求助PDF
{"title":"GFsa (GF “Scientific Age”) Index Application for Assessment of 1020 Highly Cited Researchers in Dentistry: A Pilot Study Comparing GFsa Index and H-Index","authors":"G. Fernandes, Juliana Campos Hasse Fernandes","doi":"10.3390/publications12020018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The goal of this pilot study was to present a new index system (GFsa©) based on two variables, the total citations and “scientific age”, to evaluate the best-ranked researchers in dentistry. Methods: All researchers included were cited in the AD Scientific Index (2024, dentistry field) and had their Google Scholar page accessible for a manual consultation. Two authors retrieved this information. A dataset was prepared (name, H-index, i10 index, and publications). The formula applied was GFsa = (total number of citations)/(“scientific age”)2. The Pearson correlation statistically evaluated the data obtained; the confidence interval was 95%. Results: A total of 1020 were included. The mean “scientific age” was 34.18 ± 13.34. The GFsa© index was calculated, presenting a minimum value of 0.2186 and a maximum of 154.8. The data were organized and sorted following the ranking obtained. The Pearson correlation showed that the H-index had a weakly positive association with the researcher’s “scientific age”; thus, the H-index increased according to the increase in “scientific age”. By contrast, a moderately negative correlation between GFsa and “scientific age” was demonstrated. Moreover, a positive correlation was observed between both indexes. Conclusions: The variable reported (“Scientific age”) provided a better evaluation among the researchers in dentistry.","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":" 1026","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/publications12020018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
应用 GFsa(GF "科学时代")指数评估 1020 名牙科高被引研究人员:比较 GFsa 指数和 H 指数的试点研究
研究目的本试验性研究的目的是提出一种基于总引用次数和 "科学年龄 "这两个变量的新指标体系(GFsa©),以评估牙科领域排名最靠前的研究人员。研究方法纳入的所有研究人员均被 AD 科学索引(2024 年,牙科领域)引用,其谷歌学术页面可供人工查询。两位作者检索了这些信息。数据集(姓名、H 指数、i10 指数和出版物)已准备就绪。计算公式为:GFsa=(总引用次数)/("科学年龄")2。皮尔逊相关性对所获得的数据进行了统计评估;置信区间为 95%。结果共纳入 1020 篇论文。平均 "科学年龄 "为 34.18 ± 13.34。计算得出的 GFsa©指数最小值为 0.2186,最大值为 154.8。数据按照获得的排名进行了整理和分类。皮尔逊相关性表明,H 指数与研究人员的 "科研年龄 "呈弱正相关;因此,H 指数随着 "科研年龄 "的增加而增加。相比之下,GFsa 与 "科研年龄 "之间呈中度负相关。此外,还观察到这两个指数之间存在正相关。结论报告中的变量("科学年龄")为牙科研究人员提供了更好的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。