Welfare state contract and family solidarity: Do informal carers prefer more welfare state support?

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK International Journal of Social Welfare Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1111/ijsw.12685
Anna Willems, Dimitri Mortelmans, Anina Vercruyssen
{"title":"Welfare state contract and family solidarity: Do informal carers prefer more welfare state support?","authors":"Anna Willems,&nbsp;Dimitri Mortelmans,&nbsp;Anina Vercruyssen","doi":"10.1111/ijsw.12685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since the late 20th century, a combination of sociodemographic changes and increasing costs of pensions, health and social care challenged the intergenerational welfare contract. Besides, governments have been substituting more parts of care services for informal care. Given this reality, little is known to what extent informal cares prefer a higher government responsibility. Nonetheless, they demonstrate solidarity towards other generations through their actions. In this article, we question whether the intensity of informal caregiving, expressed in hours a week, and age group affects preferences towards welfare distributions and policies supporting informal caregivers. To do so, we have used a unique dataset of stratified, representative data about intergenerational exchanges between individuals in Belgium. We only see a significant effect of high intensity caregiving on general welfare state support. For the policy that targets informal caregivers we see no differences between informal caregivers and non-carers. We argue that informal care status or age cannot fully grasp people's preferences of welfare state support, but lies in the intersection of individual characteristics. A recent study about informal caregivers in Flanders highlighted significant differences in support needs across age groups. Notably, the persons at working age, would feel most helped by reconciliation measures such as paid informal care leave. Moreover, support needs correlated with the intensity of caregiving, as those providing 10 h or more expressed a greater need for financial support, work-life balance policies and help from professional services (Bracke et al. <i>Zorgenquête 2021: Inhoudelijk rapport</i>, 2022). Recognizing the importance of different support needs of informal caregivers, underscores the necessity for comprehensive approaches in family and informal care policies to address both caregiver and recipient needs effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":47567,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Welfare","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijsw.12685","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsw.12685","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the late 20th century, a combination of sociodemographic changes and increasing costs of pensions, health and social care challenged the intergenerational welfare contract. Besides, governments have been substituting more parts of care services for informal care. Given this reality, little is known to what extent informal cares prefer a higher government responsibility. Nonetheless, they demonstrate solidarity towards other generations through their actions. In this article, we question whether the intensity of informal caregiving, expressed in hours a week, and age group affects preferences towards welfare distributions and policies supporting informal caregivers. To do so, we have used a unique dataset of stratified, representative data about intergenerational exchanges between individuals in Belgium. We only see a significant effect of high intensity caregiving on general welfare state support. For the policy that targets informal caregivers we see no differences between informal caregivers and non-carers. We argue that informal care status or age cannot fully grasp people's preferences of welfare state support, but lies in the intersection of individual characteristics. A recent study about informal caregivers in Flanders highlighted significant differences in support needs across age groups. Notably, the persons at working age, would feel most helped by reconciliation measures such as paid informal care leave. Moreover, support needs correlated with the intensity of caregiving, as those providing 10 h or more expressed a greater need for financial support, work-life balance policies and help from professional services (Bracke et al. Zorgenquête 2021: Inhoudelijk rapport, 2022). Recognizing the importance of different support needs of informal caregivers, underscores the necessity for comprehensive approaches in family and informal care policies to address both caregiver and recipient needs effectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
福利国家契约与家庭团结:非正规照顾者更喜欢福利国家提供更多支持吗?
自 20 世纪末以来,社会人口结构的变化以及养老金、医疗和社会护理成本的不断增加,对代际福利契约提出了挑战。此外,政府一直在用更多的护理服务取代非正式护理。在这种现实情况下,人们对非正规护理在多大程度上倾向于由政府承担更多责任知之甚少。尽管如此,他们还是通过自己的行动表现出对其他几代人的声援。在本文中,我们将探讨以每周小时数表示的非正规护理强度和年龄组是否会影响对福利分配和支持非正规护理者政策的偏好。为此,我们使用了一个独特的数据集,其中包含比利时个人代际交流的分层代表性数据。我们只看到了高强度护理对一般福利国家支持的重大影响。对于针对非正规照顾者的政策,我们发现非正规照顾者和非照顾者之间没有差异。我们认为,非正规照护者的身份或年龄并不能完全反映人们对福利国家支持的偏好,而在于个人特征的交叉影响。最近一项关于佛兰德非正规护理人员的研究强调了不同年龄段人群在支持需求方面的显著差异。值得注意的是,处于工作年龄段的人认为带薪非正式护理假等调节措施对他们的帮助最大。此外,支持需求与护理强度相关,因为那些提供 10 小时或更长时间护理的人表示更需要经济支持、工作与生活平衡政策以及专业服务的帮助(Bracke 等,Zorgenquête 2021:Inhoudelijk rapport,2022 年)。认识到非正规照护者的不同支持需求的重要性,强调了在家庭和非正规照护政策中采取综合方法的必要性,以有效满足照护者和受照护者的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Welfare publishes original articles in English on social welfare and social work. Its interdisciplinary approach and comparative perspective promote examination of the most pressing social welfare issues of the day by researchers from the various branches of the applied social sciences. The journal seeks to disseminate knowledge and to encourage debate about these issues and their regional and global implications.
期刊最新文献
Out-of-home care placement patterns of children within the Swedish child welfare system: Findings from group-based trajectory modelling Issue Information Poverty exposure and poverty persistence for large families in Western Europe. A dynamic perspective Unpacking vulnerability among migrant minors in the EU: A case study of vulnerability among migrant minors in Spain Three challenges of social protection in sub-Saharan Africa: informality, climate change and pandemics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1