Optimizing sedation in gastroscopy: a study on the etomidate/propofol mixture ratio

Shuyi Tang, Yuling Zheng, Xiaoling Li, Yiwen Zhang, Zhongqi Zhang
{"title":"Optimizing sedation in gastroscopy: a study on the etomidate/propofol mixture ratio","authors":"Shuyi Tang, Yuling Zheng, Xiaoling Li, Yiwen Zhang, Zhongqi Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1392141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Propofol and etomidate are the most commonly used sedative agents in procedural sedation, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. However, there remains considerable controversy regarding the optimal ratio for the mixture of these two drugs, warranting further investigation. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the optimal ratio for combining propofol and etomidate during gastroscopy.This study is a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial. One hundred and sixty-two patients from July 2019 to December 2022 were evenly classified into three groups using a random number table as follows: (1) P group (propofol); (2) EP1 group (5 mL etomidate +10 mL propofol); (3) EP2 group (10 mL etomidate +10 mL), 54 patients per group. The medications, including a pre-sedation dose of 50 μg/kg dezocine followed by sedatives, ceasing when the patient’s eyelash reflex vanished, indicating adequate sedation. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurements taken before anesthesia (T1), immediately after the administration of sedatives (T2), immediately gastroscopic insertion (T3) and immediately recovery (T4) were determined. Additional, perioperative related outcomes and adverse events were also recorded.The EP2 group exhibited a higher MAP at T2 compared to the P and EP1 groups (p < 0.05). Calculated decreases in MAP revealed values of 19.1, 18.8, and 13.8% for the P, EP1, and EP2 groups at T2, respectively. Adverse events: Group EP2 exhibited a significantly lower hypotension incidence (11.1%) compared to the Propofol group (50%) and EP1 (31.5%). Concerning injection pain, Group EP2 also showing a significant decrease in comparison to P and EP1 groups (p < 0.05).The use of a mixture of 10 mL etomidate and 10 mL propofol (at a 1:1 ratio) combined with dezocine for painless gastroscopy demonstrates hemodynamic stability, a low incidence of adverse reactions.https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=39874","PeriodicalId":502302,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"53 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1392141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Propofol and etomidate are the most commonly used sedative agents in procedural sedation, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. However, there remains considerable controversy regarding the optimal ratio for the mixture of these two drugs, warranting further investigation. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the optimal ratio for combining propofol and etomidate during gastroscopy.This study is a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial. One hundred and sixty-two patients from July 2019 to December 2022 were evenly classified into three groups using a random number table as follows: (1) P group (propofol); (2) EP1 group (5 mL etomidate +10 mL propofol); (3) EP2 group (10 mL etomidate +10 mL), 54 patients per group. The medications, including a pre-sedation dose of 50 μg/kg dezocine followed by sedatives, ceasing when the patient’s eyelash reflex vanished, indicating adequate sedation. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurements taken before anesthesia (T1), immediately after the administration of sedatives (T2), immediately gastroscopic insertion (T3) and immediately recovery (T4) were determined. Additional, perioperative related outcomes and adverse events were also recorded.The EP2 group exhibited a higher MAP at T2 compared to the P and EP1 groups (p < 0.05). Calculated decreases in MAP revealed values of 19.1, 18.8, and 13.8% for the P, EP1, and EP2 groups at T2, respectively. Adverse events: Group EP2 exhibited a significantly lower hypotension incidence (11.1%) compared to the Propofol group (50%) and EP1 (31.5%). Concerning injection pain, Group EP2 also showing a significant decrease in comparison to P and EP1 groups (p < 0.05).The use of a mixture of 10 mL etomidate and 10 mL propofol (at a 1:1 ratio) combined with dezocine for painless gastroscopy demonstrates hemodynamic stability, a low incidence of adverse reactions.https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=39874
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃镜检查中的镇静优化:关于依托咪酯/丙泊酚混合物比例的研究
丙泊酚和依托咪酯是手术镇静中最常用的镇静剂,各有利弊。然而,关于这两种药物混合使用的最佳比例仍存在相当大的争议,值得进一步研究。因此,本研究旨在探讨胃镜检查时丙泊酚和依托咪酯的最佳混合比例。本研究是一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照临床试验。采用随机数字表将2019年7月至2022年12月的162例患者平均分为以下三组:(1)P组(丙泊酚);(2)EP1组(5 mL依托咪酯+10 mL丙泊酚);(3)EP2组(10 mL依托咪酯+10 mL),每组54名患者。用药包括镇静前服用 50 μg/kg 地佐辛,然后服用镇静剂,当患者睫毛反射消失时停止用药,表明镇静充分。测定了麻醉前(T1)、使用镇静剂后立即(T2)、插入胃镜后立即(T3)和恢复后立即(T4)的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)和外周血氧饱和度(SpO2)。与 P 组和 EP1 组相比,EP2 组在 T2 时的 MAP 更高(p < 0.05)。计算发现,P组、EP1组和EP2组在T2时的MAP下降值分别为19.1%、18.8%和13.8%。不良事件:EP2 组的低血压发生率(11.1%)明显低于异丙酚组(50%)和 EP1 组(31.5%)。在注射疼痛方面,EP2 组与 P 组和 EP1 组相比也有显著下降(p < 0.05)。使用 10 毫升依托咪酯和 10 毫升丙泊酚(比例为 1:1)的混合物结合地佐辛进行无痛胃镜检查显示了血流动力学的稳定性和较低的不良反应发生率。https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=39874。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mycobacterium marinum hand infection: a case report and literature review Strengthening surgical healthcare research capacity in sub-Saharan Africa: impact of a research training programme in Nigeria Association between serum vitamin D and the risk of diabetic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes Maternal puerperal infection caused by Parabacteroides goldsteinii: a case report Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis in a patient with polycystic kidney disease without underlying risk factors: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1