Heuristic biases influencing individual stock investment decisions: a hybrid fuzzy DELPHI-AHP-DEMATEL approach

R. Abhijith, D. Bijulal
{"title":"Heuristic biases influencing individual stock investment decisions: a hybrid fuzzy DELPHI-AHP-DEMATEL approach","authors":"R. Abhijith, D. Bijulal","doi":"10.1108/jamr-03-2024-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeStock investing choices of individual investors are predominantly influenced by heuristic biases, leading to sub-optimal choices. Accordingly, this study aims to identify, categorize, validate, prioritize, and find causality among the heuristic biases shaping stock investment decisions of individual investors.Design/methodology/approachThis research offers original contribution by employing a hybrid approach combining fuzzy DELPHI method (FDM), fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP), and fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (F-DEMATEL) techniques to validate, prioritize, and find causality among the heuristic biases.FindingsTwenty sub-heuristic biases were identified under five main heuristic bias categories. Out of which, 17 were validated using FDM. Further, availability and representativeness within main heuristic categories, and availability cascade and retrievability within sub-heuristic biases were prioritized using FAHP. Overconfidence and availability were identified as the causes among the five main biases by F-DEMATEL.Practical implicationsThis study offers the stock investors a deeper understanding of heuristic biases and empowers them to make rational investment decisions.Originality/valueThis paper is the inaugural effort to identify, categorize, validate, prioritize and examine the cause-and-effect relationship among the heuristic biases.","PeriodicalId":46158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Management Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jamr-03-2024-0093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeStock investing choices of individual investors are predominantly influenced by heuristic biases, leading to sub-optimal choices. Accordingly, this study aims to identify, categorize, validate, prioritize, and find causality among the heuristic biases shaping stock investment decisions of individual investors.Design/methodology/approachThis research offers original contribution by employing a hybrid approach combining fuzzy DELPHI method (FDM), fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP), and fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (F-DEMATEL) techniques to validate, prioritize, and find causality among the heuristic biases.FindingsTwenty sub-heuristic biases were identified under five main heuristic bias categories. Out of which, 17 were validated using FDM. Further, availability and representativeness within main heuristic categories, and availability cascade and retrievability within sub-heuristic biases were prioritized using FAHP. Overconfidence and availability were identified as the causes among the five main biases by F-DEMATEL.Practical implicationsThis study offers the stock investors a deeper understanding of heuristic biases and empowers them to make rational investment decisions.Originality/valueThis paper is the inaugural effort to identify, categorize, validate, prioritize and examine the cause-and-effect relationship among the heuristic biases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响个股投资决策的启发式偏差:一种混合模糊 DELPHI-AHP-DEMATEL 方法
目的 个人投资者的股票投资选择主要受启发式偏差的影响,从而导致次优选择。因此,本研究旨在对影响个人投资者股票投资决策的启发式偏差进行识别、分类、验证、优先排序,并找出它们之间的因果关系。设计/方法/途径本研究采用模糊 DELPHI 法 (FDM)、模糊分析层次过程 (FAHP) 和模糊决策试验和评估实验室 (F-DEMATEL) 技术相结合的混合方法,对启发式偏差进行验证、优先排序并找出其中的因果关系,从而做出了原创性贡献。其中,17 个已通过 FDM 验证。此外,使用 FAHP 对主要启发式偏差类别中的可用性和代表性,以及子启发式偏差中的可用性级联和可检索性进行了优先排序。通过 F-DEMATEL,过度自信和可用性被确定为五种主要偏差的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
The type of supplier involvement in new product development in the automotive industry: metaheuristic-based K-means clustering and analytic hierarchical process methods Resilience of developing economies to external shocks: empirical evidence from CEMAC countries Unbraiding the effect of policy benefits on subjective well-being: the mediating role of work-related well-being Development and psychometric validation of a scale for sources of resistance to change in higher education institutions Assessment of bus fleet service quality: a graph theoretical approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1