Relative efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells for osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Xiaoyuan Tian, Zhenan Qu, Ying Cao, Bocheng Zhang
{"title":"Relative efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells for osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Xiaoyuan Tian, Zhenan Qu, Ying Cao, Bocheng Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fendo.2024.1366297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to May 6, 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared MSCs and placebo or other nonsurgical approaches for treating OA. Two investigators independently searched the literature and extracted data, and conventional meta-analyses were conducted with Review Manager 5.3. The outcomes included pain relief, functional improvement, and risk of adverse events (AEs).A total of 18 articles were included. Overall, MSCs were superior to placebo in terms of relieving pain and improving function at the 12-month follow-up. However, the differences in treatment-related AEs were not significant.MSCs may relieving pain and improving function of OA. The limitations of this study include the high heterogeneity of the included studies. Additionally, the follow-up time in the included studies was relatively short, so more clinical trials are needed to predict the long-term efficacy and safety of MSCs.https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5BT6E, identifier CRD42022354824.","PeriodicalId":505784,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","volume":" 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1366297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to May 6, 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared MSCs and placebo or other nonsurgical approaches for treating OA. Two investigators independently searched the literature and extracted data, and conventional meta-analyses were conducted with Review Manager 5.3. The outcomes included pain relief, functional improvement, and risk of adverse events (AEs).A total of 18 articles were included. Overall, MSCs were superior to placebo in terms of relieving pain and improving function at the 12-month follow-up. However, the differences in treatment-related AEs were not significant.MSCs may relieving pain and improving function of OA. The limitations of this study include the high heterogeneity of the included studies. Additionally, the follow-up time in the included studies was relatively short, so more clinical trials are needed to predict the long-term efficacy and safety of MSCs.https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5BT6E, identifier CRD42022354824.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
间充质干细胞治疗骨关节炎的相对疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
这项荟萃分析旨在评估间充质干细胞(MSCs)治疗膝骨关节炎(OA)的有效性和安全性。研究人员检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Scopus和Web of Science等数据库,时间跨度从开始到2024年5月6日,以确定比较间充质干细胞和安慰剂或其他非手术疗法治疗OA的随机对照试验。两名研究人员独立检索文献并提取数据,使用Review Manager 5.3进行常规荟萃分析。结果包括疼痛缓解、功能改善和不良事件(AEs)风险。总体而言,在12个月的随访中,间充质干细胞在缓解疼痛和改善功能方面优于安慰剂。然而,治疗相关的AEs差异并不显著。本研究的局限性包括所纳入研究的高度异质性。此外,纳入研究的随访时间相对较短,因此需要更多的临床试验来预测间充质干细胞的长期疗效和安全性。https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5BT6E,标识符为CRD42022354824。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
T1 mapping combined with arterial spin labeling MRI to identify renal injury in patients with liver cirrhosis Adjunctive benefits of low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for obesity frequent chronic conditions: a systematic review Cadmium activation of wild-type and constitutively active estrogen receptor alpha Editorial: Preventing cardiovascular complications of type 2 diabetes The causal relationship between antihypertensive drugs and depression: a Mendelian randomization study of drug targets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1