Safety and efficacy of Kaffes intraductal self-expanding metal stents in the management of post-liver transplant anastomotic strictures

Chee Lim, Jonathan Ng, Babak Sarraf, R. Vaughan, M. Efthymiou, L. Zorron Cheng Tao Pu, S. Chandran
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of Kaffes intraductal self-expanding metal stents in the management of post-liver transplant anastomotic strictures","authors":"Chee Lim, Jonathan Ng, Babak Sarraf, R. Vaughan, M. Efthymiou, L. Zorron Cheng Tao Pu, S. Chandran","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.91081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Endoscopic management is the first-line therapy for post-liver-transplant anastomotic strictures. Although the optimal duration of treatment with plastic stents has been reported to be 8-12 months, data on safety and duration for metal stents in this setting is scarce. Due to limited access to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in our centre, there was a change in practice towards increased usage and length-of-stay of the Kaffes biliary intraductal self-expanding stent in patients with suitable anatomy. This was mainly due to the theoretical benefit of Kaffes stents allowing for longer indwelling periods compared to the traditional plastic stents.\n AIM\n To compare the safety and efficacy profile of different stenting durations using Kaffes stents.\n METHODS\n Adult liver transplant recipients aged 18 years and above who underwent ERCP were retrospectively identified during a 10-year period through a database query. Unplanned admissions post-Kaffes stent insertion were identified manually through electronic and scanned medical records. The main outcome was the incidence of complications when stents were left indwelling for 3 months vs 6 months. Stent efficacy was calculated via rates of stricture recurrence between patients that had stenting courses for ≤ 120 d or > 120 d.\n RESULTS\n During the study period, a total of 66 ERCPs with Kaffes insertion were performed in 54 patients throughout their stenting course. In 33 ERCPs, the stent was removed or exchanged on a 3-month interval. No pancreatitis, perforations or deaths occurred. Minor post-ERCP complications were similar between the 3-month (abdominal pain and intraductal migration) and 6-month (abdominal pain, septic shower and embedded stent) groups - 6.1% vs 9.1% respectively, P = 0.40. All strictures resolved at the end of the stenting course, but the stenting course was variable from 3 to 22 months. The recurrence rate for stenting courses lasting for up to 120 d was 71.4% and 21.4% for stenting courses of 121 d or over (P = 0.03). There were 28 patients that were treated with a single ERCP with Kaffes, 21 with removal after 120 d and 7 within 120 d. There was a significant improvement in stricture recurrence when the Kaffes was removed after 120 d when a single ERCP was used for the entire stenting course (71.0% vs 10.0%, P = 0.01).\n CONCLUSION\n Utilising a single Kaffes intraductal fully-covered metal stent for at least 4 months is safe and efficacious for the management of post-transplant anastomotic strictures.","PeriodicalId":506536,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Transplantation","volume":"23 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i2.91081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Endoscopic management is the first-line therapy for post-liver-transplant anastomotic strictures. Although the optimal duration of treatment with plastic stents has been reported to be 8-12 months, data on safety and duration for metal stents in this setting is scarce. Due to limited access to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in our centre, there was a change in practice towards increased usage and length-of-stay of the Kaffes biliary intraductal self-expanding stent in patients with suitable anatomy. This was mainly due to the theoretical benefit of Kaffes stents allowing for longer indwelling periods compared to the traditional plastic stents. AIM To compare the safety and efficacy profile of different stenting durations using Kaffes stents. METHODS Adult liver transplant recipients aged 18 years and above who underwent ERCP were retrospectively identified during a 10-year period through a database query. Unplanned admissions post-Kaffes stent insertion were identified manually through electronic and scanned medical records. The main outcome was the incidence of complications when stents were left indwelling for 3 months vs 6 months. Stent efficacy was calculated via rates of stricture recurrence between patients that had stenting courses for ≤ 120 d or > 120 d. RESULTS During the study period, a total of 66 ERCPs with Kaffes insertion were performed in 54 patients throughout their stenting course. In 33 ERCPs, the stent was removed or exchanged on a 3-month interval. No pancreatitis, perforations or deaths occurred. Minor post-ERCP complications were similar between the 3-month (abdominal pain and intraductal migration) and 6-month (abdominal pain, septic shower and embedded stent) groups - 6.1% vs 9.1% respectively, P = 0.40. All strictures resolved at the end of the stenting course, but the stenting course was variable from 3 to 22 months. The recurrence rate for stenting courses lasting for up to 120 d was 71.4% and 21.4% for stenting courses of 121 d or over (P = 0.03). There were 28 patients that were treated with a single ERCP with Kaffes, 21 with removal after 120 d and 7 within 120 d. There was a significant improvement in stricture recurrence when the Kaffes was removed after 120 d when a single ERCP was used for the entire stenting course (71.0% vs 10.0%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION Utilising a single Kaffes intraductal fully-covered metal stent for at least 4 months is safe and efficacious for the management of post-transplant anastomotic strictures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kaffes 导管内自膨胀金属支架治疗肝移植后吻合口狭窄的安全性和有效性
背景内镜治疗是肝移植后吻合口狭窄的一线疗法。尽管有报道称塑料支架的最佳治疗时间为 8-12 个月,但有关金属支架在这种情况下的安全性和治疗时间的数据却很少。在 2019 年冠状病毒病大流行期间,由于内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的使用受到限制,我们中心的做法发生了变化,在解剖结构合适的患者中增加了 Kaffes 胆管内自膨胀支架的使用,并延长了支架的使用时间。这主要是因为与传统的塑料支架相比,Kaffes 支架理论上可以延长留置时间。目的 比较使用 Kaffes 支架的不同支架植入时间的安全性和有效性。方法 通过数据库查询,对 10 年内接受 ERCP 的 18 岁及以上成人肝移植受者进行回顾性研究。通过电子病历和扫描病历人工确认了卡夫斯支架植入后的意外入院情况。主要结果是支架留置3个月与6个月的并发症发生率。支架疗效通过支架植入疗程≤120 d或>120 d的患者的狭窄复发率来计算。 结果 在研究期间,共有54名患者在整个支架植入疗程中进行了66次带有Kaffes支架的ERCP。在 33 例 ERCP 中,支架在间隔 3 个月后被取出或更换。没有发生胰腺炎、穿孔或死亡。ERCP术后3个月组(腹痛和导管内移位)和6个月组(腹痛、脓淋和支架嵌入)的轻微并发症相似,分别为6.1%和9.1%,P = 0.40。所有狭窄均在支架植入疗程结束时缓解,但支架植入疗程从 3 个月到 22 个月不等。支架植入疗程在120天以内的复发率为71.4%,121天或以上的复发率为21.4%(P = 0.03)。如果在整个支架植入疗程中使用单次ERCP,在120 d后取出Kaffes,则狭窄复发率显著改善(71.0% vs 10.0%,P = 0.01)。结论 使用单个 Kaffes 导管内全覆盖金属支架至少 4 个月是治疗移植后吻合口狭窄的安全有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Critical considerations for the management of acute abdomen in transplant patients Frequency of and reasons behind non-listing in adult patients referred for liver transplantation: Results from a retrospective study Impact of payment source, referral site, and place of residence on outcomes after allogeneic transplantation in Mexico Incidence, risk factors and clinical outcome of multidrug-resistant organisms after heart transplantation Whole-eye transplantation: Current challenges and future perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1