广的深度学习模型来预测 ICH 后依赖性生活和残疾的发生,这有助于指导治疗决策、在急性期为亲属提供建议、优化康复策略以及预测长期护理需求。
期刊介绍:
Launched in 2016 the European Stroke Journal (ESJ) is the official journal of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), a professional non-profit organization with over 1,400 individual members, and affiliations to numerous related national and international societies. ESJ covers clinical stroke research from all fields, including clinical trials, epidemiology, primary and secondary prevention, diagnosis, acute and post-acute management, guidelines, translation of experimental findings into clinical practice, rehabilitation, organisation of stroke care, and societal impact. It is open to authors from all relevant medical and health professions. Article types include review articles, original research, protocols, guidelines, editorials and letters to the Editor. Through ESJ, authors and researchers have gained a new platform for the rapid and professional publication of peer reviewed scientific material of the highest standards; publication in ESJ is highly competitive. The journal and its editorial team has developed excellent cooperation with sister organisations such as the World Stroke Organisation and the International Journal of Stroke, and the American Heart Organization/American Stroke Association and the journal Stroke. ESJ is fully peer-reviewed and is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Issues are published 4 times a year (March, June, September and December) and articles are published OnlineFirst prior to issue publication.