Safety and efficacy of ambulatory tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of 10–25-mm renal calculi

Parsa Nikoufar, Amr Hodhod, Ruba Abdul Hadi, Loay Abbas, Sai K. Vangala, A. Zakaria, M. Gawish, Amer Alaref, R. Rozenberg, H. Elmansy
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of ambulatory tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of 10–25-mm renal calculi","authors":"Parsa Nikoufar, Amr Hodhod, Ruba Abdul Hadi, Loay Abbas, Sai K. Vangala, A. Zakaria, M. Gawish, Amer Alaref, R. Rozenberg, H. Elmansy","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ambulatory mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in a totally tubeless exit (without a nephrostomy tube or an internal stent) and tubeless exit (without a nephrostomy tube but with an internal stent) for the treatment of renal calculi 10–25 mm in size.\nMethods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent mini-PCNL at our institution between September 2018 and September 2022. The study included a cohort of 95 patients diagnosed with renal calculi measuring 10–25 mm. All patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) renal colic scan preoperatively, on postoperative day one (POD 1), and at three-month followup. Patient demographics and outcome parameters were recorded, including stone characteristics, operative time, hospital stay, stone-free rate (SFR), complication rates, and subsequent emergency room (ER) visits. Patients were considered stone-free if they had no fragments or residual fragments measuring <4 mm.\nResults: The median maximum stone diameter was 16 mm (10–25 mm). Twenty-nine patients (30.5%) had multiple renal calculi. The median operative time was 64 (38–135) minutes. Eighty-six patients (90.5%) underwent a totally tubeless procedure, without a nephrostomy tube or an internal stent. All patients were discharged home on the same operative day with a median hospitalization time of six hours. Seven (7.4%) postoperative ER visits were recorded, and two (2.1%) led to hospital readmission. The frequency of grade I, II, and III Clavien-Dindo complications were 18 (18.9%), one (1.1%), and one (1.1%), respectively. The SFR on POD 1 and three-month followup was 73.7% and 92.6%, respectively. None of the patients in the study required retreatment.\nConclusions: Ambulatory tubeless mini-PCNL is a safe and effective treatment option for 10–25 mm renal stones. Experienced institutions can safely adopt ambulatory mini-PCNL as a treatment option without an increased risk of postoperative complications, ER visits, or hospital readmissions.","PeriodicalId":38001,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ambulatory mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in a totally tubeless exit (without a nephrostomy tube or an internal stent) and tubeless exit (without a nephrostomy tube but with an internal stent) for the treatment of renal calculi 10–25 mm in size. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent mini-PCNL at our institution between September 2018 and September 2022. The study included a cohort of 95 patients diagnosed with renal calculi measuring 10–25 mm. All patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) renal colic scan preoperatively, on postoperative day one (POD 1), and at three-month followup. Patient demographics and outcome parameters were recorded, including stone characteristics, operative time, hospital stay, stone-free rate (SFR), complication rates, and subsequent emergency room (ER) visits. Patients were considered stone-free if they had no fragments or residual fragments measuring <4 mm. Results: The median maximum stone diameter was 16 mm (10–25 mm). Twenty-nine patients (30.5%) had multiple renal calculi. The median operative time was 64 (38–135) minutes. Eighty-six patients (90.5%) underwent a totally tubeless procedure, without a nephrostomy tube or an internal stent. All patients were discharged home on the same operative day with a median hospitalization time of six hours. Seven (7.4%) postoperative ER visits were recorded, and two (2.1%) led to hospital readmission. The frequency of grade I, II, and III Clavien-Dindo complications were 18 (18.9%), one (1.1%), and one (1.1%), respectively. The SFR on POD 1 and three-month followup was 73.7% and 92.6%, respectively. None of the patients in the study required retreatment. Conclusions: Ambulatory tubeless mini-PCNL is a safe and effective treatment option for 10–25 mm renal stones. Experienced institutions can safely adopt ambulatory mini-PCNL as a treatment option without an increased risk of postoperative complications, ER visits, or hospital readmissions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊无管微型经皮肾镜碎石术治疗 10-25 毫米肾结石的安全性和有效性
简介:本研究旨在评估门诊微型经皮肾镜取石术(mini-PCNL)在完全无管出口(无肾造瘘管或内支架)和无管出口(无肾造瘘管但有内支架)治疗大小为10-25毫米的肾结石的安全性和有效性:我们对2018年9月至2022年9月期间在我院接受迷你PCNL的患者进行了回顾性分析。研究纳入了 95 例被诊断为肾结石(10-25 毫米)的患者。所有患者在术前、术后第一天(POD 1)和三个月随访时均接受了计算机断层扫描(CT)肾绞痛扫描。记录了患者的人口统计学特征和结果参数,包括结石特征、手术时间、住院时间、无结石率(SFR)、并发症发生率以及随后的急诊就诊率。如果患者体内无碎石或残余碎石小于4毫米,则被视为无结石:中位最大结石直径为 16 毫米(10-25 毫米)。29名患者(30.5%)患有多发性肾结石。手术时间中位数为 64 (38-135) 分钟。86名患者(90.5%)接受了完全无管手术,没有肾造瘘管或内支架。所有患者均在手术当天出院回家,中位住院时间为 6 小时。术后急诊就诊记录为7例(7.4%),2例(2.1%)导致再次入院。I、II和III级Clavien-Dindo并发症的发生率分别为18(18.9%)、1(1.1%)和1(1.1%)。POD 1 和三个月随访的 SFR 分别为 73.7% 和 92.6%。研究中没有一名患者需要再次治疗:结论:对于 10-25 毫米的肾结石,非卧床无管微型 PCNL 是一种安全有效的治疗方案。有经验的医疗机构可以安全地将非卧床迷你 PCNL 作为一种治疗方案,而不会增加术后并发症、急诊室就诊或再次入院的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Published by the Canadian Urological Association, the Canadian Urological Association Journal (CUAJ) released its first issue in March 2007, and was published four times that year under the guidance of founding editor (Editor Emeritus as of 2012), Dr. Laurence H. Klotz. In 2008, CUAJ became a bimonthly publication. As of 2013, articles have been published monthly, alternating between print and online-only versions (print issues are available in February, April, June, August, October, and December; online-only issues are produced in January, March, May, July, September, and November). In 2017, the journal launched an ahead-of-print publishing strategy, in which accepted manuscripts are published electronically on our website and cited on PubMed ahead of their official issue-based publication date. By significantly shortening the time to article availability, we offer our readers more flexibility in the way they engage with our content: as a continuous stream, or in a monthly “package,” or both. CUAJ covers a broad range of urological topics — oncology, pediatrics, transplantation, endourology, female urology, infertility, and more. We take pride in showcasing the work of some of Canada’s top investigators and providing our readers with the latest relevant evidence-based research, and on being the primary repository for major guidelines and other important practice recommendations. Our long-term vision is to become an essential destination for urology-based research, education, and advocacy for both physicians and patients, and to act as a springboard for discussions within the urologic community.
期刊最新文献
Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-assisted bedside ureteric stent placement 2024 Canadian Urological Association endorsement of an expert report: Kidney involvement in tuberous sclerosis complex Sacral neuromodulation in pediatric refractory bladder and bowel dysfunction Fostering the continued growth of our association On vacation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1