Actions of bronchodilator drugs, glucocorticoid, and their combinations on airways in rats and guinea pigs.

Acta pharmacologica et toxicologica Pub Date : 1985-01-01
R O Salonen
{"title":"Actions of bronchodilator drugs, glucocorticoid, and their combinations on airways in rats and guinea pigs.","authors":"R O Salonen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The principal aim of the present investigation was to examine in detail individual and combined actions on airways of four antiasthmatic drugs with different mechanisms of action. They were theophylline (THEO), the beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist terbutaline (TER), the antimuscarinic ipratropium bromide (IPRA), and the glucocorticoid betamethasone (BM). The respiratory measurements (intratracheal pressure in rats and lung resistance and dynamic lung compliance in guinea pigs) were performed in anaesthetized, mechanically ventilated animals. Mild, moderate, and submaximal obstruction of mainly large or small airways were induced by a cumulative administration of either methacholine (MeCh) or leukotriene D4 (LTD4), both i.v. The antiasthmatic drugs were given acutely i.v., but THEO and BM also as intraperitoneal pretreatments. Moreover, actions of the antiasthmatic drugs were studied ex vivo on lung beta-adrenoceptors in rats and guinea pigs. 3H-dihydroalprenolol was used as a ligand in the beta-receptor binding assay. A detailed evaluation of the lung resistance and dynamic lung compliance responses to MeCh and LTD4 suggested that MeCh induced obstruction in more proximal airways than LTD4. THEO attenuated both airway challenges, being about 2-4 times more efficient on LTD4 than on MeCh. TER inhibited both MeCh- and LTD4-induced airway obstruction about equally, whereas IPRA was effective on the MeCh-induced obstruction only. In most cases, treatment with THEO+TER or THEO+IPRA attenuated the MeCh-induced mild or moderate obstruction of large airways additively, and the submaximal airway response to MeCh synergistically. The relatively good effect of THEO on small airway obstruction caused by MeCh was not augmented by TER or IPRA. In contrast to these results, combination of subefficient doses of THEO and TER, but not of THEO and IPRA, resulted in an antagonistic interaction on the MeCh challenge in rats and guinea pigs. The combined action of THEO+TER was at its best additive on large and small airways obstruction caused by LTD4. Addition of IPRA to THEO treatment did not modify the effects on LTD4 challenge. Neither TER nor IPRA enhanced the cardiovascular effects of THEO in rats or guinea pigs. THEO administration to rats and guinea pigs resulted in plasma concentrations (7.5-32 micrograms/ml) that were roughly comparable to clinically relevant values. The respective lung tissue concentrations were 53-81% of the plasma values. In rats, but not in guinea pigs, combined treatment with THEO+TER increased the THEO concentration in lung tissue.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":6972,"journal":{"name":"Acta pharmacologica et toxicologica","volume":"57 Suppl 3 ","pages":"1-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta pharmacologica et toxicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The principal aim of the present investigation was to examine in detail individual and combined actions on airways of four antiasthmatic drugs with different mechanisms of action. They were theophylline (THEO), the beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist terbutaline (TER), the antimuscarinic ipratropium bromide (IPRA), and the glucocorticoid betamethasone (BM). The respiratory measurements (intratracheal pressure in rats and lung resistance and