Hydrogen production from woody biomass gasification: a techno-economic analysis

IF 3.2 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-Biofpr Pub Date : 2024-06-15 DOI:10.1002/bbb.2647
Veronica Gubin, Florian Benedikt, Ferdinand Thelen, Martin Hammerschmid, Tom Popov, Hermann Hofbauer, Stefan Müller
{"title":"Hydrogen production from woody biomass gasification: a techno-economic analysis","authors":"Veronica Gubin,&nbsp;Florian Benedikt,&nbsp;Ferdinand Thelen,&nbsp;Martin Hammerschmid,&nbsp;Tom Popov,&nbsp;Hermann Hofbauer,&nbsp;Stefan Müller","doi":"10.1002/bbb.2647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions are necessary to slow global warming and decrease the likelihood of irreversible climate scenarios. There is thus an urgent need for low-emissions fuels. This study conducted a techno-economic analysis of two different industrial plant concepts for producing hydrogen from woody biomass. One was a large-scale centralized 60 MW<sub>H2</sub> option using dual fluidized bed gasification with CO<sub>2</sub> removal. The other was a small-scale decentralized 1 MW<sub>H2</sub> option using fixed-bed gasification without CO<sub>2</sub> removal. Mass and energy balances were calculated by the process simulation software IPSEpro. Key performance indicators, including technical, economic, and environmental parameters, were derived. Overall energy efficiencies of 64.2 and 59.5% and hydrogen yields of 87 and 68 g<sub>H2</sub> kg<sup>−1</sup><sub>BM.db</sub> were determined for hydrogen production by dual fluidized bed and fixed-bed gasification, respectively. The levelized costs of hydrogen amounted to 5.6 and 15.0 €<sub>2022</sub> kg<sup>−1</sup><sub>H2</sub> and agreed quite well with values from the literature. Flexible and decentralized heat, electricity, and hydrogen production based on fixed-bed gasification within a multiproduct plant were also evaluated. The results show that the multiproduct plant could be economically feasible if at least 63% of the annual operating hours were dedicated to hydrogen production, and assuming a hydrogen selling price of 17.5 €<sub>2022</sub> kg<sup>−1</sup><sub>H2</sub> in Austria. In conclusion, both of the processes that were evaluated are conceivable technologies for the transition of the energy system towards renewable energy sources from a technical and economic point of view, although small-scale hydrogen production is considerably more expensive.</p>","PeriodicalId":55380,"journal":{"name":"Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-Biofpr","volume":"18 4","pages":"818-836"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bbb.2647","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-Biofpr","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bbb.2647","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reductions in greenhouse gas emissions are necessary to slow global warming and decrease the likelihood of irreversible climate scenarios. There is thus an urgent need for low-emissions fuels. This study conducted a techno-economic analysis of two different industrial plant concepts for producing hydrogen from woody biomass. One was a large-scale centralized 60 MWH2 option using dual fluidized bed gasification with CO2 removal. The other was a small-scale decentralized 1 MWH2 option using fixed-bed gasification without CO2 removal. Mass and energy balances were calculated by the process simulation software IPSEpro. Key performance indicators, including technical, economic, and environmental parameters, were derived. Overall energy efficiencies of 64.2 and 59.5% and hydrogen yields of 87 and 68 gH2 kg−1BM.db were determined for hydrogen production by dual fluidized bed and fixed-bed gasification, respectively. The levelized costs of hydrogen amounted to 5.6 and 15.0 €2022 kg−1H2 and agreed quite well with values from the literature. Flexible and decentralized heat, electricity, and hydrogen production based on fixed-bed gasification within a multiproduct plant were also evaluated. The results show that the multiproduct plant could be economically feasible if at least 63% of the annual operating hours were dedicated to hydrogen production, and assuming a hydrogen selling price of 17.5 €2022 kg−1H2 in Austria. In conclusion, both of the processes that were evaluated are conceivable technologies for the transition of the energy system towards renewable energy sources from a technical and economic point of view, although small-scale hydrogen production is considerably more expensive.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
木质生物质气化制氢:技术经济分析
必须减少温室气体排放,以减缓全球变暖,降低出现不可逆转的气候情景的可能性。因此,迫切需要低排放燃料。本研究对利用木质生物质制氢的两种不同工业工厂概念进行了技术经济分析。一种是大规模集中式 60 兆瓦时2 方案,采用双流化床气化技术,并去除二氧化碳。另一种是小型分散式 1 MWH2 方案,采用固定床气化技术,不去除二氧化碳。质量和能量平衡由工艺模拟软件 IPSEpro 计算得出。得出了关键性能指标,包括技术、经济和环境参数。双流化床和固定床气化制氢的综合能效分别为 64.2% 和 59.5%,氢气产量分别为 87 和 68 gH2 kg-1BM.db。氢气的平准化成本分别为 5.6 和 15.0 欧元 2022 kg-1H2,与文献中的数值相当吻合。此外,还对基于固定床气化技术的多产品工厂内灵活分散的热能、电力和氢气生产进行了评估。结果表明,假设奥地利的氢气销售价格为 17.5 欧元 2022 kg-1H2 ,如果每年至少有 63% 的运行时间用于氢气生产,则多产品工厂在经济上是可行的。总之,从技术和经济角度来看,所评估的两种工艺都是能源系统向可再生能源过渡的可行技术,尽管小规模制氢的成本要高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining is a vital source of information on sustainable products, fuels and energy. Examining the spectrum of international scientific research and industrial development along the entire supply chain, The journal publishes a balanced mixture of peer-reviewed critical reviews, commentary, business news highlights, policy updates and patent intelligence. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining is dedicated to fostering growth in the biorenewables sector and serving its growing interdisciplinary community by providing a unique, systems-based insight into technologies in these fields as well as their industrial development.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Rethinking the sustainable bioeconomy at a turning point in my life Performance and kinetic analysis of biogas production from co-digestion of landfill leachate with pineapple peel in batch experiments A sustainable approach for xylitol production from pistachio shell using Candida tropicalis Turning trash into treasure: conversion of agroresidue rice straw into carboxymethylcellulose biopolymer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1