The optimum fire window: applying the fire–productivity hypothesis to Jurassic climate states

T. P. Hollaar, C. Belcher, M. Ruhl, J. Deconinck, S. Hesselbo
{"title":"The optimum fire window: applying the fire–productivity hypothesis to Jurassic climate states","authors":"T. P. Hollaar, C. Belcher, M. Ruhl, J. Deconinck, S. Hesselbo","doi":"10.5194/bg-21-2795-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Present-day fire frequency is related to a productivity–aridity gradient on regional and global scales. Optimum fire conditions occur at times of intermediate productivity and aridity, whereas fire is limited at the high productivity (moisture) and aridity (no fuel) endmembers. However, the current global fire activity pattern is reinforced by the predominant burning of grasslands. Here we test the intermediate fire–productivity hypothesis for a period on Earth before the evolution of grasses, the Early Jurassic, and explore the fire regime of two contrasting climatic states: the cooling of the Late Pliensbachian Event (LPE) and the warming of the Sinemurian–Pliensbachian Boundary (SPB). Palaeo-fire records are reconstructed from fossil charcoal abundance, and changes in the hydrological cycle are tracked via clay mineralogy, which allows inference of changes in fuel moisture status. Large fluctuations in the fossil charcoal on an eccentricity timescale indicate two modes of fire regime at the time. Wildfires were moisture-limited in a high-productivity ecosystem during eccentricity minima for both the SPB and the LPE. During eccentricity maxima fires increased, and an optimum fire window was reached, in which periodically greater seasonality in rainfall and temperatures led to intermediate states of productivity and aridity. The LPE experienced more extreme climatic endmembers compared to the SPB, with the fire regime edging closer to “moisture limitation” during eccentricity minima, and experienced more pronounced seasonality during eccentricity maxima, explained by the overall cooler climate at the time. This study illustrates that the intermediate-productivity gradient holds up during two contrasting climatic states in the Jurassic.\n","PeriodicalId":502171,"journal":{"name":"Biogeosciences","volume":"61 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2795-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Present-day fire frequency is related to a productivity–aridity gradient on regional and global scales. Optimum fire conditions occur at times of intermediate productivity and aridity, whereas fire is limited at the high productivity (moisture) and aridity (no fuel) endmembers. However, the current global fire activity pattern is reinforced by the predominant burning of grasslands. Here we test the intermediate fire–productivity hypothesis for a period on Earth before the evolution of grasses, the Early Jurassic, and explore the fire regime of two contrasting climatic states: the cooling of the Late Pliensbachian Event (LPE) and the warming of the Sinemurian–Pliensbachian Boundary (SPB). Palaeo-fire records are reconstructed from fossil charcoal abundance, and changes in the hydrological cycle are tracked via clay mineralogy, which allows inference of changes in fuel moisture status. Large fluctuations in the fossil charcoal on an eccentricity timescale indicate two modes of fire regime at the time. Wildfires were moisture-limited in a high-productivity ecosystem during eccentricity minima for both the SPB and the LPE. During eccentricity maxima fires increased, and an optimum fire window was reached, in which periodically greater seasonality in rainfall and temperatures led to intermediate states of productivity and aridity. The LPE experienced more extreme climatic endmembers compared to the SPB, with the fire regime edging closer to “moisture limitation” during eccentricity minima, and experienced more pronounced seasonality during eccentricity maxima, explained by the overall cooler climate at the time. This study illustrates that the intermediate-productivity gradient holds up during two contrasting climatic states in the Jurassic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最佳火灾窗口:将火灾生产力假说应用于侏罗纪气候状态
摘要。目前的火灾频率与区域和全球范围内的生产力-干旱梯度有关。最佳的火灾条件出现在生产力和干旱度处于中等水平的时期,而在生产力(湿度)和干旱度(无燃料)处于高水平的时期,火灾则受到限制。然而,当前的全球火灾活动模式因主要燃烧草原而得到加强。在此,我们对地球上草类进化之前的一个时期--早侏罗世--的中间火生产力假说进行了检验,并探索了两种截然不同的气候状态下的火灾机制:晚普利恩巴赫期(LPE)的降温和新穆棱-普利恩巴赫期边界(SPB)的升温。根据化石木炭的丰度重建了古火灾记录,并通过粘土矿物学追踪了水文循环的变化,从而推断出燃料水分状态的变化。化石木炭在偏心时间尺度上的巨大波动表明当时有两种火灾模式。在SPB和LPE的偏心率最小值期间,野火在高生产力生态系统中是受水分限制的。在偏心率最大值期间,野火增加,并达到最佳火灾窗口期,在这一时期,降雨和气温的季节性周期性增强,导致生产力和干旱处于中间状态。与 SPB 相比,LPE 经历了更极端的气候特征,在偏心率最小值期间,火灾机制更接近于 "水分限制",而在偏心率最大值期间,则经历了更明显的季节性,这也是当时整体气候较冷的原因。这项研究表明,在侏罗纪两种截然不同的气候状态下,中间生产力梯度仍然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impacts of modelling prescribed vs. dynamic land cover in a high-CO2 future scenario – greening of the Arctic and Amazonian dieback Linking geomorphological processes and wildlife microhabitat selection: nesting birds select refuges generated by permafrost degradation in the Arctic The biological and preformed carbon pumps in perpetually slower and warmer oceans Climate-based prediction of carbon fluxes from deadwood in Australia Composite calcite and opal test in Foraminifera (Rhizaria)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1