dynamic lung compliance in guinea pigs) were performed in anaesthetized, mechanically ventilated animals. Mild, moderate, and submaximal obstruction of mainly large or small airways were induced by a cumulative administration of either methacholine (MeCh) or leukotriene D4 (LTD4), both i.v. The antiasthmatic drugs were given acutely i.v., but THEO and BM also as intraperitoneal pretreatments. Moreover, actions of the antiasthmatic drugs were studied ex vivo on lung beta-adrenoceptors in rats and guinea pigs. 3H-dihydroalprenolol was used as a ligand in the beta-receptor binding assay. A detailed evaluation of the lung resistance and dynamic lung compliance responses to MeCh and LTD4 suggested that MeCh induced obstruction in more proximal airways than LTD4. THEO attenuated both airway challenges, being about 2-4 times more efficient on LTD4 than on MeCh. TER inhibited both MeCh- and LTD4-induced airway obstruction about equally, whereas IPRA was effective on the MeCh-induced obstruction only. In most cases, treatment with THEO+TER or THEO+IPRA attenuated the MeCh-induced mild or moderate obstruction of large airways additively, and the submaximal airway response to MeCh synergistically. The relatively good effect of THEO on small airway obstruction caused by MeCh was not augmented by TER or IPRA. In contrast to these results, combination of subefficient doses of THEO and TER, but not of THEO and IPRA, resulted in an antagonistic interaction on the MeCh challenge in rats and guinea pigs. The combined action of THEO+TER was at its best additive on large and small airways obstruction caused by LTD4. Addition of IPRA to THEO treatment did not modify the effects on LTD4 challenge. Neither TER nor IPRA enhanced the cardiovascular effects of THEO in rats or guinea pigs. THEO administration to rats and guinea pigs resulted in plasma concentrations (7.5-32 micrograms/ml) that were roughly comparable to clinically relevant values. The respective lung tissue concentrations were 53-81% of the plasma values. In rats, but not in guinea pigs, combined treatment with THEO+TER increased the THEO concentration in lung tissue.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支气管扩张剂、糖皮质激素及其联合用药对大鼠和豚鼠气道的作用。
本研究的主要目的是详细检查四种不同作用机制的平喘药对气道的单独和联合作用。它们是茶碱(THEO)、β 2-肾上腺素能受体激动剂特布他林(TER)、抗uscarinic异丙托溴铵(IPRA)和糖皮质激素倍他米松(BM)。在麻醉、机械通气的动物中进行呼吸测量(大鼠的气管内压和豚鼠的肺阻力和动态肺顺应性)。累积给药甲胆碱(MeCh)或白三烯D4 (LTD4)均可引起以大、小气道为主的轻度、中度和次重度梗阻。平喘药物均急性静脉给药,但THEO和BM也可作为腹腔前处理。此外,我们还在体外研究了平喘药对大鼠和豚鼠肺β -肾上腺素受体的作用。在β受体结合实验中,3h -二氢阿普萘洛尔被用作配体。对MeCh和LTD4的肺阻力和动态肺顺应性反应的详细评估表明,MeCh比LTD4更能引起近端气道阻塞。THEO减轻了两种气道挑战,LTD4的效率是MeCh的2-4倍。TER对MeCh-和ltd4诱导的气道阻塞的抑制作用基本相同,而IPRA仅对MeCh诱导的气道阻塞有效。在大多数情况下,THEO+TER或THEO+IPRA治疗可叠加减弱MeCh诱导的轻度或中度大气道阻塞,并协同减弱对MeCh的次极大气道反应。THEO对MeCh引起的小气道阻塞的较好疗效,与TER或IPRA没有增强。与这些结果相反,在大鼠和豚鼠中,低剂量的THEO和TER(而不是THEO和IPRA)联合使用可导致对MeCh攻击的拮抗相互作用。THEO+TER对LTD4所致大、小气道阻塞的联合作用最佳。在THEO治疗中加入IPRA并没有改变对LTD4挑战的影响。在大鼠或豚鼠中,TER和IPRA均未增强THEO的心血管作用。给大鼠和豚鼠注射THEO后,其血浆浓度(7.5-32微克/毫升)与临床相关值大致相当。肺组织浓度分别为血浆浓度的53-81%。在大鼠中,THEO+TER联合治疗增加了肺组织中THEO的浓度,但在豚鼠中没有。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Increased specificity of the 3 H-acetic anhydride coupling method for plasma analysis of drugs containing secondary amino groups. The tubular site of urate transport in the rabbit kidney, and the effect of probenecid on urate secretion. Methaemoglobin formation by diamino metabolities of DNOC and DNBP. Respiratory and cardiovascular effects of 3-methylxanthine, a metabolite of theophylline. The pharmacology of a new hypoglycaemic agent N-[4-(2-(2,3-dihydrobenzo (b) furan-7-carboxamido)-ethyl)-benzenesulphonyl]-N'-cyclohexylurea (NOVO CS 476). II. Pharmacological studies on the mechanism of action.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1