To study the communication hindrance between laboratory technicians and dentist of work authorization for FPD- A survey

Nikita Narendra Valvi, S. Khalikar, K. Mahale, Vilas L Rajguru, Sonali Mahajan, Ulhas E Tandale
{"title":"To study the communication hindrance between laboratory technicians and dentist of work authorization for FPD- A survey","authors":"Nikita Narendra Valvi, S. Khalikar, K. Mahale, Vilas L Rajguru, Sonali Mahajan, Ulhas E Tandale","doi":"10.18231/j.ijohd.2024.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim of this survey was to determine the communication the level of communication between dentists and dental laboratories in specific areas of the work authorization forms for the fabrication of fixed partial dentures. A questionnaire was prepared to assess communication gap between dentist and lab technicians through work authorization for FDPs. A total of 70 dental laboratory technicians were provided with a questionnaire regarding work authorization form via Google doc files. The survey focused questions pertaining to fulfilling the following areas of work authorization: patient’s information, name of the prescribing dentist, material for the prosthesis, pontic design of the prosthesis, shade description, and date of completion of work. The number of responses received was statistically evaluated using Fisher’s t‑test and nonparametric Spearman’s correlation coefficient (P ≤ 0.05). Eighty out of 100 laboratory technicians surveyed responded to the questionnaire.The patient’s general information was satisfactorily filled in 75%–100% of the forms. Information regarding the pontic design, staining diagram, and preferred margin were on the lower side of the scale ranging between 25% and 50%. The survey concluded that areas of work authorization with respect to fixed dental prosthesis require attention and need to be adequately filled by the dentist. In addition, the study suggests that the foundation of communication skill training programs in work authorization should be laid from the undergraduate curriculum. The concerned authorized bodies/specialty organizations should formulate a standardized work authorization format which can bridge the wide gap between the crown and bridge office and laboratory.","PeriodicalId":516738,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Oral Health Dentistry","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Oral Health Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijohd.2024.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim of this survey was to determine the communication the level of communication between dentists and dental laboratories in specific areas of the work authorization forms for the fabrication of fixed partial dentures. A questionnaire was prepared to assess communication gap between dentist and lab technicians through work authorization for FDPs. A total of 70 dental laboratory technicians were provided with a questionnaire regarding work authorization form via Google doc files. The survey focused questions pertaining to fulfilling the following areas of work authorization: patient’s information, name of the prescribing dentist, material for the prosthesis, pontic design of the prosthesis, shade description, and date of completion of work. The number of responses received was statistically evaluated using Fisher’s t‑test and nonparametric Spearman’s correlation coefficient (P ≤ 0.05). Eighty out of 100 laboratory technicians surveyed responded to the questionnaire.The patient’s general information was satisfactorily filled in 75%–100% of the forms. Information regarding the pontic design, staining diagram, and preferred margin were on the lower side of the scale ranging between 25% and 50%. The survey concluded that areas of work authorization with respect to fixed dental prosthesis require attention and need to be adequately filled by the dentist. In addition, the study suggests that the foundation of communication skill training programs in work authorization should be laid from the undergraduate curriculum. The concerned authorized bodies/specialty organizations should formulate a standardized work authorization format which can bridge the wide gap between the crown and bridge office and laboratory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究实验室技术人员与牙医之间在 FPD 工作授权方面的沟通障碍--一项调查
这项调查的目的是确定牙医和牙科技工室之间在固定局部义齿制作工作授权表特定领域的沟通程度。为评估牙医和技工之间在固定局部义齿制作工作授权方面的沟通差距,我们准备了一份调查问卷。我们通过谷歌文档文件向 70 名牙科技工提供了有关工作授权表的调查问卷。调查的主要问题涉及工作授权的以下几个方面:患者信息、开处方的牙医姓名、修复体材料、修复体的基台设计、色调描述和工作完成日期。收到的回复数量采用费雪 t 检验和非参数斯皮尔曼相关系数(P ≤ 0.05)进行统计评估。在接受调查的 100 名技工中,有 80 名技工对问卷做出了答复。在 75%-100% 的表格中,患者的一般信息填写令人满意。有关牙冠设计、染色图和首选边缘的信息则偏低,在 25% 到 50% 之间。调查得出的结论是,固定义齿修复方面的工作授权领域需要关注,并需要牙医充分填写。此外,研究还建议,工作授权方面的沟通技巧培训课程应从本科课程开始奠定基础。相关授权机构/专科组织应制定标准化的工作授权格式,以弥合牙冠和牙桥修复室与技工室之间的巨大差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unlocking dental solutions: strategies for axenfeld rieger syndrome care Awareness among undergraduates about State Dental Council and Medico - legal issues - Stratified cluster random sampling survey Comparative analysis of chlorhexidine and listerine mouthwashes on buccal cell health: A clinical and cytological investigation Unraveling the genetic basis of dental diseases: A comprehensive review Glimpsing beyond the glitter: Navigating the depths of oral piercings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1