Student Evaluation in the Subject of Technology in Primary Schools in Slovakia

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.15503/jecs2024.1.535.548
D. Lukáčová, Patrik Botló
{"title":"Student Evaluation in the Subject of Technology in Primary Schools in Slovakia","authors":"D. Lukáčová, Patrik Botló","doi":"10.15503/jecs2024.1.535.548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. School evaluation is a sensitive process that involves teachers, students, and their parents in various ways. This article focuses on researching student evaluation by teachers in the subject of Technology in Slovak primary schools. The research aims to determine how teachers assess students in the subject of Technology.\nMethods. As a research tool, we used a self-designed questionnaire for teachers. We analysed the respondents' answers using descriptive statistical methods. To ascertain differences in responses between qualified and unqualified teachers, we employed the chi-square test.\nResults. By analysing the data obtained from 107 questionnaires, we found that technology teachers mostly employ an individual approach when evaluating students and emphasise the practical aspects of the subject. Among the evaluation methods, grading scales for summative student assessment prevail. At the same time, there were statistically significant differences between qualified and unqualified teachers. We also observed statistically significant differences in evaluations between qualified and unqualified teachers.\nConclusion. For this reason, it is necessary to ensure an increase in the number of qualified and internally motivated technology teachers in primary schools, as only such teachers can motivate and inspire their students to pursue this field of study.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"48 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.1.535.548","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. School evaluation is a sensitive process that involves teachers, students, and their parents in various ways. This article focuses on researching student evaluation by teachers in the subject of Technology in Slovak primary schools. The research aims to determine how teachers assess students in the subject of Technology. Methods. As a research tool, we used a self-designed questionnaire for teachers. We analysed the respondents' answers using descriptive statistical methods. To ascertain differences in responses between qualified and unqualified teachers, we employed the chi-square test. Results. By analysing the data obtained from 107 questionnaires, we found that technology teachers mostly employ an individual approach when evaluating students and emphasise the practical aspects of the subject. Among the evaluation methods, grading scales for summative student assessment prevail. At the same time, there were statistically significant differences between qualified and unqualified teachers. We also observed statistically significant differences in evaluations between qualified and unqualified teachers. Conclusion. For this reason, it is necessary to ensure an increase in the number of qualified and internally motivated technology teachers in primary schools, as only such teachers can motivate and inspire their students to pursue this field of study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯洛伐克小学技术学科的学生评价
目的学校评价是一个敏感的过程,涉及教师、学生及其家长的方方面面。本文主要研究斯洛伐克小学技术学科教师对学生的评价。研究旨在确定教师如何评价技术学科的学生。作为研究工具,我们使用了一份自行设计的教师问卷。我们使用描述性统计方法对受访者的回答进行了分析。为了确定合格教师和不合格教师在回答问题上的差异,我们采用了卡方检验法。通过分析 107 份问卷中获得的数据,我们发现科技教师在评价学生时大多采用个别评价法,并强调学科的实践性。在评价方法中,对学生进行终结性评价的评分表占主导地位。与此同时,合格教师和不合格教师之间存在着显著的统计学差异。我们还观察到,合格和不合格教师之间的评价在统计学上也存在显著差异。因此,有必要确保在小学增加合格的、有内在动力的技术教师,因为只有这样的教师才能激励和鼓舞学生从事这一领域的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Do All Isolated Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhages Need to Be Transferred to a Level 1 Trauma Center?" Sensing with (One or Many) Upconverting Nanoparticles Guest-Triggered Charge Transfer for Magnetic Change in Redox-Active MOF Magnets Molecular Engineering of Functional DNA Molecules toward Targeted Protein Degradation BX3-Mediated Directed Electrophilic Borylation: Advances, Applications, and Mechanistic Insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1