Knowledge and Attitude of The Medical Staff Toward Poliomyelitis and Polio Vaccination Campaign: A Cross–Sectional Study in Al-Najaf Al -Ashraf City–Iraq

Hawraa Makki Kareem, Huda Ghazi Hameed
{"title":"Knowledge and Attitude of The Medical Staff Toward Poliomyelitis and Polio Vaccination Campaign: A Cross–Sectional Study in Al-Najaf Al -Ashraf City–Iraq","authors":"Hawraa Makki Kareem, Huda Ghazi Hameed","doi":"10.36330/kmj.v20i1.16212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Medical staff needs to understand factors that affect poliomyelitis vaccination because their attitudes about vaccination are highly associated with rates of childhood vaccination if medical staff do not view a specific vaccine as necessary or acceptable, vaccination campaigns can be ineffective. Aim of the study: To assess the knowledge and attitudes of the medical staff toward poliomyelitis and polio vaccination campaigns. Patients and methods: A cross-sectional study conducted from 1st of January 2019 to 29th February 2020, and included (332) medical staff from randomly selected hospitals and primary health centers. Data were collected using a questionnaire designed for the study, which consists of three parts: socio-demographic and personal information, knowledge, and attitude. for knowledge, each correct answer scored 1 while the wrong one scored 0. For attitude, each “agree” answer scored 1 while “disagree” or “I don’t know” scored 0. Statistical analyses were done using SPSS version 26 and a P- value ≤0.05 was considered Statistically significant. Results: The study included 332 medical staff: 143 (43.1%) doctors, 77 (23.2%) dentists, and 112 (33.7%) pharmacists. The mean knowledge score was higher among doctors than dentists and pharmacists (18.22, 15.38, and 15.67, respectively, p = 0.0001). As age increased, the mean knowledge score also increased (20.22 for 50-59 years old vs. 14.81 for 23-29 years old, P = 0.0001). The attitude score followed the same trend, being higher among doctors and older age groups (2.97 vs. 2.68 and 2.82, P = 0.0001) and higher for the older age group (3 vs. 2.82, P = 0.0001).  Conclusions: The mean knowledge and attitude scores of doctors are significantly higher than dentists and pharmacists and for the older age group. ","PeriodicalId":507092,"journal":{"name":"Kufa Medical Journal","volume":"79 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kufa Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36330/kmj.v20i1.16212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical staff needs to understand factors that affect poliomyelitis vaccination because their attitudes about vaccination are highly associated with rates of childhood vaccination if medical staff do not view a specific vaccine as necessary or acceptable, vaccination campaigns can be ineffective. Aim of the study: To assess the knowledge and attitudes of the medical staff toward poliomyelitis and polio vaccination campaigns. Patients and methods: A cross-sectional study conducted from 1st of January 2019 to 29th February 2020, and included (332) medical staff from randomly selected hospitals and primary health centers. Data were collected using a questionnaire designed for the study, which consists of three parts: socio-demographic and personal information, knowledge, and attitude. for knowledge, each correct answer scored 1 while the wrong one scored 0. For attitude, each “agree” answer scored 1 while “disagree” or “I don’t know” scored 0. Statistical analyses were done using SPSS version 26 and a P- value ≤0.05 was considered Statistically significant. Results: The study included 332 medical staff: 143 (43.1%) doctors, 77 (23.2%) dentists, and 112 (33.7%) pharmacists. The mean knowledge score was higher among doctors than dentists and pharmacists (18.22, 15.38, and 15.67, respectively, p = 0.0001). As age increased, the mean knowledge score also increased (20.22 for 50-59 years old vs. 14.81 for 23-29 years old, P = 0.0001). The attitude score followed the same trend, being higher among doctors and older age groups (2.97 vs. 2.68 and 2.82, P = 0.0001) and higher for the older age group (3 vs. 2.82, P = 0.0001).  Conclusions: The mean knowledge and attitude scores of doctors are significantly higher than dentists and pharmacists and for the older age group. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医务人员对脊髓灰质炎和脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种运动的认识和态度:伊拉克纳杰夫阿什拉夫市的横断面研究
背景:医务人员需要了解影响脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种的因素,因为他们对疫苗接种的态度与儿童疫苗接种率密切相关。研究目的评估医务人员对脊髓灰质炎和脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种活动的认识和态度。患者和方法:这项横断面研究于 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 2 月 29 日进行,研究对象包括随机抽取的医院和初级保健中心的(332 名)医务人员。数据收集采用为本研究设计的调查问卷,问卷由三部分组成:社会人口学和个人信息、知识和态度。对于知识,每个正确答案记 1 分,错误答案记 0 分;对于态度,每个 "同意 "答案记 1 分,"不同意 "或 "我不知道 "记 0 分。统计分析采用 SPSS 26 版,P 值≤0.05 为具有统计学意义。研究结果研究包括 332 名医务人员:其中医生 143 人(43.1%),牙医 77 人(23.2%),药剂师 112 人(33.7%)。医生的平均知识得分高于牙医和药剂师(分别为 18.22、15.38 和 15.67,P = 0.0001)。随着年龄的增长,平均知识得分也在增加(50-59 岁为 20.22 分,23-29 岁为 14.81 分,P = 0.0001)。态度得分也呈同样的趋势,医生组和年龄较大组的态度得分更高(2.97 对 2.68 和 2.82,P = 0.0001),年龄较大组的态度得分更高(3 对 2.82,P = 0.0001)。 结论医生的知识和态度平均得分明显高于牙医和药剂师,在老年组中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Correlation between Serum Levels of Progranulin and Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease The Prevalence of Hashimoto's Thyroiditis among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Shear-Wave Elastographic Evaluation of Splenic Stiffness in Patients with Chronic Liver Diseases as A Predictor of the Oesophageal Varices Grade Admission Pattern and Treatment Outcome in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in Al Zahraa Teaching Hospital, Iraq, Najaf The Effect of Age on Right Ventricular Systolic Function Using Traditional Echocardiographic Measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1