Analysis of risk factors and clinical implications for diabetes in first-degree relatives in the northeastern region of China

Zhenglin He, H. Yamana, Hideo Yasunaga, Hongjun Li, Xue Wang
{"title":"Analysis of risk factors and clinical implications for diabetes in first-degree relatives in the northeastern region of China","authors":"Zhenglin He, H. Yamana, Hideo Yasunaga, Hongjun Li, Xue Wang","doi":"10.3389/fendo.2024.1385583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prevalence of diabetes has risen fast with a considerable weighted prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes or uncontrolled diabetes. Then it becomes more necessary to timely screen out and monitor high-risk populations who are likely to be ignored during the COVID-19 pandemic. To classify and find the common risks of undiagnosed diabetes and uncontrolled diabetes, it’s beneficial to put specific risk control measures into effect for comprehensive primary care. Especially, there is a need for accurate yet accessible prediction models.Based on a cross-sectional study and secondary analysis on the health examination held in Changchun City (2016), we aimed to evaluate the factors associated with hyperglycemia, analyze the management status of T2DM, and determine the best cutoff value of incidence of diabetes in the first-degree relatives to suggest the necessity of early diagnosis of diabetes after first screening.A total of 5658 volunteers were analyzed. Prevalence of T2DM and impaired fasting glucose were 8.4% (n=477) and 11.5% (n=648), respectively. There were 925 participants (16.3%) with a family history of T2DM in their first-degree relatives. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that family history was associated with hyperglycemia. Among the 477 patients with T2DM, 40.9% had not been previously diagnosed. The predictive equation was calculated with the following logistic regression parameters with 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67–0.76) of the area under the ROC curve, 64.0% of sensitivity and 29% of specificity (P < 0.001): P = \\frac{1}{1 + e^{-z}}, where z = -3.08 + [0.89 (Family history-group) + 0.69 (age-group)+ 0.25 (BMI-group)]. Positive family history was associated with the diagnosis of T2DM, but not glucose level in the diagnosed patients. The best cutoff value of incidence of diabetes in the first-degree relatives was 9.55% (P < 0.001).Family history of diabetes was independently associated with glucose dysfunction. Classification by the first-degree relatives with diabetes is prominent for targeting high-risk population. Meanwhile, positive family history of diabetes was associated with diabetes being diagnosed rather than the glycemic control in patients who had been diagnosed. It’s necessary to emphasize the linkage between early diagnosis and positive family history for high proportions of undiagnosed T2DM.","PeriodicalId":505784,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","volume":"23 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1385583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of diabetes has risen fast with a considerable weighted prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes or uncontrolled diabetes. Then it becomes more necessary to timely screen out and monitor high-risk populations who are likely to be ignored during the COVID-19 pandemic. To classify and find the common risks of undiagnosed diabetes and uncontrolled diabetes, it’s beneficial to put specific risk control measures into effect for comprehensive primary care. Especially, there is a need for accurate yet accessible prediction models.Based on a cross-sectional study and secondary analysis on the health examination held in Changchun City (2016), we aimed to evaluate the factors associated with hyperglycemia, analyze the management status of T2DM, and determine the best cutoff value of incidence of diabetes in the first-degree relatives to suggest the necessity of early diagnosis of diabetes after first screening.A total of 5658 volunteers were analyzed. Prevalence of T2DM and impaired fasting glucose were 8.4% (n=477) and 11.5% (n=648), respectively. There were 925 participants (16.3%) with a family history of T2DM in their first-degree relatives. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that family history was associated with hyperglycemia. Among the 477 patients with T2DM, 40.9% had not been previously diagnosed. The predictive equation was calculated with the following logistic regression parameters with 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67–0.76) of the area under the ROC curve, 64.0% of sensitivity and 29% of specificity (P < 0.001): P = \frac{1}{1 + e^{-z}}, where z = -3.08 + [0.89 (Family history-group) + 0.69 (age-group)+ 0.25 (BMI-group)]. Positive family history was associated with the diagnosis of T2DM, but not glucose level in the diagnosed patients. The best cutoff value of incidence of diabetes in the first-degree relatives was 9.55% (P < 0.001).Family history of diabetes was independently associated with glucose dysfunction. Classification by the first-degree relatives with diabetes is prominent for targeting high-risk population. Meanwhile, positive family history of diabetes was associated with diabetes being diagnosed rather than the glycemic control in patients who had been diagnosed. It’s necessary to emphasize the linkage between early diagnosis and positive family history for high proportions of undiagnosed T2DM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国东北地区一级亲属患糖尿病的风险因素分析及临床影响
糖尿病的发病率快速上升,未确诊或未控制的糖尿病的加权发病率相当高。因此,更有必要及时筛查和监测在 COVID-19 大流行期间容易被忽视的高危人群。对未确诊糖尿病和未控制糖尿病的常见风险进行分类和查找,有利于将具体的风险控制措施落实到全面的初级保健中。基于对长春市 2016 年健康体检的横断面研究和二次分析,我们旨在评估高血糖的相关因素,分析 T2DM 的管理现状,确定一级亲属糖尿病发病率的最佳临界值,提示糖尿病初筛后早期诊断的必要性。T2DM和空腹血糖受损的患病率分别为8.4%(477人)和11.5%(648人)。有 925 名参与者(16.3%)的一级亲属有 T2DM 家族史。多变量分析表明,家族史与高血糖有关。在 477 名 T2DM 患者中,40.9% 以前未确诊过。根据以下逻辑回归参数计算出预测方程,ROC 曲线下面积为 0.71(95% CI:0.67-0.76),灵敏度为 64.0%,特异度为 29%(P < 0.001):P = \frac{1}{1 + e^{-z}},其中 z = -3.08 + [0.89(家族史组)+ 0.69(年龄组)+ 0.25(体重指数组)]。阳性家族史与 T2DM 的诊断有关,但与确诊患者的血糖水平无关。一级亲属糖尿病发病率的最佳临界值为 9.55%(P < 0.001)。根据一级亲属的糖尿病发病率进行分类,对于锁定高危人群具有重要意义。同时,阳性糖尿病家族史与糖尿病确诊有关,而不是与确诊患者的血糖控制有关。对于大量未确诊的 T2DM 患者,有必要强调早期诊断与阳性家族史之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
T1 mapping combined with arterial spin labeling MRI to identify renal injury in patients with liver cirrhosis Adjunctive benefits of low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for obesity frequent chronic conditions: a systematic review Cadmium activation of wild-type and constitutively active estrogen receptor alpha Editorial: Preventing cardiovascular complications of type 2 diabetes The causal relationship between antihypertensive drugs and depression: a Mendelian randomization study of drug targets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1