Formation of Cognitive-Technological Competence as a Mechanism of Realisation of Rational Component in Training Undergraduate Students

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.15503/jecs2024.1.247.263
Natalia Ignatenko, Victor Savenco, A. Kryskov, N. Habrusieva, Remekh Tetiana, Diana Lemiszka
{"title":"Formation of Cognitive-Technological Competence as a Mechanism of Realisation of Rational Component in Training Undergraduate Students","authors":"Natalia Ignatenko, Victor Savenco, A. Kryskov, N. Habrusieva, Remekh Tetiana, Diana Lemiszka","doi":"10.15503/jecs2024.1.247.263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The purpose is to consider the theoretical and methodological foundations of the formation of cognitive-technological competence as a mechanism for implementing the rational component in the training of a history teacher, the essence of the concepts \"rationality in education\", \"rationality in science\", \"cognitive-technological competence\" is revealed”.\nMethods. The theoretical method of forming cognitive-technological competence in the process of studying the history of Europe and America has been substantiated, developed and tested. The model includes the unity of methodological, content-technological and evaluation-resultative components.\nResults. The analysis shows that focusing attention on the leading role of the teacher in the formation of the students’ mental activity requires the student to understand the logic and mechanisms of human mental development.\nConclusion. At the same time, a number of unresolved issues in the process of working with students were highlighted, in particular: the need for a broad discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of distance learning in the implementation of the rational component of undergraduate students, the development of students' responsibility for learning, training on the development of cognitive and technological competence of students of the master's degree in specialty 014.03 \"Secondary education ( history)\" in the conditions of a pandemic.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.1.247.263","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. The purpose is to consider the theoretical and methodological foundations of the formation of cognitive-technological competence as a mechanism for implementing the rational component in the training of a history teacher, the essence of the concepts "rationality in education", "rationality in science", "cognitive-technological competence" is revealed”. Methods. The theoretical method of forming cognitive-technological competence in the process of studying the history of Europe and America has been substantiated, developed and tested. The model includes the unity of methodological, content-technological and evaluation-resultative components. Results. The analysis shows that focusing attention on the leading role of the teacher in the formation of the students’ mental activity requires the student to understand the logic and mechanisms of human mental development. Conclusion. At the same time, a number of unresolved issues in the process of working with students were highlighted, in particular: the need for a broad discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of distance learning in the implementation of the rational component of undergraduate students, the development of students' responsibility for learning, training on the development of cognitive and technological competence of students of the master's degree in specialty 014.03 "Secondary education ( history)" in the conditions of a pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知技术能力的形成是培养本科生理性成分的实现机制
目的目的是研究形成认知-技术能力的理论和方法论基础,以此作为在历史教师培训中落实理性成分的机制,揭示 "教育中的理性"、"科学中的理性"、"认知-技术能力 "等概念的本质。在学习欧美历史过程中形成认知-技术能力的理论方法已经得到证实、发展和检验。该模型包括方法、内容-技术和评价-结果三个部分的统一。分析表明,关注教师在学生思维活动形成过程中的主导作用,要求学生理解人类思维发展的逻辑和机制。同时,还强调了在与学生合作过程中一些尚未解决的问题,特别是:需要广泛讨论在实施本科生理性部分时远程学习的优缺点、培养学生的学习责任感、在大流行病条件下对专业 014.03 "中等教育(历史)"硕士学位学生进行认知和技术能力发展培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Do All Isolated Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhages Need to Be Transferred to a Level 1 Trauma Center?" Controlling Product Selectivity in Oxidative Coupling of Methane by Identifying and Regulating Oxygen Species Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Brightening Upconversion Nanoparticles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1