The Valuation of Loss Firms: A Stock Market Perspective

Abacus Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1111/abac.12324
Hannes Mohrschladt, Susanne Siedhoff
{"title":"The Valuation of Loss Firms: A Stock Market Perspective","authors":"Hannes Mohrschladt, Susanne Siedhoff","doi":"10.1111/abac.12324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proportion of exchange‐listed firms with negative earnings has increased to over 40% in recent years. Previous research shows that the valuation of these loss firms is comparably difficult due to their uncertain future earnings path. Given these valuation issues, we argue that the stocks of loss firms should be particularly prone to mispricing such that simple firm value proxies might allow the prediction of subsequent stock returns. Supporting this hypothesis empirically, we find that book‐to‐market and revenue‐to‐price positively predict the cross‐section of loss firms’ stock returns. In particular, these value effects are significantly stronger compared to gain firms. Our further analyses support a behavioural mechanism for the empirical observations as the return predictability is disproportionately strong around earnings announcements and as analysts are too optimistic for loss firms with low values of book‐to‐market and revenue‐to‐price. Our analyses on short selling and option trading indicate that sophisticated investors are aware of the documented return predictability, but limits to arbitrage prevent an immediate correction of mispricing.","PeriodicalId":501337,"journal":{"name":"Abacus","volume":" 100","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abacus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proportion of exchange‐listed firms with negative earnings has increased to over 40% in recent years. Previous research shows that the valuation of these loss firms is comparably difficult due to their uncertain future earnings path. Given these valuation issues, we argue that the stocks of loss firms should be particularly prone to mispricing such that simple firm value proxies might allow the prediction of subsequent stock returns. Supporting this hypothesis empirically, we find that book‐to‐market and revenue‐to‐price positively predict the cross‐section of loss firms’ stock returns. In particular, these value effects are significantly stronger compared to gain firms. Our further analyses support a behavioural mechanism for the empirical observations as the return predictability is disproportionately strong around earnings announcements and as analysts are too optimistic for loss firms with low values of book‐to‐market and revenue‐to‐price. Our analyses on short selling and option trading indicate that sophisticated investors are aware of the documented return predictability, but limits to arbitrage prevent an immediate correction of mispricing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亏损企业的估值:股市视角
近年来,在交易所上市的公司中,负收益公司的比例已增至 40% 以上。以往的研究表明,由于这些亏损企业的未来盈利路径不确定,对其进行估值相当困难。鉴于这些估值问题,我们认为,亏损企业的股票应该特别容易被错误定价,因此简单的公司价值代用指标可能有助于预测后续股票回报。为了从经验上支持这一假设,我们发现账面市值比和收入价格比可以正向预测亏损企业股票收益的横截面。特别是,与收益公司相比,这些价值效应明显更强。我们的进一步分析支持实证观察的行为机制,因为收益预测性在盈利公布前后特别强,而且分析师对账面价值和收入价格比较低的亏损企业过于乐观。我们对卖空和期权交易的分析表明,老练的投资者意识到了记录在案的回报可预测性,但套利的限制阻碍了对错误定价的立即纠正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to Analyze the Practical Relevance of Costing Methods? The Example of Hospital Cost Accounting in France Tone Management and Litigation Concerns in CEOs’ Early Years Does the Publication or the Implementation of IAS 19(R) Have Real Economic Consequences? Financial Resilience Perspective on COVID‐19 Business Support: A Comparative Study of Four European Countries Managerial Ability and Debt Choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1