Temporal trends in medical device implant procedures in Australia 2008-22: evidence from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Hospital Morbidity database.

Mohammad Afshar Ali, Thu-Lan Kelly, Marianne Gillam
{"title":"Temporal trends in medical device implant procedures in Australia 2008-22: evidence from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Hospital Morbidity database.","authors":"Mohammad Afshar Ali, Thu-Lan Kelly, Marianne Gillam","doi":"10.1071/AH23126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveExamine the temporal trends in medical device implant procedures in the Australian population.MethodsWe used data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare from the financial years 2007-08 to 2021-22 and chose the most frequently performed medical device implant procedures. We estimated the annual change in volume of procedures and age-standardised rates by calculating the compound annual growth rate (CAGR), and used regression with the Newey-West robust variance estimator to examine whether there was a linear trend in the age-standardised rates for each procedure.ResultsFor procedures including cardiac pacemakers, heart valves, hip and knee arthroplasties, and intraocular lenses, the crude CAGR was over 3%. For the age-standardised rates, the CAGR was largest for cardiac pacemaker, followed by heart valve replacement and hip arthroplasty procedures. For some procedures, the growth was more than in the Australian population, including cardiac pacemakers (β=1.00; 95% CI: 0.14-1.86), heart valve replacements (β=0.41; 95% CI: 0.28-0.54), hip arthroplasty (β=3.50; 95% CI: 1.61-5.38), and knee arthroplasty (β=4.31; 95% CI: 0.54-8.09) procedures. The trend of standardised rates of procedures, including incisional hernia with mesh, breast implants, coronary stents, and cardiac defibrillators, grew at the same rate as the population, whereas the rate for gastric banding procedures decreased (β=-3.14; 95% CI: -4.92 to -1.34).ConclusionThe findings from the current study, showing a large increase in medical device implant procedures, will assist in future healthcare planning and efforts in post-market surveillance of safety of medical devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH23126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveExamine the temporal trends in medical device implant procedures in the Australian population.MethodsWe used data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare from the financial years 2007-08 to 2021-22 and chose the most frequently performed medical device implant procedures. We estimated the annual change in volume of procedures and age-standardised rates by calculating the compound annual growth rate (CAGR), and used regression with the Newey-West robust variance estimator to examine whether there was a linear trend in the age-standardised rates for each procedure.ResultsFor procedures including cardiac pacemakers, heart valves, hip and knee arthroplasties, and intraocular lenses, the crude CAGR was over 3%. For the age-standardised rates, the CAGR was largest for cardiac pacemaker, followed by heart valve replacement and hip arthroplasty procedures. For some procedures, the growth was more than in the Australian population, including cardiac pacemakers (β=1.00; 95% CI: 0.14-1.86), heart valve replacements (β=0.41; 95% CI: 0.28-0.54), hip arthroplasty (β=3.50; 95% CI: 1.61-5.38), and knee arthroplasty (β=4.31; 95% CI: 0.54-8.09) procedures. The trend of standardised rates of procedures, including incisional hernia with mesh, breast implants, coronary stents, and cardiac defibrillators, grew at the same rate as the population, whereas the rate for gastric banding procedures decreased (β=-3.14; 95% CI: -4.92 to -1.34).ConclusionThe findings from the current study, showing a large increase in medical device implant procedures, will assist in future healthcare planning and efforts in post-market surveillance of safety of medical devices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2008-22 年澳大利亚医疗器械植入手术的时间趋势:来自澳大利亚卫生与福利研究所全国医院发病率数据库的证据。
方法我们使用了澳大利亚卫生与福利研究所提供的 2007-08 财年至 2021-22 财年的数据,并选择了最常进行的医疗器械植入手术。通过计算复合年增长率 (CAGR),我们估算了手术量和年龄标准化率的年度变化,并使用纽威-韦斯特稳健方差估计器进行回归,以检验每种手术的年龄标准化率是否存在线性趋势。结果对于包括心脏起搏器、心脏瓣膜、髋关节和膝关节置换术以及眼内透镜在内的手术,粗略的复合年增长率超过 3%。就年龄标准化比率而言,心脏起搏器的年复合增长率最大,其次是心脏瓣膜置换术和髋关节置换术。某些手术的增长率高于澳大利亚人口,包括心脏起搏器(β=1.00;95% CI:0.14-1.86)、心脏瓣膜置换术(β=0.41;95% CI:0.28-0.54)、髋关节置换术(β=3.50;95% CI:1.61-5.38)和膝关节置换术(β=4.31;95% CI:0.54-8.09)。包括带网片的切口疝、乳房植入物、冠状动脉支架和心脏除颤器在内的标准化手术率趋势与人口增长率相同,而胃束带手术率则有所下降(β=-3.14;95% CI:-4.92 至-1.34)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the outcomes of Australia's first all-age public hospital Sport and Exercise Medicine Outpatient Clinic: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Trajectories of hospital service use in the last 12months of life by people with chronic kidney disease: a retrospective cohort study. Can I record this? A scoping review of Australian hospital policies governing consultation recording. Patients' reasons for leaving an emergency department without being seen: results from a survey-based cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic. What's in a name? Why the proposed title change for podiatric surgeons is a step backward.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1