Prevalence and underlying mechanisms of phylosymbiosis in land plants

Liqun Lin, Luke R Tembrock, Ko-Hsuan Chen, Li Wang
{"title":"Prevalence and underlying mechanisms of phylosymbiosis in land plants","authors":"Liqun Lin, Luke R Tembrock, Ko-Hsuan Chen, Li Wang","doi":"10.1093/jpe/rtae051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Phylosymbiosis, the congruence of microbiome composition with host phylogeny, is a valuable framework for investigating plant-microbe associations and their evolutionary ecology. This review assesses the prevalence of phylosymbiosis across the plant kingdom, elucidates the fundamental ecological and evolutionary processes contributing to its occurrence based on previous research and explores commonly used methods for identifying phylosymbiosis. We find that the presence of phylosymbiosis may be influenced by both phylogenetic distance and the taxonomic level at which host plants are examined, with the strength of associations potentially decreasing as the taxonomic scale becomes finer. Notably, the endophytic microbiome exhibits a stronger phylosymbiosis signal compared to the epiphytic or rhizosphere-associated microbiomes. The type of microorganisms (e.g., fungi and bacteria) can yield highly variable evidence for phylosymbiosis due to differences in colonization, transmission, or functional characteristics. We also outline how the four community assembly processes (dispersal, selection, diversification, drift) contribute to the establishment and maintenance of host-microbe phylosymbiosis. Furthermore, we highlight the diversity of methods employed to detect phylosymbiosis, which involves three key processes: constructing host phylogenies, assessing microbial data, and statistically evaluating the correlation between host phylogeny and microbial composition. Remarkably different methodologies across studies make comparisons between findings challenging. To advance our understanding, future research is expected to explore phylosymbiosis at lower taxonomic levels and investigate different microbial communities coexisting synergistically within the same host. Understanding the relative importance of community assembly processes in driving phylosymbiosis will be critical for gaining deeper insights into the ecology and evolution of host-microbe interactions.","PeriodicalId":503671,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Ecology","volume":"38 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtae051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phylosymbiosis, the congruence of microbiome composition with host phylogeny, is a valuable framework for investigating plant-microbe associations and their evolutionary ecology. This review assesses the prevalence of phylosymbiosis across the plant kingdom, elucidates the fundamental ecological and evolutionary processes contributing to its occurrence based on previous research and explores commonly used methods for identifying phylosymbiosis. We find that the presence of phylosymbiosis may be influenced by both phylogenetic distance and the taxonomic level at which host plants are examined, with the strength of associations potentially decreasing as the taxonomic scale becomes finer. Notably, the endophytic microbiome exhibits a stronger phylosymbiosis signal compared to the epiphytic or rhizosphere-associated microbiomes. The type of microorganisms (e.g., fungi and bacteria) can yield highly variable evidence for phylosymbiosis due to differences in colonization, transmission, or functional characteristics. We also outline how the four community assembly processes (dispersal, selection, diversification, drift) contribute to the establishment and maintenance of host-microbe phylosymbiosis. Furthermore, we highlight the diversity of methods employed to detect phylosymbiosis, which involves three key processes: constructing host phylogenies, assessing microbial data, and statistically evaluating the correlation between host phylogeny and microbial composition. Remarkably different methodologies across studies make comparisons between findings challenging. To advance our understanding, future research is expected to explore phylosymbiosis at lower taxonomic levels and investigate different microbial communities coexisting synergistically within the same host. Understanding the relative importance of community assembly processes in driving phylosymbiosis will be critical for gaining deeper insights into the ecology and evolution of host-microbe interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
陆生植物共生现象的普遍性及其内在机制
系统共生(微生物组组成与宿主系统发育的一致性)是研究植物-微生物关联及其进化生态学的重要框架。本综述评估了系统共生在植物界的普遍性,根据以往的研究阐明了导致系统共生发生的基本生态和进化过程,并探讨了识别系统共生的常用方法。我们发现,系统共生关系的存在可能受到系统发育距离和宿主植物分类学水平的影响,随着分类学尺度变得越来越细,关联的强度可能会降低。值得注意的是,与附生或根圈相关微生物群相比,内生微生物群表现出更强的系统共生信号。微生物的类型(如真菌和细菌)会因定殖、传播或功能特征的不同而产生差异很大的系统共生证据。我们还概述了四个群落组装过程(扩散、选择、多样化、漂移)是如何促进宿主-微生物系统共生关系的建立和维持的。此外,我们还强调了检测系统共生所采用方法的多样性,其中涉及三个关键过程:构建宿主系统发育、评估微生物数据以及统计评估宿主系统发育与微生物组成之间的相关性。不同研究采用的方法明显不同,因此比较不同研究结果具有挑战性。为了加深我们的理解,未来的研究有望在较低的分类水平上探索系统共生,并调查同一宿主内协同共存的不同微生物群落。了解群落组装过程在驱动系统共生过程中的相对重要性,对于深入了解宿主-微生物相互作用的生态学和进化至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Manipulated Microtopography Alters Plant Community Development in Fragile Farm-Pastoral Transition Zone Increasing biochar diversity promotes impacts of plant diversity on remediating cadmium in the soil Effects of leguminous green manure-crop rotation on soil enzyme activities and stoichiometry Sex-specific phosphorus (P)-use and -acquisition in dioecious Populus euphratica as affected by soil moisture levels Differential phenological responses to temperature among different stages of spring vegetation green-up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1