Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in premature exits from permanent supportive housing among residents with substance use disorders.

Talia J Panadero, Sonya Gabrielian, Marissa J Seamans, Lillian Gelberg, Jack Tsai, Taylor Harris
{"title":"Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in premature exits from permanent supportive housing among residents with substance use disorders.","authors":"Talia J Panadero, Sonya Gabrielian, Marissa J Seamans, Lillian Gelberg, Jack Tsai, Taylor Harris","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4442590/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Permanent supportive housing (PSH) is an evidence-based practice for reducing homelessness that subsidizes permanent, independent housing and provides case management-including linkages to health services. Substance use disorders (SUDs) are common contributing factors towards premature, unwanted (\"negative\") PSH exits; little is known about racial/ethnic differences in negative PSH exits among residents with SUDs. Within the nation's largest PSH program at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), we examined relationships among SUDs and negative PSH exits (for up to five years post-PSH move-in) across racial/ethnic subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used VA administrative data to identify a cohort of homeless-experienced Veterans (HEVs) (n = 2,712) who were housed through VA Greater Los Angeles' PSH program from 2016-2019. We analyzed negative PSH exits by HEVs with and without SUDs across racial/ethnic subgroups (i.e., African American/Black, Non-Hispanic White, Hispanic/Latino, and Other/Mixed [Asian, American Indian or Alaskan Native, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and multi-race]) in controlled models and accounting for competing risk of death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In competing risk models, HEVs with at least one SUD had 1.3 times the hazard of negative PSH exits compared to those without SUDs (95% CI: 1.00, 1.61). When stratifying by race/ethnicity, Other/Mixed race residents with at least one SUD had 6.4 times the hazard of negative PSH exits compared to their peers without SUDs (95% CI: 1.61-25.50). Hispanic/Latino residents with at least one SUD had 1.9 times the hazard compared to those without SUDs, also indicating a strong relationship with negative PSH exits; however, this association was not statistically significant (95% CI: 0.85-4.37). Black residents with at least one SUD had 1.2 times the hazard compared to those without SUDs (95% CI: 0.85-1.64), indicating no evidence of an association with negative PSH exits. Similarly, Non-Hispanic White residents with at least one SUD had 1.1 times the hazard compared to those without SUDs (95% CI: 0.75-1.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest relationships between SUDs and negative PSH exits differ between race/ethnic groups and suggest there may be value in culturally specific tailoring and implementation of SUD services for these subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":94282,"journal":{"name":"Research square","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research square","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4442590/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Permanent supportive housing (PSH) is an evidence-based practice for reducing homelessness that subsidizes permanent, independent housing and provides case management-including linkages to health services. Substance use disorders (SUDs) are common contributing factors towards premature, unwanted ("negative") PSH exits; little is known about racial/ethnic differences in negative PSH exits among residents with SUDs. Within the nation's largest PSH program at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), we examined relationships among SUDs and negative PSH exits (for up to five years post-PSH move-in) across racial/ethnic subgroups.

Methods: We used VA administrative data to identify a cohort of homeless-experienced Veterans (HEVs) (n = 2,712) who were housed through VA Greater Los Angeles' PSH program from 2016-2019. We analyzed negative PSH exits by HEVs with and without SUDs across racial/ethnic subgroups (i.e., African American/Black, Non-Hispanic White, Hispanic/Latino, and Other/Mixed [Asian, American Indian or Alaskan Native, and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and multi-race]) in controlled models and accounting for competing risk of death.

Results: In competing risk models, HEVs with at least one SUD had 1.3 times the hazard of negative PSH exits compared to those without SUDs (95% CI: 1.00, 1.61). When stratifying by race/ethnicity, Other/Mixed race residents with at least one SUD had 6.4 times the hazard of negative PSH exits compared to their peers without SUDs (95% CI: 1.61-25.50). Hispanic/Latino residents with at least one SUD had 1.9 times the hazard compared to those without SUDs, also indicating a strong relationship with negative PSH exits; however, this association was not statistically significant (95% CI: 0.85-4.37). Black residents with at least one SUD had 1.2 times the hazard compared to those without SUDs (95% CI: 0.85-1.64), indicating no evidence of an association with negative PSH exits. Similarly, Non-Hispanic White residents with at least one SUD had 1.1 times the hazard compared to those without SUDs (95% CI: 0.75-1.66).

Conclusions: These findings suggest relationships between SUDs and negative PSH exits differ between race/ethnic groups and suggest there may be value in culturally specific tailoring and implementation of SUD services for these subgroups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决有药物使用障碍的居民过早退出永久性支持性住房的种族和民族差异问题。
背景:永久性支持性住房(Permanent supportive housing,PSH)是一种减少无家可归现象的循证做法,它为永久性独立住房提供补贴,并提供个案管理--包括与医疗服务的联系。药物使用障碍(SUDs)是导致过早、不希望("消极")退出永久支持性住房的常见因素;但人们对患有药物使用障碍的居民在消极退出永久支持性住房方面的种族/民族差异知之甚少。在退伍军人事务部(VA)这个全美最大的 PSH 项目中,我们研究了不同种族/民族亚群的 SUD 与 PSH 负面退出(PSH 入住后五年内)之间的关系:我们利用退伍军人事务部的行政数据,确定了一批有无家可归经历的退伍军人(HEVs)(n = 2,712),他们在 2016-2019 年期间通过退伍军人事务部大洛杉矶地区的 PSH 项目入住。我们在对照模型中分析了不同种族/族裔亚群(即非裔美国人/黑人、非西班牙裔白人、西班牙裔/拉丁美洲人和其他/混血人[亚裔、美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民、夏威夷原住民或其他太平洋岛民以及多种族])中有和没有 SUD 的 HEV 的 PSH 负退出情况,并考虑了死亡竞争风险:在竞争风险模型中,至少有一项 SUD 的 HEV 与没有 SUD 的 HEV 相比,其 PSH 负退出风险是后者的 1.3 倍(95% CI:1.00, 1.61)。如果按照种族/人种进行分层,至少有一个 SUD 的其他/混血居民与没有 SUD 的居民相比,其 PSH 负退出风险是后者的 6.4 倍(95% CI:1.61-25.50)。至少患有一种药物滥用症的西班牙裔/拉美裔居民与没有药物滥用症的居民相比,其危险性是后者的 1.9 倍,这也表明其与消极的 PSH 退出有密切关系;然而,这种关联在统计上并不显著(95% CI:0.85-4.37)。至少患有一种药物滥用症的黑人居民与没有药物滥用症的黑人居民相比,其危险性是后者的 1.2 倍(95% CI:0.85-1.64),这表明没有证据表明两者之间存在关联。同样,至少患有一种 SUD 的非西班牙裔白人居民的风险是没有 SUD 的居民的 1.1 倍(95% CI:0.75-1.66):这些研究结果表明,不同种族/族裔群体之间的 SUD 与 PSH 负退出之间的关系存在差异,并表明针对这些亚群体的特定文化定制和实施 SUD 服务可能具有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Long non-coding RNA Malat1 fine-tunes bone homeostasis and repair by orchestrating cellular crosstalk and the β-catenin-OPG/Jagged1 pathway. Dietary lipid is largely deposited in skin and rapidly affects insulating properties. Novel Machine Learning of DNA Methylation Patterns to Diagnose Complex Disease: Identification of Cerebral Palsy with Concurrent Epilepsy. The context-dependent epigenetic and organogenesis programs determine 3D vs. 2D cellular fitness of MYC-driven murine liver cancer cells. GZMK+CD8+ T cells Target A Specific Acinar Cell Type in Sjögren's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1