News/Discussion Values and Interactivity in Corporate Social Responsibility Communication via Social Media

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Management Communication Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1177/08933189241261671
Z. Lew, C. Stohl
{"title":"News/Discussion Values and Interactivity in Corporate Social Responsibility Communication via Social Media","authors":"Z. Lew, C. Stohl","doi":"10.1177/08933189241261671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media have great potential to facilitate corporate social responsibility (CSR) dialogue between companies and their stakeholders, but two fundamental issues remain: how to encourage greater participation/dialogue and how to avoid the development of echo chambers, whereby participants merely reinforce their previously held views, potentially increasing the polarization of stakeholders. The problem of participation is grounded in people’s reluctance to comment on social media, and concerns with echo chambers arise when social media comments merely reinforce company statements. This research hypothesized that people’s willingness to comment increases when company replies are perceived to be contingent on past comments and when there is uncertainty, rather than negativity, in the comments. Results supported only the latter. Additionally, the study investigated the valence of comments and responses, exploring whether valenced comments engender potentially opinion-reinforcing echo chambers. Results showed that uncertainty tended to foster more interaction and questions, and that negativity inspired more negative comments.","PeriodicalId":47743,"journal":{"name":"Management Communication Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Communication Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189241261671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media have great potential to facilitate corporate social responsibility (CSR) dialogue between companies and their stakeholders, but two fundamental issues remain: how to encourage greater participation/dialogue and how to avoid the development of echo chambers, whereby participants merely reinforce their previously held views, potentially increasing the polarization of stakeholders. The problem of participation is grounded in people’s reluctance to comment on social media, and concerns with echo chambers arise when social media comments merely reinforce company statements. This research hypothesized that people’s willingness to comment increases when company replies are perceived to be contingent on past comments and when there is uncertainty, rather than negativity, in the comments. Results supported only the latter. Additionally, the study investigated the valence of comments and responses, exploring whether valenced comments engender potentially opinion-reinforcing echo chambers. Results showed that uncertainty tended to foster more interaction and questions, and that negativity inspired more negative comments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新闻/讨论 通过社交媒体传播企业社会责任的价值和互动性
社交媒体在促进公司与其利益相关者之间的企业社会责任(CSR)对话方面具有巨大潜力,但仍存在两个基本问题:如何鼓励更多的参与/对话,以及如何避免形成回音室,即参与者只是强化其先前持有的观点,从而可能加剧利益相关者的两极分化。参与问题的根源在于人们不愿在社交媒体上发表评论,而当社交媒体上的评论只是强化公司声明时,就会产生回音室问题。本研究假设,如果公司的回复被认为取决于过去的评论,而且评论中存在不确定性而非消极性,那么人们发表评论的意愿就会增加。结果仅支持后者。此外,研究还调查了评论和回复的价值,探讨有价值的评论是否会产生潜在的意见强化回音室。结果显示,不确定性往往会促进更多的互动和提问,而否定性则会激发更多的负面评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
16.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Management Communication Quarterly presents conceptually rigorous, empirically-driven, and practice-relevant research from across the organizational and management communication fields and has strong appeal across all disciplines concerned with organizational studies and the management sciences. Authors are encouraged to submit original theoretical and empirical manuscripts from a wide variety of methodological perspectives covering such areas as management, communication, organizational studies, organizational behavior and HRM, organizational theory and strategy, critical management studies, leadership, information systems, knowledge and innovation, globalization and international management, corporate communication, and cultural and intercultural studies.
期刊最新文献
Technical Anonymity and Employees’ Willingness to Speak Up: Influences of Voice Solicitation, General Timeliness, and Psychological Safety Affective Sensemaking of Relational Precarities: Resilience as Becoming in Pandemic Shifting to Remote Work CSR Communication and the Polarization of Public Discourses: Introduction to the Special Issue From Being to Doing: Exploring the Situated Discourses and Performances of Work Engagement Book Review: Organizational Paradox
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1