The flaring activity of blazar AO 0235+164 in 2021

J. Escudero Pedrosa, I. Agudo, Till Moritz, P. Alan Marscher, S. Jorstad, A. Tramacere, C. Casadio, C. Thum, I. Myserlis, A. Sievers, J. Otero-Santos, D. Morcuende, R. López-Coto, F. D’Ammando, G. Bonnoli, M. Gurwell, José Luis Gómez, R. Rao, G. Keating
{"title":"The flaring activity of blazar AO 0235+164 in 2021","authors":"J. Escudero Pedrosa, I. Agudo, Till Moritz, P. Alan Marscher, S. Jorstad, A. Tramacere, C. Casadio, C. Thum, I. Myserlis, A. Sievers, J. Otero-Santos, D. Morcuende, R. López-Coto, F. D’Ammando, G. Bonnoli, M. Gurwell, José Luis Gómez, R. Rao, G. Keating","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202449726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The blazar AO 0235+164 located at redshift $z=0.94$, has displayed interesting and repeating flaring activity in the past, with recent episodes in 2008 and 2015. In 2020, the source brightened again, starting a new flaring episode that peaked in 2021. We study the origin and properties of the 2021 flare in relation to previous studies and the historical behavior of the source, in particular the 2008 and 2015 flaring episodes. We analyzed the multiwavelength photo-polarimetric evolution of the source. From Very Long Baseline Array images, we derived the kinematic parameters of new components associated with the 2021 flare. We used this information to constrain a model for the spectral energy distribution of the emission during the flaring period. We propose an analytical geometric model to test whether the observed wobbling of the jet is consistent with precession. We report the appearance of two new components that are ejected in a different direction than previously, confirming the wobbling of the jet. We find that the direction of ejection is consistent with that of a precessing jet.\n Our derived period independently agrees with the values commonly found in the literature.\n \n Modeling of the spectral energy distribution further confirms that the differences between flares can be attributed to geometrical effects.","PeriodicalId":505693,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":" 82","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The blazar AO 0235+164 located at redshift $z=0.94$, has displayed interesting and repeating flaring activity in the past, with recent episodes in 2008 and 2015. In 2020, the source brightened again, starting a new flaring episode that peaked in 2021. We study the origin and properties of the 2021 flare in relation to previous studies and the historical behavior of the source, in particular the 2008 and 2015 flaring episodes. We analyzed the multiwavelength photo-polarimetric evolution of the source. From Very Long Baseline Array images, we derived the kinematic parameters of new components associated with the 2021 flare. We used this information to constrain a model for the spectral energy distribution of the emission during the flaring period. We propose an analytical geometric model to test whether the observed wobbling of the jet is consistent with precession. We report the appearance of two new components that are ejected in a different direction than previously, confirming the wobbling of the jet. We find that the direction of ejection is consistent with that of a precessing jet. Our derived period independently agrees with the values commonly found in the literature. Modeling of the spectral energy distribution further confirms that the differences between flares can be attributed to geometrical effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2021 年炽星 AO 0235+164 的耀斑活动
位于红移$z=0.94$的耀斑星AO 0235+164在过去显示出有趣的、重复的耀斑活动,最近的耀斑活动发生在2008年和2015年。2020 年,该光源再次变亮,开始了新一轮的耀斑活动,并在 2021 年达到顶峰。我们研究了 2021 年耀斑的起源和特性,并将其与以前的研究和该源的历史行为,尤其是 2008 年和 2015 年的耀斑事件联系起来。我们分析了源的多波长光偏振演变。通过甚长基线阵列图像,我们得出了与2021年耀斑相关的新成分的运动参数。我们利用这些信息来约束耀斑期间发射的光谱能量分布模型。我们提出了一个几何分析模型来检验观测到的喷流摆动是否与前摄一致。我们报告了两个新成分的出现,它们的喷射方向与以前不同,证实了喷流的摆动。我们发现喷流的喷射方向与前冲喷流的喷射方向一致。我们独立得出的周期与文献中常见的值一致。 光谱能量分布模型进一步证实,耀斑之间的差异可以归因于几何效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A new census of dust and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at z=0.7-2 with JWST MIRI Discovery of HCCCH_2CCH in TMC-1 with the QUIJOTE line survey Extragalactic globular cluster near-infrared spectroscopy. I. Integrated near-infrared spectra of Centaurus A/NGC 5128 Revealing the inner workings of the lensed quasar SDSS J1339+1310 : Insights from microlensing analysis The impact of improved estimates of radio star astrometric models on the alignment of the Gaia bright reference frame to ICRF3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1