The Efficacy of the Smartphone App for the Self-Management of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Assessment of Their Quality through the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) in Italy

Life Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.3390/life14060760
Luca Scala, Gloria Giglioni, Luca Bertazzoni, Francesca Bonetti
{"title":"The Efficacy of the Smartphone App for the Self-Management of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Assessment of Their Quality through the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) in Italy","authors":"Luca Scala, Gloria Giglioni, Luca Bertazzoni, Francesca Bonetti","doi":"10.3390/life14060760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Smartphone apps for self-management are valuable tools to help manage low back pain (LBP) patients. The purposes of this systematic review were to (a) summarize the available studies on the efficacy of smartphone apps for self-management of LBP and (b) identify free applications available in Italy that offer strategies for LBP self-management and provide a qualitative assessment using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). According to the Prisma Checklist, six bibliographic databases were searched with the keywords ‘low back pain’, ‘mobile application’, ‘smartphone’, and ‘telemedicine’. In total, 852 records were screened, and 16 were included in the systematic review. Of the six RCTs included, four reported a statistically significant decrease in pain in favor of the app group, and two RCTs did not. Only in a non-RCT was there an increase in the disability score. In the application research conducted on mobile stores, we identified and rated 25 applications through MARS. The overall scores ranged from 1.93 to 3.92 for the IOS app and 1.73 to 4.25 for the Play Store app. The findings suggest that few apps meet satisfying quality, content, and functionality criteria for LBP self-management.","PeriodicalId":18182,"journal":{"name":"Life","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/life14060760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smartphone apps for self-management are valuable tools to help manage low back pain (LBP) patients. The purposes of this systematic review were to (a) summarize the available studies on the efficacy of smartphone apps for self-management of LBP and (b) identify free applications available in Italy that offer strategies for LBP self-management and provide a qualitative assessment using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). According to the Prisma Checklist, six bibliographic databases were searched with the keywords ‘low back pain’, ‘mobile application’, ‘smartphone’, and ‘telemedicine’. In total, 852 records were screened, and 16 were included in the systematic review. Of the six RCTs included, four reported a statistically significant decrease in pain in favor of the app group, and two RCTs did not. Only in a non-RCT was there an increase in the disability score. In the application research conducted on mobile stores, we identified and rated 25 applications through MARS. The overall scores ranged from 1.93 to 3.92 for the IOS app and 1.73 to 4.25 for the Play Store app. The findings suggest that few apps meet satisfying quality, content, and functionality criteria for LBP self-management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智能手机应用程序对腰背痛自我管理的功效:通过移动应用程序评分量表 (MARS) 对意大利应用程序质量的系统性回顾和评估
用于自我管理的智能手机应用程序是帮助管理腰背痛(LBP)患者的重要工具。本系统性综述的目的是:(a) 总结有关智能手机应用对腰背痛自我管理功效的现有研究;(b) 识别意大利现有的免费应用,这些应用提供了腰背痛自我管理的策略,并使用移动应用评分量表 (MARS) 进行了定性评估。根据 Prisma 核对表,以 "腰背痛"、"移动应用"、"智能手机 "和 "远程医疗 "为关键词搜索了六个文献数据库。共筛选出 852 条记录,其中 16 条被纳入系统综述。在纳入的六项研究性试验中,有四项报告显示应用组的疼痛明显减轻,两项则没有。只有在一项非研究性试验中,残疾评分有所增加。在对移动商店进行的应用研究中,我们通过 MARS 识别并评定了 25 个应用。IOS 应用程序的总分从 1.93 到 3.92 不等,Play 商店应用程序的总分从 1.73 到 4.25 不等。研究结果表明,很少有应用程序在质量、内容和功能方面符合枸杞多糖自我管理的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Personalized Management of Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Vitreoretinopathy Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformation in Preterm Infants: A Case Report and Review of the Literature Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Recent Update on Pathophysiology and Treatment Effect of FluoRoquinolones on Aortic Growth, aortic stIffness and wave refLEctionS (FRAGILES study) Leveraging Electronic Health Records to Predict the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1