Assessing Productivity Dynamics in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry: A Comparative Analysis of the Foreign and the Domestic Ownership Influences

IF 1.3 Q1 AREA STUDIES Millennial Asia Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1177/09763996241255424
Madan Dhanora, Mohd Shadab Danish
{"title":"Assessing Productivity Dynamics in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry: A Comparative Analysis of the Foreign and the Domestic Ownership Influences","authors":"Madan Dhanora, Mohd Shadab Danish","doi":"10.1177/09763996241255424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the impact of competition (foreign vs. domestic) on the total factor productivity of domestic firms. We used two specific indicators to measure foreign and domestic competition in the Indian pharmaceutical industry: market shares and The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, constructed for a five-digit NIC level, highlighting the intensity of product-level competition. The Levinsohn and Petrin methods calculate the total factor productivity, and dynamic panel data estimators are applied to estimate the model. The research findings indicate that foreign presence has a notable and statistically significant influence on the productivity levels of domestic firms. In contrast, the impact of domestic competition is found to be inconsequential. This research addresses the policy debate by providing convincing evidence that the existence of Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) can increase local business productivity through knowledge spillovers and competitiveness.","PeriodicalId":41791,"journal":{"name":"Millennial Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Millennial Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996241255424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of competition (foreign vs. domestic) on the total factor productivity of domestic firms. We used two specific indicators to measure foreign and domestic competition in the Indian pharmaceutical industry: market shares and The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, constructed for a five-digit NIC level, highlighting the intensity of product-level competition. The Levinsohn and Petrin methods calculate the total factor productivity, and dynamic panel data estimators are applied to estimate the model. The research findings indicate that foreign presence has a notable and statistically significant influence on the productivity levels of domestic firms. In contrast, the impact of domestic competition is found to be inconsequential. This research addresses the policy debate by providing convincing evidence that the existence of Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) can increase local business productivity through knowledge spillovers and competitiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估印度制药业的生产力动态:外资和内资所有权影响因素的比较分析
本研究探讨了竞争(国外竞争与国内竞争)对国内企业全要素生产率的影响。我们使用了两个具体指标来衡量印度制药业的国内外竞争情况:市场份额和赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数(Herfindahl-Hirschman Index)。Levinsohn 和 Petrin 方法计算了全要素生产率,并采用动态面板数据估算器对模型进行了估算。研究结果表明,外资企业的存在对国内企业的生产率水平有着显著的影响,且在统计上具有重要意义。相比之下,国内竞争的影响则微不足道。这项研究为政策辩论提供了令人信服的证据,证明跨国企业的存在可以通过知识外溢和竞争力提高本地企业的生产率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Millennial Asia
Millennial Asia AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Millennial Asia: An International Journal of Asian Studies is a multidisciplinary, refereed biannual journal of the Association of Asia Scholars (AAS)–an association of the alumni of the Asian Scholarship Foundation (ASF). It aims to encourage multifaceted, multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research on Asia, in order to understand its fast changing context as a growth pole of global economy. By providing a forum for Asian scholars situated globally, it promotes dialogue between the global academic community, civil society and policy makers on Asian issues. The journal examines Asia on a regional and comparative basis, emphasizing patterns and tendencies that go beyond national borders and are globally relevant. Modern and contemporary Asia has witnessed dynamic transformations in cultures, societies, economies and political institutions, among others. It confronts issues of collective identity formation, ecological crisis, rapid economic change and resurgence of religion and communal identifies while embracing globalization. An analysis of past experiences can help produce a deeper understanding of contemporary change. In particular, the journal is interested in locating contemporary changes within a historical perspective, through the use of interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approaches. This way, it hopes to promote comparative studies involving Asia’s various regions. The journal brings out both thematic and general issues and the thrust areas are: Asian integration, Asian economies, sociology, culture, politics, governance, security, development issues, arts and literature and any other such issue as the editorial board may deem fit. The core fields include development encompassing agriculture, industry, regional trade, social sectors like health and education and development policy across the region and in specific countries in a comparative perspective.
期刊最新文献
Healthcare Expenditure, Health Outcomes and Economic Growth: A Study of BRICS Countries Effect of Technical NTMs on Indian Exports to ASEAN: What Role Do Logistics and Governance Capabilities Play? Unravelling the Dynamics of Landscape Changes and Climate-sensitive Diseases in Kuttanad Wetland Ecosystem, India Navigating the Silver Seas of Ageing: A Phenomenological Study on Life Course Impacts on Older Adults in Senior Living Facilities Politics of Infrastructural Developmentalism: A Spatial Reading of the Colombo Port City Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1