The Silicon Valley paradox: A qualitative interview study on the social, cultural, and ideological foundations of a global innovation center

Thorsten Quandt, Johanna Klapproth
{"title":"The Silicon Valley paradox: A qualitative interview study on the social, cultural, and ideological foundations of a global innovation center","authors":"Thorsten Quandt, Johanna Klapproth","doi":"10.1515/commun-2023-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Silicon Valley is both object of intense fascination and stark criticism. Academic observers have described it as a unique amalgamation of hippie culture, libertarian thinking, wild experimentation, but also scientific rigor, high-tech precision, and turbo-capitalism – a seemingly improbable, even paradoxical combination. Nevertheless, Silicon Valley continues to be an economic powerhouse and a global innovation hub. The current study explores its socio-cultural and ideological foundations through the lens of an insider perspective to find explanations for its stability and sustained success in light of conflicting components. Based on 15 interviews with Silicon Valley experts from start-ups, tech giants, and academic institutions, the study identifies several paradoxes on the level of ideology and environment, structure(s), and actors. These can be grouped into a binary, oppositional view, indeed describing the Silicon Valley paradox. However, alternative explanations are given, including the conceptualization as a non-dualist phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":501361,"journal":{"name":"Communications","volume":"5 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2023-0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Silicon Valley is both object of intense fascination and stark criticism. Academic observers have described it as a unique amalgamation of hippie culture, libertarian thinking, wild experimentation, but also scientific rigor, high-tech precision, and turbo-capitalism – a seemingly improbable, even paradoxical combination. Nevertheless, Silicon Valley continues to be an economic powerhouse and a global innovation hub. The current study explores its socio-cultural and ideological foundations through the lens of an insider perspective to find explanations for its stability and sustained success in light of conflicting components. Based on 15 interviews with Silicon Valley experts from start-ups, tech giants, and academic institutions, the study identifies several paradoxes on the level of ideology and environment, structure(s), and actors. These can be grouped into a binary, oppositional view, indeed describing the Silicon Valley paradox. However, alternative explanations are given, including the conceptualization as a non-dualist phenomenon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硅谷悖论:关于全球创新中心的社会、文化和意识形态基础的定性访谈研究
摘 要 硅谷既是令人着迷的地方,也是尖锐批评的对象。学术观察家将其描述为一个独特的混合体,既有嬉皮士文化、自由主义思想、疯狂的实验,又有严谨的科学、高科技的精确性和涡轮资本主义--这似乎是一个不可能的,甚至是自相矛盾的组合。尽管如此,硅谷仍然是一个经济重镇和全球创新中心。本研究从内部人士的视角出发,探讨硅谷的社会文化和意识形态基础,为硅谷在各种相互冲突的因素中保持稳定和持续成功寻找解释。根据对硅谷初创企业、科技巨头和学术机构专家的 15 次访谈,本研究在意识形态和环境、结构和参与者层面发现了若干悖论。这些悖论可以归纳为一种二元对立的观点,即硅谷悖论。不过,研究也给出了其他解释,包括将其概念化为一种非二元现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Living hated: Everyday experiences of hate speech across online and offline contexts Combatting online hate: Crowd moderation and the public goods problem Anti-immigrant rhetoric of populist radical right leaders on social media platforms “An image hurts more than 1000 words?” Four eyes, two truths: Explaining heterogeneity in perceived severity of digital hate against immigrants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1