Instrument Development for Study Programs Excellence Evaluation Based on Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model

Surya Akbar, Tezar Samekto Darungan, Dinda Saufia Rahma
{"title":"Instrument Development for Study Programs Excellence Evaluation Based on Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model","authors":"Surya Akbar, Tezar Samekto Darungan, Dinda Saufia Rahma","doi":"10.22146/jpki.91960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The study programs excellence stated in the institution's vision and mission acts as a guide for the institution in carrying out its activities. That excellence must be reflected in all aspects of academic activities. Evaluation of the implementation and achievement of study program’s excellence is important to fulfill the vision, and mission of the institution. This research aims to develop an evaluation instrument that is useful for monitoring the achievement of study program’s excellence. Methods: Two part of instrument development were carried out in this study, namely: instrument development, and instrument validation process. Instrument development part consist of two stage (item and scale development, and expert judgement). Meanwhile, instrument validation process part consist of 5 stages of comprehensive validation process by Sireci. This validation process used argument based validation concept. Results: This instrument uses the Kirkpatrick model which consists of 4 evaluation levels. Each level consists of several dimensions. A total of 55 instrument items were proven valid (r>0.217) and reliable (Cronbach’s Alpha>0.7). The instrument uses 2 types of data in the assessment process, namely primary data (measuring responses from the academic community using a questionnaire), and secondary data (assessment of document evidence). Conclusion: The instrument evaluation is prepared for the purpose of providing an overview of the implementation and achievement of institutional’s excellence. This is useful in providing valuable information to the institution to set strategies and policies to fulfill the institution's excellence.The instrument proved to be valid and reliable by an argument-based validation analysis.","PeriodicalId":17805,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education","volume":"87 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.91960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study programs excellence stated in the institution's vision and mission acts as a guide for the institution in carrying out its activities. That excellence must be reflected in all aspects of academic activities. Evaluation of the implementation and achievement of study program’s excellence is important to fulfill the vision, and mission of the institution. This research aims to develop an evaluation instrument that is useful for monitoring the achievement of study program’s excellence. Methods: Two part of instrument development were carried out in this study, namely: instrument development, and instrument validation process. Instrument development part consist of two stage (item and scale development, and expert judgement). Meanwhile, instrument validation process part consist of 5 stages of comprehensive validation process by Sireci. This validation process used argument based validation concept. Results: This instrument uses the Kirkpatrick model which consists of 4 evaluation levels. Each level consists of several dimensions. A total of 55 instrument items were proven valid (r>0.217) and reliable (Cronbach’s Alpha>0.7). The instrument uses 2 types of data in the assessment process, namely primary data (measuring responses from the academic community using a questionnaire), and secondary data (assessment of document evidence). Conclusion: The instrument evaluation is prepared for the purpose of providing an overview of the implementation and achievement of institutional’s excellence. This is useful in providing valuable information to the institution to set strategies and policies to fulfill the institution's excellence.The instrument proved to be valid and reliable by an argument-based validation analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于柯克帕特里克评价模型的学习计划卓越性评价工具开发
背景:学校愿景和使命中的卓越研究计划是学校开展活动的指南。卓越必须体现在学术活动的各个方面。对卓越学习计划的实施和实现情况进行评估,对于实现学校的愿景和使命非常重要。本研究旨在开发一种评估工具,用于监测学习计划卓越性的实现情况。方法:本研究进行了两个部分的工具开发,即工具开发和工具验证过程。工具开发包括两个阶段(项目和量表开发以及专家评判)。同时,工具验证过程由 Sireci 的 5 个阶段的综合验证过程组成。该验证过程采用了基于论证的验证概念。结果该工具采用柯克帕特里克模型,该模型由 4 个评价等级组成。每个等级由多个维度组成。共有 55 个项目被证明有效(r>0.217)且可靠(Cronbach's Alpha>0.7)。该工具在评估过程中使用了两类数据,即第一类数据(使用调查问卷测量学术界的反应)和第二类数据(评估文件证据)。结论编制工具评估的目的是提供机构卓越性实施和成就的概况。通过基于论证的验证分析,该工具被证明是有效和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inquiry Learning Methods to Increase Student Motivation and Learning Outcomes The Noteworthiness of Constructive Feedback and Student-Reflection to Approach Competence-Based Curriculum: An Explanatory Study of Medical Schools in Indonesia The Relationship Between Anatomy Identification Test Scores and The Suitability in V/A/R/K Modality Usage Between Study Habit and Learning Style COMPARISON OF HISTOLOGY PRACTICUM EXAM RESULTS BASED ON THE LEARNING STYLE OF MEDICAL STUDENTS Description of The Professional Identity of First-Level Clinical Medical Students and The Various Factors That Facilitate Its Formation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1