A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Adolescents’ Beliefs About the Causes of Depression

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Adolescent Research Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1177/07435584241256605
Isaac L. Ahuvia, Sharon Chen, Lucy H. Gordon, Kathryn R. Fox, J. Schleider
{"title":"A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Adolescents’ Beliefs About the Causes of Depression","authors":"Isaac L. Ahuvia, Sharon Chen, Lucy H. Gordon, Kathryn R. Fox, J. Schleider","doi":"10.1177/07435584241256605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of the present study was to better understand adolescents’ beliefs about what causes depression and how these beliefs relate to other clinical constructs. This study explored the causal beliefs about depression held by a diverse sample of U.S. adolescents with elevated depression symptoms ( N = 281; 55% White non-Hispanic; 53% cisgender girl; 78% LGBQ*). Qualitative methods were used to identify causal beliefs from open-ended survey responses. Quantitative methods compared the perceived causes of one’s own depression versus others’ depression, compared causal beliefs across groups, and measured the association between causal beliefs and additional clinical constructs. The most common causal beliefs were dysfunctional home and family relationships (52%) and stress from school (42%). Several causal beliefs were expressed more in regards to one’s own depression than others’ depression (e.g., adverse childhood events, 11% vs. 3%, p = .004) and vice versa (e.g., social media use, 12% vs. 2%, p < .001). Few significant relationships emerged between causal beliefs and demographic and clinical variables. Adolescents’ causal beliefs about depression are diverse and multifaceted, and their causal beliefs endorsed about their own depression differ substantially from those endorsed about depression generally. However, associations between adolescents’ causal beliefs and clinical variables appear limited.","PeriodicalId":47949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescent Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584241256605","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to better understand adolescents’ beliefs about what causes depression and how these beliefs relate to other clinical constructs. This study explored the causal beliefs about depression held by a diverse sample of U.S. adolescents with elevated depression symptoms ( N = 281; 55% White non-Hispanic; 53% cisgender girl; 78% LGBQ*). Qualitative methods were used to identify causal beliefs from open-ended survey responses. Quantitative methods compared the perceived causes of one’s own depression versus others’ depression, compared causal beliefs across groups, and measured the association between causal beliefs and additional clinical constructs. The most common causal beliefs were dysfunctional home and family relationships (52%) and stress from school (42%). Several causal beliefs were expressed more in regards to one’s own depression than others’ depression (e.g., adverse childhood events, 11% vs. 3%, p = .004) and vice versa (e.g., social media use, 12% vs. 2%, p < .001). Few significant relationships emerged between causal beliefs and demographic and clinical variables. Adolescents’ causal beliefs about depression are diverse and multifaceted, and their causal beliefs endorsed about their own depression differ substantially from those endorsed about depression generally. However, associations between adolescents’ causal beliefs and clinical variables appear limited.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年对抑郁原因看法的混合方法调查
本研究旨在更好地了解青少年对抑郁症成因的看法,以及这些看法与其他临床因素之间的关系。本研究探讨了美国不同样本的抑郁症状升高的青少年(N = 281;55% 非西班牙裔白人;53% 顺性别女孩;78% LGBQ*)所持有的抑郁症因果信念。研究采用定性方法,从开放式调查回答中确定因果信念。定量方法比较了自己和他人认为的抑郁原因,比较了不同群体的因果信念,并测量了因果信念与其他临床建构之间的关联。最常见的成因信念是家庭关系失调(52%)和学业压力(42%)。与他人的抑郁相比,一些因果信念更多地是针对自己的抑郁而表达的(例如,不良童年事件,11% 对 3%,p = .004),反之亦然(例如,社交媒体的使用,12% 对 2%,p < .001)。因果信念与人口统计学和临床变量之间几乎没有明显的关系。青少年对抑郁症的因果信念是多样化和多方面的,他们对自己抑郁症的因果信念与对一般抑郁症的因果信念有很大不同。然而,青少年的因果信念与临床变量之间的关联似乎很有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescent Research
Journal of Adolescent Research PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Adolescent Research is to publish lively, creative, and informative articles on development during adolescence (ages 10-18) and emerging adulthood (ages 18-25). The journal encourages papers that use qualitative, ethnographic, or other methods that present the voices of adolescents. Few strictly quantitative, questionnaire-based articles are published in the Journal of Adolescent Research, unless they break new ground in a previously understudied area. However, papers that combine qualitative and quantitative data are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
“I Wanna at Least Give Back so They Could Have an Idea of Doing Right”: A Culturally Relevant Approach to Understanding Black Adolescent Males’ Moral Development Exploring the Role of Social Media Content on Sexual Health Behaviors and Decision-Making Among Young Black Females “Imagine Growing Up Thinking the US is the Best Opportunity”: Immigrant Origin Youth of Color Supporting the Black Lives Matter Movement on Twitter Challenges and Strategies in Working with Latine Adolescents in a Math Enrichment Afterschool Activity Establishing a Reciprocal and Recursive Relationship Between Sociopolitical Development and Wellbeing for Early Emerging Adult College Students When “There Was a lot Happening in Both the World. . . and Within My Own Personal World”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1