Work Outcomes and Well-being Among Working Women: A Systematic Literature Review

Syara Shazanna Zulkifli, Hazalizah Hamzah
{"title":"Work Outcomes and Well-being Among Working Women: A Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Syara Shazanna Zulkifli, Hazalizah Hamzah","doi":"10.47836/pjssh.32.2.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impact of work outcomes (work stress, work-life balance, workplace bullying, and support) on the well-being of working women has been argued for decades. As the rate of employed women rises, the negative impacts of work outcomes on well-being require urgent investigation to retain employees. Thus, this review identifies the associations between work outcomes and psychological well-being among working women. Utilising seven databases (EBSCOhost Research Database, Scopus, Sage Publications, PubMed, Taylor and Francis Online, Google Scholar, and Wiley Online), a total of 13 quantitative studies and ten qualitative studies were included in the review. This review reported moderate links between work stress and well-being (r = -0.20 to -0.44), weak to strong links between work-life balance and well-being (r = 0.12 to 0.70), moderate links between workplace bullying and well-being (r = -0.21 to -0.24), and weak to moderate links between support and well-being (r = 0.20 to 0.38). The most thoroughly researched constructs were work-life balance, workplace bullying, and well-being. Leaders’ characteristics, leadership style, employer maltreatment, and workplace bullying have harmed workers’ well-being. Furthermore, job stress, workload, staff shortage, loss of privacy, and prejudice detrimentally impacted well-being. Notably, qualitative studies on work stress and support experience are lacking. Overall, studies on work outcomes and well-being among working females are limited. This review identifies the current gaps in work outcomes and well-being. It provides recommendations for future research directions and informs organisations on the importance of work outcomes on the well-being of these working women.","PeriodicalId":125431,"journal":{"name":"Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":"116 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.32.2.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of work outcomes (work stress, work-life balance, workplace bullying, and support) on the well-being of working women has been argued for decades. As the rate of employed women rises, the negative impacts of work outcomes on well-being require urgent investigation to retain employees. Thus, this review identifies the associations between work outcomes and psychological well-being among working women. Utilising seven databases (EBSCOhost Research Database, Scopus, Sage Publications, PubMed, Taylor and Francis Online, Google Scholar, and Wiley Online), a total of 13 quantitative studies and ten qualitative studies were included in the review. This review reported moderate links between work stress and well-being (r = -0.20 to -0.44), weak to strong links between work-life balance and well-being (r = 0.12 to 0.70), moderate links between workplace bullying and well-being (r = -0.21 to -0.24), and weak to moderate links between support and well-being (r = 0.20 to 0.38). The most thoroughly researched constructs were work-life balance, workplace bullying, and well-being. Leaders’ characteristics, leadership style, employer maltreatment, and workplace bullying have harmed workers’ well-being. Furthermore, job stress, workload, staff shortage, loss of privacy, and prejudice detrimentally impacted well-being. Notably, qualitative studies on work stress and support experience are lacking. Overall, studies on work outcomes and well-being among working females are limited. This review identifies the current gaps in work outcomes and well-being. It provides recommendations for future research directions and informs organisations on the importance of work outcomes on the well-being of these working women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业女性的工作成果与幸福感:系统文献综述
工作结果(工作压力、工作与生活的平衡、工作场所欺凌和支持)对职业女性幸福感的影响已经争论了几十年。随着女性就业率的上升,迫切需要调查工作结果对幸福感的负面影响,以留住员工。因此,本综述确定了职业女性的工作成果与心理健康之间的关联。本综述利用七个数据库(EBSCOhost Research Database、Scopus、Sage Publications、PubMed、Taylor and Francis Online、Google Scholar 和 Wiley Online),共纳入了 13 项定量研究和 10 项定性研究。该综述报告了工作压力与幸福感之间的中等联系(r = -0.20 至 -0.44)、工作与生活平衡与幸福感之间的弱至强联系(r = 0.12 至 0.70)、工作场所欺凌与幸福感之间的中等联系(r = -0.21 至 -0.24)以及支持与幸福感之间的弱至中等联系(r = 0.20 至 0.38)。研究最深入的因素是工作与生活的平衡、职场欺凌和幸福感。领导者的特点、领导风格、雇主虐待和工作场所欺凌损害了工人的幸福感。此外,工作压力、工作量、人员短缺、隐私权的丧失和偏见也对幸福感产生了不利影响。值得注意的是,缺乏对工作压力和支持体验的定性研究。总体而言,有关职业女性工作成果和幸福感的研究十分有限。本综述指出了目前在工作成果和幸福感方面存在的差距。它为未来的研究方向提供了建议,并让各组织了解工作成果对这些职业女性福祉的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mainstreaming Flood Mitigation in Building Code: A Bibliometric Analysis Needs Analysis for The Development of Financial Literacy Model in Mathematics Education for B40 Malaysia Secondary School Students Internet Use and Social Participation of Young Adults: Evidence from Rights Safeguard Online in China Infectious Disease Epidemics in Kazakhstan in the 1900–1930s and Their Impact on Healthcare Development The Dialectics of Nigeria’s Opaque Downstream Oil Sector and the Agency of Fuel Subsidy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1